What's new

'Muslims From Pakistan, Bangladesh Should Be Thrown Out Of Country', Says Shiv Sena In Saamana

. .
Those Gentlemen who tied East Bengal with Muslim majority regions of North British India and formed Union of East & West Pakistan after 1940 resolution were million times more brilliant and strategy masters than likes of Bhutto,Mujib and their lot combined.By forming two Muslim blocks they checkmated new rulers of Delhi before they even claimed a seat in Red Fort, then ethno/ lingo fascism was spread in East Pakistan and rest is history.

Not really.

Bhutto/Mujeeb were pos opportunist traitors without a doubt. But the idea of East Bengal merged with West Pakistan was horrible to say the least. Bengal would have become independent one way or another. And it has nothing to do with racism etc.

East Pakistan was a backward/poor backwater shi1hole land with very few resources and industries. It was sapping all our economic resources even though Ayub did start industrial/infrastructure work over there. But it still was not enough. Language issue was also the problem when Punjabis, Sindhis Pashtuns etc accepted Urdu here as Pakistan's national language; Bengalis did not. Resentment against West Pakistan was increasing.

Btw, no leader/statesman/politician in Pakistan's entire history could even come close to Allama Iqbal (RA). He was the first person who demanded a separate homeland for the Muslims residing in the North-West of British India in his famous Allahabad speech of 1930. And in that speech he mentioned Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and NWFP amalgamated into a single state but he did not so much as uttered a word about Bengal; even though Bengal had more Muslim population than all of these provinces' Muslim population combined together at that time.

The only solution that was feasible was that of Chaudhry Rehmat Ali who wanted Pakistan as a separate country but in alliance with the Muslim majority country in North East of British India which he named as Bangistan.
This was the only solution that was workable.

Today, in a hindsight, one can easily ascertain who was right and who was wrong.

@Mangus Ortus Novem
 
Last edited:
. . .
It was Indians not Hindus. General Manekshaw was a Zoroastrian or Parsi as we call them. And yes, 71' was indeed a big tactical and strategic loss for Pakistan.
India traces it's origin to a river flowing somewhere in Pakistan.
Sam was just doing what his employer wanted him to do.
 
. . .
India traces it's origin to a river flowing somewhere in Pakistan.
Sam was just doing what his employer wanted him to do.
It doesn't matter what India traces its origin to. India is modern day India. That's it.
Typical of a Pakistani to associate everything with religion lol. I was just correcting your usage of the word Hindu instead of Indian. IA is comprised of Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims, Christians, Zoroastrians, Buddhists, Jains and many other faiths. I know your brain would have a hard time processing so much diversity especially when it revolves around religion.
 
.
India can throw out those secular muslims. Those are traitors anyway. Neither Pakistan nor Bangladesh will accommodate traitors. Basically those seculars will become stateless.
 
. . . . . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom