war&peace
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2015
- Messages
- 33,771
- Reaction score
- 18
- Country
- Location
All your words are true bro.Well libya case is not that simple ... kindly note that had it not been money from libya we would not have made the bomb ... things are more complicated here and lets not open another pandorabox ...
Even for a moment if we assumes that your allegations are correct and AQK is not even a scientist ... Do you know our PAEC (I mean no disrespect to our heros of PAEC) failed to made the nuclear through Plutonium route and it was Dr. AQK who succeed in getting the enriched Uranium (which is the most difficult in highly enriched type of nuclear bomb) ... So basically when PAEC failed in start AQK succeded ...
On another thread I was listening to another poster who was bitching about Dr. Samar Mubarakmand claim of coal gasification in Thar ...
Just one question to you ,,, what is your qualification to comment on issues like that? Are you nuclear scientists working at a senior position in AKQ lab or PAEC?o STFU and start respecting your heroes ...
Some fools are pretending to be experts here but they are nothing more than ungrateful disrespectful kids who have no knowledge of science and lack common sense.
Today Pakistan, MashaAllah, has both Pu (Plutonium) and U (Uranium) based nuclear programs. In reality though Pu based program is also based on U-238 which is far more available isotope of uranium than U-235 which is used in the U-based program. However U-238 is relatively stable so it needs to be converted to Pu through nuclear transmutation (I'm skipping intermediate steps) and then Pu is used in the nuclear reaction called fission that produces the energy and neutrons. While in U-235 reaction the U is directly used so Pu based has obvious advantages but it has some disadvantages and that is requires "reprocessing" of the nuclear waste and thus a long chain of facilities required to produce the energy and Pu for weapons while U235 can be separated from U238 using the phenomena of centrifuging and density difference. Getting higher ratio of U-235 (fissile material) as part of the fuel is called enrichment process and enrichment above 90% is required for a nuclear device and that is where Dr. A. Q. Khan comes into the picture with his skills centrifuging and the design of centrifuges that made it possible for Pakistan to leap frog and make a nuclear device for test in a relatively very short time and much less budget and procurements and thus by 1983 Pakistan had a testable device and by 1986 Pakistan had devices ready and acc. to some reports Pakistan tested its device in a friendly country.
I wish to agree with your words sir but P. Musharraf has lied so many times that it becomes impossible to convince myself to believe what he says. That is why a man's credibility is of paramount importance. He may be saying the truth but it is really difficult for me to reconcile different parts of his statements. The only part of this story I still believe is the ouster of NS, not because Musharraf is truthful rather NS is the biggest liar in our entire history.the timing of this statement is imaculate
very well planned and well played Khawaja Asif.
while his boss is discredited and kicked out of the office and he is ranting against army and Judiciary in Lahore... and Donald Tump is ragin Against the imbecile of North Korea... Nawaz party decides that its a good time to put pressure on Pakistani state and its military and bring it to its knees and as the America is looking for alternative power (like Northern alliance thuglords against Taliban inside Afghanistan) present Nawaz league as a compliant party that will not only sterilize Pakistani nuclear technology but counter the Pakistan army as well if it gets "sufficient" support from Americans.
Musharraf says that there was no chance to deny it when he was presented with our models and our centrifuges which the Libyans and Iranians had admitted to the inspectors.
he had to admit the proliferation. Americans wanted the head of Dr Qadir but he denied that and even access to him. that was the least he could do. had it been a democratic government then who knows he would have been flown away in a CIA plane.
whether or not Pak military/ establishment was complicit in the proliferation is irrelevant and its a waste of time to blame Qadeer alone either because both Libyans and Iranians admitted that he got our help.
but one thing that did happen after this event is that Dr Qadeer laboratories came under the supervision of PAEC and their independent status was abolished conflict of interest and segregation of duties is very paramount in running sensitive organisations that are of strategic interest to the state. the head of KRL did have autonomous procurement and logistics operations with little to no audit about expenditures but like I said it changed as the nuclear command authority was instituted and more stringent controls were implemented after this episode.
something which successive American administrations have acknowledged.
Last edited: