Musharraf's 'glorious' words about the Constitution of Pakistan

[Maarkhoor]

Hello PDF Awaam,

I have had enough of the Musharraf's treason case and honestly I am tired of arguing for the constitution of this country which is the basis of everything that is standing today.

Every soldier takes an oath to uphold the constitution of this country, his very official existence is based on the constitution.

Constitution is supreme and if there's no constitution, how would we govern ourselves anyway?

There are two things to see here..

DGISPR came out with a strong worder statement which said that the Army hopes that the justice will be provided based on the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Justice for whom?

The person who says, "I think the Constitution is just a piece of paper to be thrown into the dustbin."


If any Pakistani, especially a soldier defends these words, he/she is denying the existence of every State institution, especially the Armed Forces.

I fear a day when another General would say the same words and throw out a democratically elected Government.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1207258609643593728

 

[Myth_buster_1]

Let's be honest its a piece of trash taken from Brits and them modelled to help the privileged ones. No one on the roads gives a **** about the constitution because it wasn't made for them so their consent was neither taken nor needed.

dude!!!! you described it sooooo well and you made it seem like an art!!!!

 

[War Thunder]

The piece of trash was developed by the representatives of the people of Pakistan and every political party has consensus on it.

Where do you people come from?

 

[-blitzkrieg-]

"SC has held holding constitution in abeyance is subverting the constitution"

You are a rookie who doesnt know what he is talking about most of the time.
judges have supported abeyance of the constituion in past..one such instance was this..


The Constitution of 1973 was held in 'abeyance' and was endorsed in Begum Nusrat Bhutto Case (PLD- 77 SC 657) by the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Justice Anwarul Haq was the Chief Justice, and the rest of the brother judges who unanimously endorsed the 'paralysis of the Constitution' included; Justice Waheedud Din, Justice Mohammad Haleem, Justice Safdar Shah, Justice Mohammad Afzal Cheema, Justice Dorab Patel, Justice Mohammad Akram, Justice Nasim Hassan Shah and Justice Qaiser Khan.

Doctrine of neccessity prevails over a petty petty piece of paper.
saving state is more important than saving constitution.

 

[maverick1977]

Hello PDF Awaam,

I have had enough of the Musharraf's treason case and honestly I am tired of arguing for the constitution of this country which is the basis of everything that is standing today.

Every soldier takes an oath to uphold the constitution of this country, his very official existence is based on the constitution.

Constitution is supreme and if there's no constitution, how would we govern ourselves anyway?

There are two things to see here..

DGISPR came out with a strong worder statement which said that the Army hopes that the justice will be provided based on the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Justice for whom?

The person who says, "I think the Constitution is just a piece of paper to be thrown into the dustbin."


If any Pakistani, especially a soldier defends these words, he/she is denying the existence of every State institution, especially the Armed Forces.

I fear a day when another General would say the same words and throw out a democratically elected Government.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1207258609643593728

Thats sad to hear but Phansi is not justified.

 

[khail007]

It's the duty of your elected representatives to provide you that. It's like saying, why doesn't Qur'an provide me with good deeds, when in reality it's just a guidance, you have to earn the good deeds yourself. RIP Logic!

Don't show your knee-jerk reaction to putting reaction to RIP.
First don't compare the Quran with the man made document - this is not going to help you.
If you believe on Quran, that is a supreme law and only to be implemented by 'khalifah'; in Pakistan ou don't practise that system we are following western democracy under the law of slaves (left behind by occupational forces).
So what dignity this so called constitution has left when people sell there votes for one plate of Biryani or a Qeemay wala naan to elect those corrupts and thieves which were/are looting Pakistan.
Your believe here is that those who are 'haram-khors' and corrupts from head to toe will advice others for honesty and they will be honest.

 

[Xestan]

You are a rookie who doesnt know what he is talking about most of the time.
judges have supported abeyance of the constituion in past..one such instance was this..


The Constitution of 1973 was held in 'abeyance' and was endorsed in Begum Nusrat Bhutto Case (PLD- 77 SC 657) by the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Justice Anwarul Haq was the Chief Justice, and the rest of the brother judges who unanimously endorsed the 'paralysis of the Constitution' included; Justice Waheedud Din, Justice Mohammad Haleem, Justice Safdar Shah, Justice Mohammad Afzal Cheema, Justice Dorab Patel, Justice Mohammad Akram, Justice Nasim Hassan Shah and Justice Qaiser Khan.

Doctrine of neccessity prevails over a petty petty piece of paper.
saving state is more important than saving constitution.

We are talking right now. The Supreme Court of today decides the matters for me today, not some PCO judge of old.

Soldiers who break their oaths not only bring disgrace to their service but also go against the direct orders of Quaid-e-Azam.

 

[SABRE]

Let's be honest its a piece of trash taken from Brits and them modelled to help the privileged ones. No one on the roads gives a **** about the constitution because it wasn't made for them so their consent was neither taken nor needed.

A piece of paper that states Allah is the sovereign, a piece of paper that legally establishes "Khatm-e-Nabuwat" in the land of Pakistan, a piece of paper that establishes that the state is of people and not of institutions, a piece of paper that establishes fundamental human rights, a piece of paper that binds the segregated provinces into a union of a state, a piece of paper that resolves disputes, a piece of paper that is of our own making.

The Constitution of Pakistan is perhaps the greatest achievement of Pakistani legislature and state, and an example that a divided nation can unite for the sake of law to establish peace, cohesion, rights, and union. It is very much an achievement of people of Pakistan who had elected political leaders who in turn had expressed their desire and willingness to draft a constitution on behalf of the people.

Failure to understand the constitution and its necessity, and accordingly libeling it, is just about as iniquitous as its exploitation by the privileged ones. These are cause and effect. If people understood the constitution and its importance then perhaps it would not be so exploited by the elites.

 

[Xestan]

Don't show your knee-jerk reaction to putting reaction to RIP.
First don't compare the Quran with the man made document - this is not going to help you.
If you believe on Quran, that is a supreme law and only to be implemented by 'khalifah'; in Pakistan ou don't practise that system we are following western democracy under the law of slaves (left behind by occupational forces).
So what dignity this so called constitution has left when people sell there votes for one plate of Biryani or a Qeemay wala naan to elect those corrupts and thieves which were/are looting Pakistan.
Your believe here is that those who are 'haram-khors' and corrupts from head to toe will advice others for honesty and they will be honest.

It's the right of the people whoever they elect, one man or 18 men cannot decide things for the whole nation. That's treason and it should be punished.

 

[Haris Ali2140]

It's the right of the people whoever they elect, one man or 18 men cannot decide things for the whole nation. That's treason and it should be punished.

You wanna know how people's representatives are elect come to here south Punjab.

 

[khail007]

It's the right of the people whoever they elect, one man or 18 men cannot decide things for the whole nation. That's treason and it should be punished.

So who is going to punish, which are making money by their 'readers' outside to manipulate justice inside?

 

[Mentee]

Don't show your knee-jerk reaction to putting reaction to RIP.
First don't compare the Quran with the man made document - this is not going to help you.
If you believe on Quran, that is a supreme law and only to be implemented by 'khalifah'; in Pakistan ou don't practise that system we are following western democracy under the law of slaves (left behind by occupational forces).
So what dignity this so called constitution has left when people sell there votes for one plate of Biryani or a Qeemay wala naan to elect those corrupts and thieves which were/are looting Pakistan.
Your believe here is that those who are 'haram-khors' and corrupts from head to toe will advice others for honesty and they will be honest.

You can bring all sort of excuses to save the executive from being held accountable but your twisted interpretation of Islam never gonna get implemented in this country where people have made questioning the elite a norm and if you wish for a bloody revolution coz someone's hurt your feelings then be brave and count your loved ones in the causality list too. Aren't you happy that we just got one step closer to be a true Islamic republic by hitting at the nucleus of power?

The Naseem hijazi stories you read in the child hood are nothing short of imperial propaganda to raise loyal kuggos among the populace. Coz in caliphate your Khalifa too will get grilled by the accountability process and public will ask questions not only baiut his official functions but also his personal life too will be bright to lime light . And if he crossed the red line shall be thrown out of the power.

 

[khail007]

You can bring all sort of excuses to save the executive from being held accountable but your twisted interpretation of Islam never gonna get implemented in this country where people have made questioning the elite a norm and if you wish for a bloody revolution coz someone's hurt your feelings then be brave and count your loved ones in the causality list too. Aren't you happy that we just got one step closer to be a true Islamic republic by hitting at the nucleus of power?

The Naseem hijazi stories you read in the child hood are nothing short of imperial propaganda to raise loyal kuggos among the populace. Coz in caliphate your Khalifa too will get grilled by the accountability process and public will ask questions not only baiut his official functions but also his personal life too will be bright to like light . And if he crossed the red line shall be thrown out of the power.

Exactly ... every one should be brought to justice, every single person who commits crime should face it; but not from 'PATWAR' prism.
Same to you, your all twists and summersaults to prove corrupts and 'haram-khors' as 'Khalifah' will never bear any fruit but only a pain. At least myself, I never ever believe in the man made document which will never ever be perfect. Did you ever dare to question previous 'Khalifah' who on the floor of the 'مقدس پارلیمنٹ' tease Pakistanis with 'حضور والا یہ ھیں وہ ذرائع'
When Bhutto was hanged, most of the Pakistanis were celebrating with sweets. One who has all bad deeds and names in history of Pakistan, he has given a Pakistan a very very 'devine' document. Now those 'haram-khors' whom were celebrating his hanging by Supreme Court of Pakistan are putting all efforts for that constitution?
Check, where all your political elites are putting their eggs - it is a basket of imperialism AND such political corrupt mafia will provide you and coming generations with anything good. It is like fools paradise.
So live with your narrative and let live me with mine. In this world such accounts will never be settled.

 

[Silverblaze]

Constitution is a chain of command of any country. Why does a captain follows orders from a major? Its the rule. Tomorow if sindh says we reject the constitution and form a new country what will be the reaction. Takfiris and nationalists rejected every constitution both sponsored by india. If u dont like this constitution amend it make a new one.

Same former president made objective resolution part of the constitution and implemented it once again.

 

[-blitzkrieg-]

We are talking right now. The Supreme Court of today decides the matters for me today, not some PCO judge of old.

Soldiers who break their oaths not only bring disgrace to their service but also go against the direct orders of Quaid-e-Azam.

Always know what context it was said under..This was about British officers that refused to obey Jinnah during Kashmir war.It was a message to those goras..

However he was himself the biggest proponent of 'law of necessity' and that was depicted through some of his actions.

And frankly in his times there was a different post ww2 hitler-bitten world. In today's world hybrid models are needed to exist and thats why things like NCA exist.

Supreme Court itself is a servant of the people..It is accountable to President and Supreme judicial Commission.

You conveniently forget Musharaf was a President when he imposed emergency. Thats why when Musharaf as a president called SJC on CJ Iftikhar, Iftikhar Chaudhary refused to obey the order,so he lost relevance upon emergency when a new bench was derived.And then this happened.

On 24 November 2007, a seven panel larger bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice Abdul Hameed Dogor, directed the chief election commissioner and the government to declare Pervez Musharraf President for a second term by 1 December, and said that President Musharraf shall relinquish the office of the chief of army staff (COAS) before taking oath as civilian president.The Supreme Court also validated the imposition of emergency and the promulgation of the Provisional Constitution Order issued by the Chief of the Army Staff.

CJ Iftikhar then tried to create mutiny in Army and government ranks asking them not to obey the president as a supremem authority.Isnt that a treason?How dare he challenged a presidents power to impose emergency?

CJ Iftikhar was also a PCO judge ,how come your principle-sticking fcktards like Aitzaz Ahsan rallied behind him?? If you dont follow PCO judges why should you be concerned about this emergency anyway since it was a PCO judge who tried to stop it in first place.