RazPaK
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2010
- Messages
- 14,056
- Reaction score
- -49
- Country
- Location
What does Article 62 & 63 say??
To not be a kaafir. And look at all kaafirs crying about it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does Article 62 & 63 say??
Elected governments have a much harder time trying to get constitutional amendments through compared to arm-twisting dictators. Evil seeds planted by dictators grown into might huge trees over the years for feeble democracies to cut. Usually they can only prune, and everybody suffers, just like the present situation.
But who will remove them? The evil acts of dictators live on and on because those who come after them are too weak to do what is right.
That is why I said that previous governments could be given benefit of doubt. But this government had absolutely no hurdle to pass an amendment on this law. They legalized all their looting in a matter of days, they have plundered the coffers, so why can't do just one good thing?
Previous government had a fair chance to amend this moronic article - actually lawmakers are afraid of mullah based repercussions.
This election commission should rename itself as the Zardari commission. Since coming on and pretending to be impartial it has danced to the tunes of PPP and I don't expect this ECP to conduct free and fair elections.
Fakhru bhai - you have a career as a belly dancer in Zardari's court!
No way will these corrupt 5 men, ever allow overseas Pakistanis to even vote. PPP has no overseas vote. PPP's votebank is jhahil gawaar or the corrupt.
I beg to differ - it's only the government of Pakistan which can file a case of treason under the article 6 & the hearing authority is apex court not some session court. Besides you can't reject one's nomination without already established conviction.
Previous government had a fair chance to amend this moronic article - actually lawmakers are afraid of mullah based repercussions.
agree but The SC has already termed the acts of 3rd November as Treason, The responsibility of the Federal govt is to punish him. "Whether he has committed treason or not" is something courts have to decide and they have already done that. And since its established that he has committed treason he surely cant participate in the elections
Previous government had a fair chance to amend this moronic article - actually lawmakers are afraid of mullah based repercussions.
The PPP has been accusing the ECP of taking orders from media and SC...you accuse them of PPP orders?
Yeh khula tazaad nhn?
Had court declared him a traitor he (Musharaf) wouldn't have been moving freely in the country. The verdict does not address Musharaf directly, court had asked government to launch the proceedings against perpetrators behind that unconstitutional act of November 3rd. In short, he wasn't convicted - if he was then Mr. Ahsan Iqbal would have made his conviction the basis of his today's petition.
I will try to find the court order but thing is discussed in media that courts declared mush "GHASIB" even yesterday in Tal Tak this thing was being discussed.
And he can move freely in country, the only institution who can stop him is federal govt. They are responsible to prosecute him
No sir, justice choudhry is not that generous to allow him move freely in the country. Declaring his act unconstitutional and declaring him a traitor are two different things.
Yesterdays pakistan tv was so funny i could not stop laughing.
We had a fake degree holder crying on telly before he was sent to jail
A mullah having to sing the national anthem
A guy having to spell...economics
Another having to go through verse of the koran and kept get getting it wrong.
It went form the sublime to the ridiculous
The best bit of pakistan tv i have watched in years.
...
Tell me anything REAL of the SC they have implemented?
This is the era of Noora Kushti in Pakistan.