Abu Zolfiqar
Rest in Peace
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2009
- Messages
- 22,555
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
Don't be sorry! Getting things right is important. Enjoy your time in D.C. - not only do we have good weather in September, people are fresh back from vacation and ready to deal with new material.
good city with friendly and approachable people......condition of the roads in nation’s capital has left me a bit disappointed though, I must say.
compounded by the fact that people here can't drive even if their lives depended on it
"I doubt personally that the central leadership of Al Qaeda is in North Wazirstan...key figures all captured in Pakistani cities, you have to hide in plain sight...Karachi...Lahore...whatever"
and when were all those key figures arrested? Most of them were captured right after, or a few years after 9/11 (e.g. Bin AlShibh, KSM etc.)
the idea of his statement was that FATA is no longer becoming a 'safe-haven’ (as western media puts it) to Al Qaeda or other militant groups. We never had a scourge of terrorism or terrorists until the US-led invasion in 2001, mind you.
Please also familiarize yourself with the political realities. Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) is in charge of Karachi. It’s an ultra-secular and staunch opponent of extremism and extremist groups. Terrorists have no ’haven’ in Karachi –they would be targeted; especially nowdays when Pakistan has faced the increase in terrorist attacks against our country.
Peshawar, I believe, was mentioned separately earlier in the talk. But maybe I mistook "whatever" for "Peshawar"?
Peshawar still has troubled areas –very specific areas and outskirts, where some sympathetics may be residing. Once again, on the aggregate level –AQ has no base or support in Pakistan. I'll be very frank with you, since I myself am a no-bullsh*t no games-playing guy.
Peshawar has taken the brunt of terrorist attacks….I know people personally who have suffered losses. One would have a lot of nerve to think that the citizens of Peshawar sympathize with or condone terrorism or terrorists.
Afghan taleban, sure maybe –but that is due more in part to a rugged & porous border; there are civilians who feel that U.S/NATO presence in Afghanistan is counter-productive and that they must vacate the country at once.
I don't know what your political affiliations are; I'm not very interested to know either. But you should know that the U.S. and the President of 65% of Kabul (Mr. Karzai) will have to work out a political solution with taleban and pro-taleban militiamen who are willing to work towards unification of Afghan masses, even if it means sitting in opposition (or something to that extent).
If all these mighty armies were not able to subdue the taleban in 9 years of being there (despite all the resources) then I wouldnt subscribe to the notion that any ''surge'' or other purely military maneuver would yield any results.
We want a long-term, viable and sustainable solution to the Afghan conflict. As a neighbour of the land-locked country with strong links to Afghanistan (economic, partly ethnic, etc.) we are more than just a stake-holder here. You know as well as I do that as long as Afghanistan soil (which is under yours and NATO control at this particular moment) can not/should not/WILL not be used for anti-Pakistan activity.
Our leaders may be overly passive, but our military is not.
It’s easy for outsiders to analyze our affairs without looking at day to day ground realities….this is something that the Westerners and other outsiders need to learn to do
p.s. if the Americans really want to find Mullah Omar, I'm sure it wouldnt be difficult. He himself once stated that he would never leave Afghanistan; last time he was in Pakistan I believe he was in Peshawar seeking treatment for his eye condition. That was well over a decade ago.
If you have any intel or know something I don't, please do share with me. I like having up to date information.
Last edited: