What's new

mughals were Not Turks.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vishvamitra

BANNED
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
182
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
India
Mughals weren't Turks
They were from barlas tribe ( Mongolian origin )

Babur was a direct descendant of timur he was a minor noble of the Barlas, who were Mongols that had been turkified

Thats why in persians and hindustani, we called them Mughal/Mongol.

Just wanted to post this simple fact because people dont know about their last empire.
 
.
the last mughal was a good guy.. I rather like him..
 
.
What are you talking about? Everyone is a Turk.

Arabs and Persians don't exist, they are actually TURK.
language doesn't matter ppl will flip out ( especially Persian ) if i say x person spoke Arabic thus he is Arab

the fact is Mughal were from Mongolian tribe named Barlas that had been turkfied , the official language of Mughal was Persian and Mughal is the Arabic/Persian word for Mongolian .
 
. .
the last mughal was a good guy.. I rather like him..
Got royally screwed.

His sons beheaded and heads presented in a plate.

Died in a tower in burma.

The last empire was the British Raj and before that the Sikh Empire. Try to get your facts right.
Bahawalpur State.
Baloch States
Khanates of North
Wali of Swat/emirate of Swat
and many more.

There were hundreds of tribute states, who paid taxes to brits.
 
.
Barlas tribe are Mongols with a Turkic admixture and they adopted Persian language. They intermarried with Persians, Turks and Rajput nobles when they arrived in South Asia.
 
.
Got royally screwed.

His sons beheaded and heads presented in a plate.

Died in a tower in burma.


Bahawalpur State.
Baloch States
Khanates of North
Wali of Swat/emirate of Swat
and many more.

There were hundreds of tribute states, who paid taxes to brits.
whats that got to do with anything... he was not responsible for decline of mughals.. he was a legit poet too..
 
.
The dynasty was founded by a Chagatai Turkic prince named Bābur (reigned 1526–30), who was descended from the Turkic conqueror Timur (Tamerlane) on his father’s side and from Chagatai, second son of the Mongol ruler Genghis Khan, on his mother’s side. Ousted from his ancestral domain in Central Asia, Bābur turned to India to satisfy his appetite for conquest.
Look this is from your masters website. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mughal-dynasty

lol at this thread. Its impossible to teach indians history because their living in la la land. Their history is 20million years supposedly lol. The last 19million of that is probably slavery. Thats normal because its in their dna and genes to be slaves. They love the british who slaved them and starved millions of them to death.
 
.
He was definitely Turkic. He spoke the chagatai language (as any person would know who has heard of Tuzk-e Babri would know). He claimed descent from Changez through his mother, but there is little doubt that he was first and foremost a Turkic ruler. Of course one could make an argument that the latter (lesser Mughals, post Shah Alam) were not Turkic, and there is a case for that, but Babur himself was as Turkic as they come.
 
.
Mughals were from Central Asia, Babur was from ferghana, Uzbekistan to be precise. His ancestors were from Mongolia. I have a family history book which has been updated every 50 years.. dates back to 1589. Includes the complete history of my bloodline. Doubt if anyone else still has something similiar nowadays

The language it is written in seems to change from generation to generation several times which indicates that they adapted the language every time the conquered and started to rule an area but most of it is in Persian
 
Last edited:
.
Mughals were from Central Asia, Babur was from ferghana, Uzbekistan to be precise. His ancestors were from Mongolia. I have a family history book which has been updated every 50 years.. dates back to 1589. Includes the complete history of my bloodline. Doubt if anyone else still has something similiar nowadays

The language it is written in seems to change from generation to generation several times which indicates that they adapted the language every time the conquered and started to rule an area but most of it is in Persian

You are right.

This book seems interesting, can it or parts of it be shared ? I follow this subject closely.
 
.
The last empire was the British Raj and before that the Sikh Empire. Try to get your facts right.
British yes. Sikhs ? Nope. It was like wat ? 1/8 of otger empires ?

The dynasty was founded by a Chagatai Turkic prince named Bābur (reigned 1526–30), who was descended from the Turkic conqueror Timur (Tamerlane) on his father’s side and from Chagatai, second son of the Mongol ruler Genghis Khan, on his mother’s side. Ousted from his ancestral domain in Central Asia, Bābur turned to India to satisfy his appetite for conquest.
Look this is from your masters website. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mughal-dynasty

lol at this thread. Its impossible to teach indians history because their living in la la land. Their history is 20million years supposedly lol. The last 19million of that is probably slavery. Thats normal because its in their dna and genes to be slaves. They love the british who slaved them and starved millions of them to death.
You know what we achived is something your dumb ancestors cant even achive in 1000s of youers one of the main invantion is Numeral system.

In last 5000 years, maybe we were only under outsiders for 1000 years. While we ruled Far away colonies in south east asia. Can yoy show me one single Antolian empire ? No, you cant.


Whats your identity ? Basterd childs of Turks ? IRAN? half breed Aelrmenains ? No even you dont onow what you are because your whole nation was raped by almost every one since from greeks to turks. Since birth of civilization.

You rape products claiming Turkik lineage (4% to 10%) is like me claiming Austroloid heritage (10 to 20%).

So basterds of Rurope and Asia. First look at the mirrmirrorsand decide what you are.
 
.
The Turks were a people in Central Asia who had their hay days well before the Mongols. They had a big Turk empire there, i read in a history book but dont remember when. They are closely related to mongols. But the thing to remember is that there was a Turk empire first and a Mongol empire much later. Today countries like Turkey chose this name partly in remembrance of that past glory. And more importantly it was pre-islam glory.
 
Last edited:
.
Leave those guys dude, they are not treated as Turks, Arabs by any nation on earth. They satisfy their anxiety and falsehood like this.

British yes. Sikhs ? Nope. It was like wat ? 1/8 of otger empires ?


You know what we achived is something your dumb ancestors cant even achive in 1000s of youers one of the main invantion is Numeral system.

In last 5000 years, maybe we were only under outsiders for 1000 years. While we ruled Far away colonies in south east asia. Can yoy show me one single Antolian empire ? No, you cant.


Whats your identity ? Basterd childs of Turks ? IRAN? half breed Aelrmenains ? No even you dont onow what you are because your whole nation was raped by almost every one since from greeks to turks. Since birth of civilization.

You rape products claiming Turkik lineage (4% to 10%) is like me claiming Austroloid heritage (10 to 20%).

So basterds of Rurope and Asia. First look at the mirrmirrorsand decide what you are.

Leave those guys dude, they are not treated as Turks, Arabs by any nation on earth. They satisfy their anxiety and falsehood like this.

British yes. Sikhs ? Nope. It was like wat ? 1/8 of otger empires ?


You know what we achived is something your dumb ancestors cant even achive in 1000s of youers one of the main invantion is Numeral system.

In last 5000 years, maybe we were only under outsiders for 1000 years. While we ruled Far away colonies in south east asia. Can yoy show me one single Antolian empire ? No, you cant.


Whats your identity ? Basterd childs of Turks ? IRAN? half breed Aelrmenains ? No even you dont onow what you are because your whole nation was raped by almost every one since from greeks to turks. Since birth of civilization.

You rape products claiming Turkik lineage (4% to 10%) is like me claiming Austroloid heritage (10 to 20%).

So basterds of Rurope and Asia. First look at the mirrmirrorsand decide what you are.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom