Mughals were Indo-Iranic not Turkic People

[Rain]

sorry for weak English, English is not my First Language.

Answer to Jap @Nihonjin1051 and Turk Member @atatwolf
The Glory of the Mughal Empire | Page 31




1)Zahir-ud-din Muhammad Babur was an Uzbek Muslim who Founded Mughal Empire.
he was 100% Turkic
2)but Mother of Humayun was a IRANIAN QUEEN Maham Begam
Maham Begum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
so we can say that Humayun was atlast 60% Iranian and 40% Turkish.

3)Mother of Akbar Hamida Banu Begam, 'Maryam Makani' was also an Iranian Queen and she was born in Sindh,South Asia.
Hamida Banu Begum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
so basically, Akbar was an Iranian-Turkish Male

3)Jodha Bai, Mother of Jahangir is was 100% Rajput (Indic) Queen.
Mariam-uz-Zamani - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jahangir was "like" 60% INDIC, 30% Iranian and 10% Turkish Emperor of South Asia.

4) Mother of Shah Jahan was Again a Rajput Princess Rajkumari Shri Manavati Baiji Lall Sahiba
so, Shah Jahan was Indian-Iranian King not a Turkish king.


all i want to say is Stay in your Japan and Fake Turkish Nation, our kings have nothing common with your Bac

What a stupid way of knowing origin of muhgals, Vedic science at best.
@Moderators how come such threads are allowed to mock and twist established History? Open discussion does not meant non sense discussions there should a clear cut line to differentiate.

 

[East or West India Best]

What a stupid way of knowing origin of muhgals, Vedic science at best.
@Moderators how come such threads are allowed to mock and twist established History? Open discussion does not meant non sense discussions there should a clear cut line to differentiate.

it's our history not yours so mind your own business.

 

[Rain]

it's our history not yours so mind your own business.

You insists on your ignorance, welcome

 

[Gufi]

I wonder when did mothers change the family tree ?? The blood line is always from the male, I do not know if it is the same in India but for Muslims the blood line and family name is always from the paternal side. But this argument is meaningless, stop bringing it up to prove something. And OP either edit Jap, or I will mark that thread negative. It is not a polite term to use, try Japanese instead and Turkish also. Because you said your English is poor I think it was a mistake.

sorry for weak English, English is not my First Language.

 

[Kabira]

Why Pakistani Muslims burning, whats there link with mughal and mughal history???
Iran,Turkey,East Turkmenistan,Afghan and central Asian members are welcome to participate.....

Mourya had little to do with India a part from conquering it.

 

[Kabira]

Do you recognize your Mauryan ancestry???

Maurya was from north west subcontinent now Pakistan, he conquered Bihar with help of north west tribes From historical sources he was seen in indus valley before he became king.

So we know he conquered India with tribes from north west/Pakistan, he was seen in indus valley. Despite all these historical facts we are lead to believe he was born in Bihar because of location of capital? lmao So take off your avatar and replace it with Ghandi jee.

 

[Multani]

sorry for weak English, English is not my First Language.

Answer to Jap @Nihonjin1051 and Turk Member @atatwolf
The Glory of the Mughal Empire | Page 31




1)Zahir-ud-din Muhammad Babur was an Uzbek Muslim who Founded Mughal Empire.
he was 100% Turkic
2)but Mother of Humayun was a IRANIAN QUEEN Maham Begam
Maham Begum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
so we can say that Humayun was atlast 60% Iranian and 40% Turkish.

3)Mother of Akbar Hamida Banu Begam, 'Maryam Makani' was also an Iranian Queen and she was born in Sindh,South Asia.
Hamida Banu Begum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
so basically, Akbar was an Iranian-Turkish Male

3)Jodha Bai, Mother of Jahangir is was 100% Rajput (Indic) Queen.
Mariam-uz-Zamani - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jahangir was "like" 60% INDIC, 30% Iranian and 10% Turkish Emperor of South Asia.

4) Mother of Shah Jahan was Again a Rajput Princess Rajkumari Shri Manavati Baiji Lall Sahiba
so, Shah Jahan was Indian-Iranian King not a Turkish king.


all i want to say is Stay in your Japan and Fake Turkish Nation, our kings have nothing common with your Bac

a really stupid post and thread. Among Central Asian Muslims, race, culture, and family name are through the father. No one cares who the mother was. If the father was Turkic, then the Mughals were all Turkic.

Shah Ismail Safavi had a caucasian mother. But he was nothing but an Azeri Turk!

 

[Kabira]

You might be killed in your country for apostasy /blasphemy by recognizing your Hindu vedic roots.
Maurya Empire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What does this even mean? Replace your avatar with ghandi and change your id, it doesn't suite you.

 

[Kabira]

Why, does mourya anyway a related to Pakistan ???

Yep he is, only us are allowed to talk about him.

 

[Multani]

You might be killed in your country for apostasy /blasphemy by recognizing your Hindu vedic roots.
Maurya Empire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

wasn't ashoka a budhist, who rejected Hinduism?

Chandragupta Maurya - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mourya empire started here.

Then extended to

how come Maghada, in the map above, doesn't include modern day Bihar??

Chandragupta Maurya - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mourya empire started here.

Then extended to

the location of Taxila and Bodh Gaya and Pataliputra are all wrong in the map above. Mathura too.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

how come Maghada, in the map above, doesn't include modern day Bihar??

It is, Patna/Pataliputra is in modern day Bihar.

 

[qamar1990]

sorry for weak English, English is not my First Language.

Answer to Jap @Nihonjin1051 and Turk Member @atatwolf
The Glory of the Mughal Empire | Page 31




1)Zahir-ud-din Muhammad Babur was an Uzbek Muslim who Founded Mughal Empire.
he was 100% Turkic
2)but Mother of Humayun was a IRANIAN QUEEN Maham Begam
Maham Begum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
so we can say that Humayun was atlast 60% Iranian and 40% Turkish.

3)Mother of Akbar Hamida Banu Begam, 'Maryam Makani' was also an Iranian Queen and she was born in Sindh,South Asia.
Hamida Banu Begum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
so basically, Akbar was an Iranian-Turkish Male

3)Jodha Bai, Mother of Jahangir is was 100% Rajput (Indic) Queen.
Mariam-uz-Zamani - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jahangir was "like" 60% INDIC, 30% Iranian and 10% Turkish Emperor of South Asia.

4) Mother of Shah Jahan was Again a Rajput Princess Rajkumari Shri Manavati Baiji Lall Sahiba
so, Shah Jahan was Indian-Iranian King not a Turkish king.


all i want to say is Stay in your Japan and Fake Turkish Nation, our kings have nothing common with your Bac

your math is off
humayun should be 50 percent iranian not 60
jahangir should 50 percent indic not 60
this explains the kings supposedly but what about the thousands if not millions of other mughals who cam with zahir u din babur???

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Maurya was from north west subcontinent now Pakistan, he conquered Bihar with help of north west tribes From historical sources he was seen in indus valley before he became king.

So we know he conquered India with tribes from north west/Pakistan, he was seen in indus valley. Despite all these historical facts we are lead to believe he was born in Bihar because of location of capital? lmao So take off your avatar and replace it with Ghandi jee.

He used tribes from the NW, and many peoples all over India that the Nanda's pissed off, including peoples in Pataliputra, so what? Mauryas were a continuations of the Magadhan Empire, just another family.

Look at every successor of the Mauryas, they dont even remotely look central asian or whatever.

 

[Multani]

It is, Patna/Pataliputra is in modern day Bihar.

this map shows about right locations, but it is interesting to know that Magadha does not include northern Bihar [ north of Patna ]

 

[Water Car Engineer]

this map shows about right locations, but it is interesting to know that Magadha does not include northern Bihar [ north of Patna ]

That area was pretty much similar to Magadha.