What's new

Mughals/ Other Muslim Rulers slashed out of Indian history textbooks

Nobody cares.

People in Punjab study Nawaz and Shahbaz Sharif in primary school.

Evolution fuzzed us up
 
whos ancestors were in slavery for 800yrs
Shows your intelligence,Actually it was the Pakistanis who were slaves of the foreign invaders not us! We fought and reclaimed our land. So lets see the islamic empires were firmly established during 1360s and were destroyed in 1730's. Not considering Hemu Vikram Aditya and other uprising against Mughals/Muslims
 
Shows your intelligence,Actually it was the Pakistanis who were slaves of the foreign invaders not us! We fought and reclaimed our land. So lets see the islamic empires were firmly established during 1360s and were destroyed in 1730's. Not considering Hemu Vikram Aditya and other uprising against Mughals/Muslims


Pakiatanis are still slave to Politicians
 
You clearly have no clue about history,If we consider the theory true then i am an Aryan and people living in South India are mainly Dravidian so my ancestors raped them if we accept that theory as well as accept that the Aryan invaders actually raped the Dravidian women or not.Though sad part for you is that this theory is bogus!

Bogus???? Aww Man Your Delusions Are Really Deep.It Has Been Scientifically Proven That Aryans Came From Outside

http://beyondheadlines.in/2014/04/american-scientist-proves-brahmins-are-foreigners/

https://gnxp.nofe.me/2017/04/20/aryan-marauders-from-the-steppe-came-to-india-yes-they-did/
 
Really sad for Indians to erase 1000 year old Muslim rule history.

Why lie and do the wrong thing???


Muslim invasion and rule was also great for Mahastara, history should be fairly mentioned, dont do the British thing who erase, lie and built thier own versions of history.

Balanced honest and truth is a fact and should remain controversial free.
 
Really sad for Indians to erase 1000 year old Muslim rule history. Why lie and do the wrong thing???
Muslim invasion and rule was also great for Mahastara, history should be fairly mentioned, dont do the British thing who erase, lie and built thier own versions of history.

Balanced honest and truth is a fact and should remain controversial free.
It is the same in Pakistan, for eg Ranjit Singh was the only Sikh ruler whose empire extended right upto Kabul. But in Pakistani history text books,there is hardly any mention of Ranjit Singh. On the other hand Aurangzeb is glorified, in fact it was Aurangzeb who jailed his father and murdered his brothers for the throne.
 
Back
Top Bottom