What's new

Mr. Jinnah's Anniversary Today : Liberator of muslims of Two modern day countries : Dawn : Article b

You are incorrect.
Yes the All India Muslim League was founded in East Bengal, but most of the support came from West Pakistan and Muslims from the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh.

But it does not include Punjab. so my statement was accurate.

Bengalis, Bhaiyyas of North India & Sindhis have fought for Pakistan much earlier than Punjab. That is a indisputable historical fact. Punjab only joined right before the independence in 1946.
 
But it does not include Punjab. so my statement was accurate.

Bengalis, Bhaiyyas of North India & Sindhis have fought for Pakistan much earlier than Punjab. That is a indisputable historical fact. Punjab only joined right before the independence in 1946.
Whether Punjab joined Pakistan last is true or not, I don't know.

But I do know for a fact that most of the support for Pakistan came from "West Pakistan" and the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh.
 
You are incorrect.
Yes the All India Muslim League was founded in East Bengal, but most of the support came from West Pakistan and Muslims from the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh.




In a united India Muslims would made 450 Million.

A United India Hindus would have made up 900 million.

Hindus outnumber Muslims from 3:1.

Go get your mathematics right! :lol:
Again your math is wrong bro
 
Whether Punjab joined Pakistan last is true or not, I don't know.

But I do know for a fact that most of the support for Pakistan came from "West Pakistan" and the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh.

What west Pakistan? Only Sindhis were supporting the idea. Frontier Gandhi Khān Abdul Ghaffār Khān (Bacha Khan) was vehemently opposing the idea and was a staunch supporter of Congress. Balochistan/Kalat was not even in the picture.
 
Again your math is wrong bro
Yes I am aware of that.
It is 2:1

Point is Muslims would only make 30-33% in a United South Asia.

And I Thank Allah, that a United India never worked out.
 
Yes I am aware of that.
It is 2:1

Point is Muslims would only make 30-33% in a United South Asia.

And Thank Allah, that a United India never worked out.
We don't believe in Allah,so we will thank our God that a United India never worked out and we like Jinnah for that
 
We don't believe in Allah,so we will thank our God that a United India never worked out and we like Jinnah for that
I didn't mean you or Hindus.

It was a typo, because I type quickly. I corrected my post.
 
I didn't mean you or Hindus.

It was a typo, because I type quickly. I corrected my post.
I have a question for you,I see you said you guys would have been a minority so wanted a separate country where you can be majority,is that true
 
I have a question for you,I see you said you guys would have been a minority so wanted a separate country where you can be majority,is that true
Yes that is correct. Why should we be a minority in our own lands when we form the majority in our lands.?

What west Pakistan? Only Sindhis were supporting the idea. Frontier Gandhi Khān Abdul Ghaffār Khān (Bacha Khan) was vehemently opposing the idea and was a staunch supporter of Congress. Balochistan/Kalat was not even in the picture.
Most people did not listen to Bacha Khan. Bacha Khan was an idiot. Bacha Khan believed in non-violent protests (the Gandhian tactics) lol :lol:
 
Yes that is correct. Why should we be a minority in our own lands when we form the majority?
So can the minorites in your country apply the same logic and ask to separate where they are majority or people like ahamadias who where Muslims until 74 in Pakistan and are not now.
 
So can the minorites in your country apply the same logic and ask to separate where they are majority or people like ahamadias who where Muslims until 74 in Pakistan and are not now.
No they cannot, because the minorities do not form a majority in any province.

Nice try with your pathetic logic.

Thats not the only reason. Why should we share the same land with the Hindus of India? People who have vastly different beliefs from ours.

Why should we share our resources with the Hindu community of India?
 
No they cannot, because the minorities do not form a majority in any province.

Nice try with your pathetic logic.
So you will support them if they are in majority in a particular area ,right
 
So you will support them if they are in majority ,right
If it becomes clear that people who have different beliefs from ours are a majority in a region like Sindh, then Sindh should become a different country then.

If Sindh was a Buddhist majority region for example, then Sindh should not be part of Pakistan or India.

So you will support them if they are in majority in a particular area ,right
How do you define a minority?

Minorities in Pakistan only make 3%. Muslims make about 97%.
 
Is that what they teach you in schools? what a retard

Jinnah did not want to partition the country. He wanted to use the threat of partition to negotiate a better political deal for Muslims but Nehru did not negotiate forcing the partition. In the end Muslims of Subcontinent lost due to partition. I am pretty sure, in hindsight, Jinnah would have used an alternative approach.
 
If it becomes clear that people who have different beliefs from ours are a majority in a region like Sindh, then Sindh should become a different country then.

If Sindh was a Buddhist majority region for example, then Sindh should not be part of Pakistan or India.


How do you define a minority?

Minorities in Pakistan only make 3%. Muslims make about 97%.
Good to know you support minorities separation in the areas they are in majority.i will reply to this a little later
 
Back
Top Bottom