What's new

Mr. Jinnah's Anniversary Today : Liberator of muslims of Two modern day countries : Dawn : Article b

Shahzaz ud din

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 12, 2017
Messages
7,877
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Mr. Jinnah's Anniversary Today : Liberator of muslims of Two modern day countries : Dawn : Article by Stanley Wolpert;




Special report: The Testament of Mr Jinnah 1876-1948


A life well spent on all counts

By Stanley Wolpert

59b3d7607bb63.jpg


Cigar in hand, Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah looking on quizzically as he was being photographed at the Cecil Hotel, Simla, in 1944. | Photo: National Archives Islamabad

ON August 11, 1947, when Mohammad Ali Jinnah addressed the first democratically elected Constituent Assembly of his newly independent nation, he told Pakistan’s political leaders that “the first duty of government” was to maintain “law and order … so that the life, property, and religious beliefs of its subjects are fully protected by the state.” Their “second duty,” he continued, was to prevent and punish “bribery and corruption. That really is a poison. We must put that down … as soon as possible.” Another “curse,” he added, “was black-marketing … a colossal crime against society, in our distressed condition, when we constantly face shortage of food.”

“If we want to make this great state of Pakistan happy and prosperous we should wholly and solely concentrate on the well-being of the people, and especially of the masses and the poor … If you will work … together in a spirit that every one of you, no matter to what community he belongs, no matter what relations he had with you in the past, no matter what is his colour, caste or creed, is first, second and last a citizen of this state with equal rights, privileges and obligations, there will be no end to the progress you will make. You are free, you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place of worship.

You may belong to any religion or caste or creed – that has nothing to do with the business of the state … We are all citizens and equal citizens of one state.” Mohammad Ali Jinnah devoted the last two decades of his life to the relentless struggle to realise his brilliant and beautiful dream of an independent state of Pakistan, born just 70 years ago out of the Muslim majority regions of partitioned British India.

Sent to London by his father to study business management, young Jinnah’s fascination with politics was ignited by the Congress Party’s president Dadabhai Naoroji, a Parsi whose campaign in the British parliament, demanding liberty, equality and justice for all Indians, lured Jinnah to work hard for him, helping Congress’s ‘Grand Old Man’ win his seat by only three votes, after which he was called ‘Mr. Narrow-Majority’.

Jinnah joined the Congress as Dadabhai’s secretary, and enrolled in the City of London’s Lincoln’s Inn, deciding to study law instead of business. His portrait still hangs in that Inn’s hall, its only Asian-born barrister to become governor general of a Commonwealth nation. After he returned to India, Jinnah also joined the Muslim League, brilliantly drafting the Lucknow Pact in l9l6, which was adopted by both the Congress and the Muslim League, as their post-World War I demand for Dominion status in Britain’s Commonwealth.
He launched his singularly successful career as a barrister in Bombay, rather than in his smaller birthplace, Karachi, which was destined to become Pakistan’s first capital. Before the end of the War, Jinnah‘s negotiating skills and wise moderation earned him the sobriquet, ‘Best Ambassador of Hindu-Muslim Unity’.

Throughout World War I, both Jinnah and Gandhi had supported the British cause, as did the Indian princes. Brave Muslims of Punjab were recruited to help hold the Maginot Line in France, and to fight and die in Mesopotamia. Congress and the League had hoped that such loyal service would be rewarded with freedom at the end of the War, or at least the promise of Dominion status. Instead, India was forced to accept martial ‘law’ regulations, extended indefinitely, and a brutal massacre of unarmed Sikh peasants in Amritsar’s Jallianwala Bagh, leaving 400 innocents dead and over 1,200 wounded.



59b3d7602302f.jpg


Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah and Miss Fatima Jinnah enjoying a boat ride, possibly in Dhaka, in the early 1940s. Standing on the left [wearing sherwani] is Khawaja Nazimuddin, who was at the time the Premier of Bengal. | Photo: The Press Information Department, Ministry of Information, Broadcasting & National Heritage, Islamabad (PID)

Jinnah immediately resigned from the prestigious ‘Muslim seat’ from Bombay he’d been elected to on the Governor General’s Council, arguing that the “fundamental principles of justice have been uprooted and the constitutional rights of the people have been violated at a time when there is no real danger to the state, by an over-fretful and incompetent bureaucracy which is neither responsible to the people nor in touch with real public opinion”.

Gandhi launched his first nationwide Satyagraha in response to Britain’s post-War ‘black acts’ and the Punjab murders. Jinnah, on his part, tried unsuccessfully to caution him against inciting Congress’s masses, who cheered the Mahatma’s revolutionary calls to boycott everything British, including all imported cotton goods from Britain’s midlands, and every British school as well as all commercial and legal institutions.

Jinnah cautioned Gandhi that his movement would lead to greater violence and disaster, but Gandhi insisted that non-violence (Ahimsa) was sacred to him, and Jinnah was booed out of Congress’s largest meeting for calling their Great Soul – Mahatma Gandhi – “Mister” Gandhi. Jinnah felt obliged to resign from Congress, and returned to London to live, and practise law, in Hampstead with his sister, Fatima, and teen-aged daughter Dina. But soon Liaquat Ali Khan and other League stalwarts convinced him to return to India to revitalise the Muslim League, over which he would preside for the rest of his life.

“We must stand on our own inherent strength … It is no use blaming others,” Jinnah told the League in Karachi. “It is no use expecting our enemies to behave differently.” To young Muslims who complained to him about the behaviour of inept League leaders, Jinnah replied, as he might admonish today’s youth: “It is your organisation … no use keeping out and finding faults with it. Come in, and … put it right.”

Faced with Congress’s revolutionary movement, from which most Muslim leaders were alienated, the British tried to win back mass support by holding provincial elections in 1937, devolving regional powers to popularly elected cabinets. Nehru campaigned most vigorously nationwide and led Congress to victory in seven of the 11 British Provinces. Jinnah’s Muslim League, however, faced with a number of competing Muslim regional parties, failed to capture even a single Province with a Muslim majority.

Young Nehru’s heady victory increased his arrogance and contempt for Jinnah, to whom he replied when Jinnah suggested joint cabinets for India’s large multi-ethnic provinces. “Line up!” Jawaharlal shouted. “There are only two parties” left in India, “Congress and the British”. Jinnah insisted, however, that there was a “Third Party; the Muslims!”

“Unless the parties learn to respect and fear each other,” Jinnah told the League, “there is no solid ground for any settlement. We have to organise our people, to build up the Muslim masses for a better world and for their immediate uplift, social and economic, and we have to formulate plans of a constructive and ameliorative character, to give immediate relief from the poverty and wretchedness from which they are suffering.”

59b3d7616e0a4.jpg


Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah with Khawaja Nazimuddin during the former’s visit to Dhaka in April, 1948. | Photo: The Press Information Department, Ministry of Information, Broadcasting & National Heritage, Islamabad (PID)

Jinnah never again attempted to convince Nehru to agree to Congress-League cabinets, no longer wishing to link the League to Congress’s lumbering bullock-cart of a Party, insisting that the Congress “has now killed every hope of Hindu-Muslim settlement in the right royal fashion of Fascism … We Muslims want no gifts … no concessions. We Muslims of India have made up our mind to secure full rights, but we shall have them as rights … The Congress is nothing but a Hindu body.”

In Lucknow, in December 1937, wearing his black astrakhan Jinnah cap and long dark sherwani, instead of a British barrister’s suit, Quaid-i-Azam (Great Leader) Jinnah presided over his League, assembled in the Raja of Mahmudabad’s garden. “Your foremost duty is to formulate a constructive programme of work for the people’s welfare … Equip yourselves as trained and disciplined soldiers. Create the feeling … of comradeship amongst yourselves. Work loyally, honestly and for the cause of your people and your country.

No individual or people can achieve anything without industry, suffering and sacrifice. There are forces which may bully you, tyrannize over you … But it is by going through this crucible of the fire of persecution which may be levelled against you … that a nation will emerge, worthy of its past glory and history, and will live to make the future history greater and more glorious. Eighty millions of Musalmans in India have nothing to fear. They have their destiny in their hands, and as a well-knit, solid, organised, united force can face any danger to its united front and wishes.”

Throughout 1938 and 1939 Jinnah devoted himself to building the strength of the League, advancing it from a few thousand members at Lucknow to half-a-million by March, l940, when the League held its greatest meeting, demanding the creation of Pakistan, in the beautiful imperial Mughal Gardens of Punjab’s mighty capital.“The Musalmans are a nation,” Jinnah announced. “The problem of India is not of an inter-communal character, but manifestly of an international one, and it must be treated as such.” To “secure the peace and happiness of the people of this subcontinent,”

Jinnah added, the British must divide India into “autonomous national states.” Pakistan was not mentioned in his speech, however, and every member of the press asked him the next day if he meant one or two new states, since Bengal’s Muslim leader, Fazlul Huq, had chaired the resolutions’ committee that proposed partition the day before Jinnah spoke. Jinnah knew by then that his lungs were fatally afflicted with cigarette smoke, coughing up blood.

He couldn’t wait for Congress and the British to agree to the birth of what later became Bangladesh. So he insisted that his League meant one Pakistan, though divided by a thousand miles of North India.
When the last British Viceroy, ‘Dickie’ Mountbatten, urged Jinnah to accept him as joint governor general of Pakistan as well as of independent India, the job Nehru offered Mountbatten, Jinnah refused, never charmed by the Royal Mountbattens, as was Nehru, insisting on serving himself as Pakistan’s governor general.

After seven decades, how many of the problems Jinnah defined at Pakistan’s birth have as yet been resolved? And of late senseless terrorist murders have been added to Pakistan’s list of dreadful crimes against its innocent, impoverished people, helpless women and children, as well as devout Muslims bent in their prayers even inside the most beautiful mosques of Karachi, Quetta, Lahore and elsewhere.

Jinnah worked tirelessly for Pakistan to become a great nation basking in the sunshine and joy of freedom, enriched by citizens of every faith – Parsis and Hindus, Christians and Jews, as well as Muslims of every sect – all working together, harmoniously helping each other to build this Land of the Pure into one of the world’s strongest, wisest, richest countries. That was what the Great Leader dreamed his nation could and would become long before Pakistan’s birth.



59b3d7607a960.jpg


Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah smiling as he was welcomed at the Supreme Court of Pakistan in Karachi in 1947. | Photo: The Press Information Department, Ministry of Information, Broadcasting & National Heritage, Islamabad (PID) It would never be easy, he knew, yet Jinnah tried his best to remind his followers of what they needed to do, shortly before Pakistan’s birth, when he had little more than one year left to breathe, losing more blood every day from his diseased lungs.

Often asked by disciples, “What are we fighting for? What are we aiming at?”, Jinnah replied: “It is not theocracy – not for a theocratic state. Religion is there, and religion is dear to us. All the worldly goods are nothing to us when we talk of religion, but there are other things which are very vital – our social life, our economic life …We Muslims have got everything … brains, intelligence, capacity and courage – virtues that nations must possess … But two things are lacking, and I want you to concentrate your attention on these.

One thing is that foreign domination from without and Hindu domination here, particularly in our economic life, has caused a certain degeneration of these virtues in us. We have lost the fullness of our noble character. And what is character? The highest sense of honour and the highest sense of integrity, conviction, incorruptibility, readiness at any time to efface oneself for the collective good of the nation.”

His legacy of wisdom was worthy of the Quaid-i-Azam, who lived a life honouring justice and fair play. Every Pakistani must remember that Jinnah’s fearless integrity would never sanction any terrorist murder, nor the violent abuse of any man, woman or child in his noble Land of the Pure.


The writer is a historian and a well-known biographer, among others, of Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Al Jinnah.

source :
 
Thank you Jinnah, you were right.

A United South Asia would have never worked it.
 
Jinnah did not want to partition the country. He wanted to use the threat of partition to negotiate a better political deal for Muslims but Nehru did not negotiate forcing the partition. In the end Muslims of Subcontinent lost due to partition. I am pretty sure, in hindsight, Jinnah would have used an alternative approach.
 
Jinnah did not want to partition the country. He wanted to use the threat of partition to negotiate a better political deal for Muslims but Nehru did not negotiate forcing the partition. In the end Muslims of Subcontinent lost due to partition. I am pretty sure, in hindsight, Jinnah would have used an alternative approach.
Muslims gained by partition.

You are flat out wrong.
 
Jinnah did not want to partition the country. He wanted to use the threat of partition to negotiate a better political deal for Muslims but Nehru did not negotiate forcing the partition. In the end Muslims of Subcontinent lost due to partition. I am pretty sure, in hindsight, Jinnah would have used an alternative approach.
Jinnah was for united india very aggressively till 1920s.. somewhat turned to separate country demand post 1931.. till 1945 it was ambiguous, as Jinnah demanded more provincial autonomy... nehru wanted strong center (due to his communist tilt may be)... so partition was inevitable...
 
Muslims gained by partition.

You are flat out wrong.

I am fine with that and many Indians would love to hear that.

Jinnah was for united india very aggressively till 1920s.. somewhat turned to separate country demand post 1931.. till 1945 it was ambiguous, as Jinnah demanded more provincial autonomy... nehru wanted strong center (due to his communist tilt may be)... so partition was inevitable...

Nehru steadfastly opposed the demands for separate electorate and one-third seats reserved for Muslims in the central legislature by Jinnah. Nehru saw that as divisive, regressive and continuation of British's Morley-Minto Reforms of 1909 which created separate electorates for Muslims to weaken the Indian struggle for Independence.
 
It was Nehru and Gandhi who were against Partition.

Even the British wanted to leave a united India.

I'm glad you agree that Partition was the right thing to do.

Because Hindus lost land they will never get back. :D

nation-remembers-fatima-jinnah-on-48th-death-anniversary-1436439298-2083.jpg


Thank you guys, you were right! :D
 
Don't know about others, but for me the creation of Pak is personal. For the Coat of Arms of the Ottoman Empire consisted of 2 flags - red one signifying Saltanat and the green one signifying Hilafet. Elhamdulillah both of them are fluttering with the kurban of blood and sweat on 24/7 basis. Hence, a special thanks for Rahmetli Jinnah. He has defended the honor of the Ottoman coat of arms in this Dunya, let it defend his honor in Ahiret.....
Ruhunuz shad olsun....
Seni seviyorum savunan adam...


upload_2017-9-11_16-11-41.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
upload_2017-9-11_20-25-36.png


It is the people who inhabited Pakistan (Mostly West Pakistanis) who demanded Pakistan.

Jinnah gladly was the spokeman of the All India Muslim League.

I have immense respect for Jinnah, that he single handly took on the British and the Indian National Congress.

Those retards such as the British, Gandhi, and Nehru were adamant for a united South Asia. :lol:

Good thing Jinnah showed up. :lol:
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-9-11_20-24-16.png
    upload_2017-9-11_20-24-16.png
    115.6 KB · Views: 52
Muslims gained by partition.

You are flat out wrong.
you are right, thats why we still have big muslim population.
Thank you Jinha you really did a great job. Many many thanks.
In fact instead of gandhi jayanti we should have a dedicated holiday to honor his selfless act.
Gandhi just fought for independence from british, but Jinnah saved India for eternity.

Just cant imagine how horrible the situation would have been. Africa or syria would have been nothing compared to united India.
 
you are right, thats why we still have big muslim population.

In fact instead of gandhi jayanti we should have a dedicated holiday to honor his selfless act.
Gandhi just fought for independence from british, but Jinnah saved India for eternity.

Just cant imagine how horrible the situation would have been. Africa or syria would have been nothing compared to united India.
So your point is?

Muslims in the majority provinces benefited politically.

Muslims got much more political power.

In a united India, Muslims would have been a minority of 30%.

So the Muslims won out.

Muslims benefited the most.

It is the Hindus who suffered the most. Hindus lost land they will never get back.

Hindus will never get back Pakistan or Bangladesh.

Anything else??? :lol:
 
It is the people who inhabited Pakistan (Mostly West Pakistanis) who demanded Pakistan.

Incorrect.

It was Bengalis who fought for Pakistan all along. In fact Punjabis are the last ones to join.

All India Muslim League (AIML) was routed in Punjab all through until the late 1930s.

In the 1937 elections for 175 seats, the Unionists of Punjab had won 95 seats, Congress 18 whereas the AIML had managed to win just one seat.

AIML won Punjab only once in 1946. Out of 175 seats, AIML won 73 seats, Congress won 51, the Sikh Akali dal 22 and the Unionists 20.
 
Incorrect.

It was Bengalis who fought for Pakistan all along. In fact Punjabis are the last ones to join.

All India Muslim League (AIML) was routed in Punjab all through until the late 1930s.

In the 1937 elections for 175 seats, the Unionists of Punjab had won 95 seats, Congress 18 whereas the AIML had managed to win just one seat.

AIML won Punjab only once in 1946. Out of 175 seats, AIML won 73 seats, Congress won 51, the Sikh Akali dal 22 and the Unionists 20.
You are incorrect.
Yes the All India Muslim League was founded in East Bengal, but most of the support came from West Pakistan and Muslims from the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh.

you are very good in mathematics keep it up. :tup:


In a united India Muslims would made 450 Million.

A United India Hindus would have made up 900 million.

Hindus outnumber Muslims from 2:1.

Go get your mathematics right! :lol:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom