What's new

Money laundering scam worth $10bn

this is pak police next few days after remand they will accept 50 or 100 bn$ also

Imran bhai ab tu "kalyug" hey.........police chotey Badmashon sey Bhataa leti hey aur baray "Badmash" police ku baskhshish detain hein..............ab tu Zadari & co he kafi hey ..dil mein reham aya tu plice ku bhi "nawaz" dein gey:smokin:
 
its pak police i never ever respect police without moterway police they work good and take respect from nation also
 
its pak police i never ever respect police without moterway police they work good and take respect from nation also

Sir jee...... repect tu sharif ...sharifon ki kertey hein..........while its universal fact that....in Pakistan Police Badmashon ki thekeydar hey, they are the only promoters of crimnals and crimes.........:cheesy:
As saying:once punjab police :police:went on strike in the govt of Ghulam Mustafa Khar....for a day or two (i dont remember well) and there was no any crime in the province in such duration.:agree:

BTW Imran bhai ....... The actual amount of scam of money transfer is $38 billions rather then $10 Billions as accused told yesterday according to the press news (I have posted above).
 
so you wana sent police to strike forever? i thing maximum 2 to5 bn is true
 
Just one question Pakistan's foreign exchange reserves never went beyond 16 billion dollars. How can 38 billion dollars be transferred out of the country unless offcourse the money came through hundi.
 
^ my point exactly.nobody has that much money in pakistan to do transactions of 10 to 30 billion dollars.nobody had more dollars than the state bank of pakistan which declined by 10 billion and in the itnerbank dollars have gone up by 1 billion .Rahman Malik is bullshi tting here there must be some other reason for going after these guys ..may be zardari was asking them for bhutta which they refused theres a rumor circulating around
 
NAB Okays probe against 3 forex companies Updated at: 1430 PST, Thursday, November 13, 2008
ISLAMABAD: National Accountability Bureau (NAB) has given a go ahead to an inquiry into the allegations regarding illegal business and money laundering against three forex companies.

The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) has sent the inquiry case of Kinashi Enterprise, AR Enterprise and Ahsan Enterprise to NAB.

The NAB approved a thorough investigation into the allegations regarding three companies’ involvement in corrupt practices and money laundering.

The three companies are facing allegations of being involved in illegal transfer of 50 million dollars and money laundering.
 
Senators question wisdom behind SBP move



By Ahmed Hassan

ISLAMABAD: The government on Wednesday admitted in Senate that $4 billion had been transferred abroad during the previous government’s rule under dubious SROs issued by former president Pervez Musharraf and prime minister Shaukat Aziz, who had kept the matter secret even from the finance ministry and the State Bank of Pakistan.

Responding to a scathing attack from both sides of the aisle against the SBP governor’s decision to increase discount and interest rates allegedly under IMF dictates, leader of the house and minister for inter-provincial coordination, Mian Raza Rabbani, agreed with legislators that the SBP should have waited for the conclusion of the debate in the Senate before making the decision.

Earlier, lawmakers criticised the government for what they termed bypassing parliament in accepting IMF conditionalities.

A couple of lawmakers called for the formation of a bipartisan committee, comprising members of both houses of parliament and economists, to review the IMF package and prepare in a month a roadmap for economic revival.

Taking the floor on a point of order, Ishaq Dar of the PML-N said that the State Bank could not be allowed to become ‘a state within state’. He said the rate cut decision might prove to be disastrous.

Prof Khurshid Ahmed of the Jamaat Islami said that the Senate was being treated in a ‘contemptuous manner’, adding that it was in the midst of a debate on economy and could have come up with suggestions for a turnaround.

He said there was no precedent in the 60-year history of the IMF that a country had recovered after adopting its package.

Leader of the opposition Kamil Ali Agha criticised the government for what he said succumbing to IMF conditionalities even before the release of bailout funds, adding there were reports that the price of gas was being raised by 51 per cent for industry.

“While interest rates are being reduced the world over, Islamabad has raised them as first pre-condition for the approval of the IMF package.” Criticising the government for haste in obtaining the approval of the Cabinet Committee on Privatisation for the sale of a profit-making unit, the Qadirpur gas field, which “clearly reflected its scant respect of parliament”. Ilyas Bliour of the Awami National Party said the SBP decision would plunge the country further into recession.

Kamran Murtaza of the JUI-F and Zafar Iqbal of the PPP expressed fears that the move would deepen the crisis in Pakistan, which was already facing a huge trade deficit, adding that increased cost of production would hurt its exports.

Parigul Agha of the PML-Q criticised President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani for not visiting the earthquake affected areas of Balochistan because “they value their lives more”.

Prof Khurshid Ahmed called for holding the former president, prime minister, bureaucrats and politicians accountable for “misusing powers and looting the exchequer”.

Opposing the proposed privatisation of the Qadirpur gas field, he said it would be a ‘national crime’ if a “highly-profitable national asset” was handed over to the private sector.

He said that agriculture, industry and trade and businesses would be doomed if IMF conditionalities were accepted, adding that the government needed to play its role for uplifting the economy on the pattern of various European countries and the US.

Mr Ahmed asked “patriotic politicians and bureaucrats” to “bring back $23 billion from abroad” to help in the recovery of the national economy, restoring the confidence of Pakistani expatriates who would be encouraged to invest up to $200 billion.

Shahid Bugti of the Jamhoori Watan Party said he feared that the government “may continue to privatise national assets like the previous government”, citing the sale of Habib Bank for a paltry Rs22 billion, paid by the new owners in instalments out of profits earned from the same organisation. Tahir Mashhadi of the MQM urged the government to eliminate corruption and smuggling as the menace was eating up 60 per cent of the national wealth every year.

He said if the federal government found it difficult to run the Qadirpur gas field, it should hand it over to Sindh, its “rightful owner”. He also called for giving provinces “complete autonomy to build a better Pakistan”.

Abdur Rahim Mandokhel of the Pakhtoonkhwah Milli Awami Party termed the IMF an agent of international imperialists, and said he supported the suggestion for setting up a bipartisan committee to discuss options for economic recovery.

The house, which was presided over in parts by acting Chairman Jan Mohammad Jamali and PPP’s Dr. Safdar Abbasi, was adjourned till 2:30pm on Thursday when it was expected to be prorogued after winding up of the debate.
 
Central bank under fire in Senate



Thursday, November 13, 2008

By Mumtaz Alvi

ISLAMABAD: The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) came under scathing attack on Wednesday from the treasury and opposition lawmakers for allegedly undermining parliament.

The legislators feared that the latest SBP move to hike the interest rate was a part of harsh IMF conditions prior to granting loan. The legislators described the steps taken by the SBP so far too little and too late in view of the faltering economic indicators.

Leader of the House in the Senate Mian Raza Rabbani billed the central bank’s decision to increase the interest rate as wrong, insisting it should have waited till the conclusion of the ongoing debate on the economic situation.

The enraged senators blamed Pervez Musharraf and former prime minister Shaukat Aziz for the present economic morass and called for their accountability, along with their economic advisers.

Treasury and opposition lawmakers, while opposing the proposed sell-off of the Qadirpur gas field and Dadu Sugar Mills, said the sale of such strategic assets would ruin the country’s economy.

It was proposed that a parliamentary committee be formed to suggest how to steer the country out of the present economic crisis instead of approaching the IMF. On the third day of the debate, the lawmakers fiercely opposed the government’s alleged hasty decision of going to the IMF and asked politicians, bureaucrats, generals and expatriates to bring their money from abroad. They claimed that a small chunk of it could help Pakistan overcome the economic crisis.

Some of the speakers charged the SBP was functioning like a state within a state and that too on foreign diktat. “It appears by listening to senators that what the IMF is giving for cure is not a bitter pill but poison,” remarked Jan Jamali.

The government was cautioned against increasing the gas tariff as recommended by the OGRA and one senator said such cruel actions could lead one day to a civil war in Pakistan. An ANP senator complained that though his party was part of the ruling coalition yet it was not taken into confidence on this particular development, which would not serve any purpose in the wake of falling prices of POL and other commodities.

Lawmakers across the aisle also strongly differed with the SBP governor’s claim that inflation was still 25 per cent and said it would not be more than 20 per cent, adding that there was no justification for this uncalled for increase.

An opposition senator, while opposing the sell-off of national assets, proposed the elimination of the Ministry of Privatisation, basing his argument on the proposed privatisation of massive revenue-generating Qadirpur gas field and the state entities sold out in the past.

As the House reconvened 40 minutes behind schedule, chaired by Jan Muhammad Jamali, former finance minister Ishaq Dar on a point of order protested over the increase in the interest and discount rate, saying this was done at a time when the Senate was debating the national economy and businessmen were opposed to hike in the interest rate.

“Today, the monetary policy has been changed. Who is doing this? There should have been consensus on this delicate matter. This step runs contrary to the country’s economic position,” he maintained.

Prof Khurshid Ahmad described the move as an attack on parliament’s role and believed it was part of the IMF diktat. He said the increase would neither serve the agriculture and manufacturing sectors nor attract foreign investment. The senator saw it an anti-growth measure.

Leader of the Opposition Kamil Ali Agha alleged that the IMF conditionalities were being met, as without it, the donor agency would not give loan. “The entire world is decreasing the interest rate, whereas in Pakistan, it is being hiked,” he noted. The SBP’s measure, he believed, was like sabotaging the House. He said already two days before the start of a requisitioned session, and with a mala fide intention, the privatisation plan of Qadirpur gas field was okayed.

ANP’s Ilyas Bilour contended that industry would not survive as already several industries, such as steel and cotton, were in crisis and had registered negative growth. A member of the PML-Q like-minded group Zafar Iqbal said that such measures could further impede competitiveness of the Pakistani products in the world market.

“Those who promised to provide Roti, Kapra Aur Makaan are destroying industry and agriculture. The Senate should have been given importance, this House is not a union council,” said Pari Gul Agha of the PML-Q.

She also castigated the president and prime minister for going abroad instead of visiting the earthquake victims, who were facing hardships under the open sky. Taking part in the debate, Prof Khurshid said going to the IMF would compel the government to further tighten the monetary policy, whereas such policy was detrimental to the production sector.

“The IMF formulas have failed almost in all the developing countries and the repeat of such experience in Pakistan will wreak havoc. Rupee has been massively devalued and the IMF will seek its further erosion,” he feared.

The step of selling out profit-making entities, he warned, was a wrong one and it was like killing a hen that daily laid a golden egg. He particularly flayed the sale of the OGDCL shares, which were giving Rs 99 billion profit annually.

He said the Qadirpur gas field had a 40 per cent share in the provision of gas and was giving profit of over dollars 180 million annually and there was a possibility of increase in it in the future.

The senator also opposed the proposed sale of the SME Bank, saying that it was playing an important role in the promotion of small and medium business. He said the previous government had a major role in the present state of economic affairs, but the present regime had also failed to chalk out a strategy to handle the situation.

Prof Khurshid claimed that only 45 Pakistanis had $23 billion abroad in addition to dollar 150-200 billion held by expatriates. “These people can help Pakistan at this juncture by sending a small portion of their assets to the country,” he said.

Rabbani said that gradually the embezzlement by Musharraf and Aziz was coming to light and their economic crimes were being unearthed. He alleged that even the Ministry of Finance and the SBP were kept in the dark, when Shaukat Aziz as the prime minister had allowed more than $4 billion capital flight and had issued a series of SROs to benefit his favourites.

“Today, the national kitty is empty and the government is left with no option but to approach the IMF, a course the PPP has always been opposing,” he said. He admitted that the SBP had done a wrong thing by increasing the interest rate, instead of waiting for the conclusion of a House debate on the economic situation.

JWP’s Shahid Hasan Bugti also opposed the sell-off of the national assets and called for a check on the government spending. In this context, he made the mention of the HBL, which was sold out for peanuts and the buyer had paid first instalment of Rs 22 billion from its own pocket and then paid the remaining from the bank profit.

Tahir Hussain Mashhadi, Abdur Rahim Mandokhail, Liaquat Bangalzai and Khalid Soomro also opposed the privatisation of the Qadirpur gas field and the Dadu Sugar Mills and questioned why consumers were deprived of relief in the wake of plunge in the prices of POL, edible oil and other commodities.
 
Capital suggestion:

A forex reserve scandal?

Sunday, November 16, 2008
by Dr Farrukh Saleem


The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) classifies foreign exchange reserves into two categories: net reserves with the SBP and net reserves with banks. For the record, over the past 10 months or so, net reserves with the SBP have gone down by some $10 billion while net reserves with banks have gone up by around a billion dollars.

Last week, Pakistan's leading moneychangers were arrested on charges of illegally remitting abroad $10 billion from the country and depleting Pakistan's foreign exchange reserves. The assumption here is that there was $10 billion worth of net reserves with banks that the moneychangers have routed out of Pakistan. The SBP records clearly show that over the past 10 months private Pakistani citizens have not taken dollars out of their accounts from Pakistani banks for the purpose of remitting $10 billion dollars out of Pakistan (http://www.sbp.org.pk/ecodata/forex.pdf). As a matter of fact, net reserves with banks never went as high as $10 billion so there is no question of moneychangers depleting reserves with banks and remitting $10 billion out of Pakistan. Yes, the SBP reserves have gone down by $10 billion but the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) is surely not accusing the SBP of sending dollars abroad through the arrested moneychangers. In that sense, there is no foreign exchange reserve scam. Next, the hawala story. To be certain, hawala is a term that was first mentioned when the Islamic fiqh was being written back in the 8th century. So, hawala has been going on at least for the past 1,300 years. In a more modern sense, hawala is simply the transfer of value from one city to another through the use of an informal, non-banking channel. Hawala essentially has two legs -- one in Pakistan and the other outside of Pakistan (presumably, the second leg or the suppliers of dollars are Pakistani expatriate workers). And, the whole hawala affair depends on two things: trust and performance. One thing that hawala does not have is a paper trail.

Three questions: one, why do people use hawala? Two, are Pakistani moneychangers involved in hawala? Three, would the Federal Investigation Agency (Crime Circle Wing) be able to prove wrongdoing on part of moneychangers in a court of law?

Logically, people would use hawala only in those instances when hawala operators provide a superior service as compared to regular banking channels. Either the pick-up or delivery is more efficient or the rate of exchange is better. Naturally, if Pakistani banks want to snatch business away from hawala operators they would have to compete in delivery as well as the rate of exchange. As long as hawala is more efficient the hawala network is providing an essential service that the market wants and thus no government on the face of the planet would be able to shut hawala down.

There is little doubt that our moneychangers do undertake hawala transactions. And, there is little doubt that the Federal Investigation Agency will fail to prove charges against moneychangers in a court of law.

Next, have moneychangers caused Pakistan any extraordinary damage over the past few months? To come up with an answer to that, I compared a whole host of figures on home remittances as compiled by the SBP (http://www.sbp.org.pk/ecodata/homeremmit/remittance.pdf). The SBP figures clearly show that there has been an upward trend in home remittances through banking channels and that upward trend has sustained itself over the recent past. In other words, Pakistani expatriate workers who have in the past used banking channels to remit their earnings have continued to do so over the past few months as well. There is no evidence whatsoever that an extraordinarily large amount of home remittances has been diverted away from banking channels.

Is there any evidence that our rupee has lost value because of moneychangers? I have no doubt in my mind that transactions undertaken by moneychangers have an affect on rupee-dollar parity (albeit a minor one). I am also sure that the principal determinant of rupee-dollar parity is our billion-dollar-a-month current account deficit and not moneychangers.

Here is what I do not understand: what would our government get out of this whole drama. Don't we already have enough uncertainty? Isn't the Karachi Stock Exchange already shut down? Isn't the economy already going through a severe heart attack? Has $10 billion really been sent abroad? Doesn't anyone in the government know that the total stock of rupees in circulation is Rs980 billion or the equivalent of $11 billion? Isn't there a soul in the government who first analyses pros and cons of governmental actions before actually ordering action? Has the government also been indoctrinated by the indoctrinators of suicide bombers?
 
This is what happens when you have no regulatoary powers when it comes to vast exchanges on money in the country!
 
Dear webby the $ 10billion scame now reached upto $38billion rather, figure as quoted by accused himself... ... to make easy now to decied to be sad or or not.....but even still :undecided:
So here i would to highlight an important point to be noticed that, govt figured out $ 10 billion, while accused accepted crimes of their engagement in transfer $38 billion reather. It's enough to show the non-serious linient attitude and incompetencies by criminal negligence of govt institutions including State Bank & Ministry of Finance that how they neglected such a big difference of $28billion in our balance sheets:eek:
Such incompetencies offers 'thugs' to play with country's treasures and ruin the public funds as & when they desire.:agree:
My friend, it is Rupee 38bn not dollars. It is less than half a billion dollars.

38,000,000,000.00 PKR = 476,907,628.69 USD

11 people involved in transfer of dollars worth Rs38 bn: Khanani, Kalia

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

LAHORE: Javed Khanani and Munaf Kalia, accused of involvement in a major financial scam of the country, have during interrogation revealed that only in the last one month 11 people transferred Rs38 billion worth of dollars to foreign countries.

Out of these 11 persons, 9 belong to Karachi while 2 are from Lahore.

According to FIA sources, illegal business of transferring dollars, pounds and other foreign currencies has been going on in the country since 2006. The main centre of this business is Dubai where inflow and outflow of millions of dollars takes place on daily basis.

During interrogation the accused also disclosed that millions of dollars were also transferred abroad following declaration of emergency situation in the country by former president Pervez Musharraf last year, sources said.

The names of these eleven persons identified by the accused are being kept clandestine and they will be disclosed at an appropriate time later.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom