Ayush
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2012
- Messages
- 7,805
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Banning is the easier way out, not the wiser way.
respect sir.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Banning is the easier way out, not the wiser way.
Actually it was written for the Hindu . they must have given the express tribune permission to reprint it .Writing an article against a Democratically Elected leader in a Foreign Country's (which has no friendlier relation with India & just needs excuses to bash India, eg. SRK incident) Newspaper is very NEUTRAL/SANE decision by the chairman of press trust of INDIA.
I second that.
So which one you believe ?He's titled to his opinions, like this one:
90% of Indians are 'idiots', Markandey Katju says - Times Of India
Nothing Katju is just showing his loyalty to the ones(Congress) who provided him with a post retirement job
The Future With Modi
--------------------
¶6. (SBU) In response to PolCouns' query, Naidu announced
that Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi would play a
prominent role in the next BJP-led government in Delhi.
"He is coming to the center. No one can prevent that," he
said firmly. He followed this by reiterating the common
BJP (and Indian) objection to the revocation of Modi's U.S.
visa. He claimed that most Indians feel that the U.S.
position in this matter is unjustified. Naidu underscored
that his protest was on principle alone as Modi has no
intention of applying for a U.S. visa. He added that video
conferencing today allows Modi to visit his Indian American
constituency without a visa.
So which one you believe ?
I don't believe either.
Today is the 11th anniversary of the horrific Godhra pogrom in which 59 Hindu pilgrims, mostly women and children were burnt alive by a crazed mob in a pre-meditated act of barbarianism.
Praying for their souls.
their martyrdom would not go to waste and will always be remembered sooner or later Ram Temple would surely be built at Ayodhya
Jai Shri Ram!!!
...Then dont ask Ram Temple to be built there....
If there ever was a Ram temple that was demolished to build a Mosqe by the Mugal idiots, dont you think that we Hindus in modern times are repeating the same mistake. Man what is going to make a difference, lets say that you guys have built a temple there, then what is RAM going to come back alive and rule you for another milania and make us the HYPER POWER of the world? NO, then why this stupidity.Whats the problem with Ram mandir in Ayodhya ?
If there ever was a Ram temple that was demolished to build a Mosqe by the Mugal idiots, dont you think that we Hindus in modern times are repeating the same mistake. Man what is going to make a difference, lets say that you guys have built a temple there, then what is RAM going to come back alive and rule you for another milania and make us the HYPER POWER of the world? NO, then why this stupidity.
Have you ever seen God? because my entire life God has neither appeared before me, nor talked to me. I care less for these Temple stuff because if God exist, he certainly does not need a home for him in one location as he is every where and is not bound by time.Its simply a building of Ram Mandir on the place Hindus believe is the Ram Janmasthan and hence one of our most sacred spots..why make a big deal out of it ?