Military vows befitting response against Indian aggression

[Gunsnroses]

So pigeon was the "befitting" reply?

Did I say that?
So tell us please do you have the ability to tackle our pigeons?

 

[Sneaker]

Did I say that?
So tell us please do you have the ability to tackle our pigeons?

This is about "befitting" reply. Seems like pigeons are the only "befitting" reply you can give... pigeons with olive branches...

 

[Gunsnroses]

This is about "befitting" reply. Seems like pigeons are the only "befitting" reply you can give... pigeons with olive branches...

If you can't handle a pigeon how would you handle a befitting reply dumbo .
Now carry on whining please

 

[Sneaker]

If you can't handle a pigeon how would you handle a befitting reply dumbo .
Now carry on whining please

First give the "befitting" reply instead of sending pigeons with olive branches, then we can see whether India can handle it or not.. instead of that all we are getting is verbal di... well..

 

[Desert Fox]

yawn! and we are waiting for the devastating day you can avenge 1971.

Actually, you see, 1971 was a big favor india did for us. Now we no longer have to strain our resources by diverting them to feed & defend 156 million people in what is today Bangladesh. Now we can focus all of our resources on a single front. Thanks for making our job easier.

This is about "befitting" reply. Seems like pigeons are the only "befitting" reply you can give... pigeons with olive branches...

Because that is all we need to scare the living crap out of you bharatis. Our animals are enough to cause a scare and media hype in your country.

 

[That Guy]

Heh, how? Atleast India carried out those and some without warning many many times. But Befitting reply was missing...

How what?

India hasn't carried out anything in Pakistan.

Pakistan was not fighting a civil war out of thin air.

It was us that armed and trained and supported those people for the civil war and when they seemed about to lose, we entered directly.

The point is that there are ways around restrictions provided the political leadership is willing to take action. The current political leadership of India is willing to take action and retaliate against Pakistan in multiple ways.

So you admit that India supported terrorism, and instigated civil war in another country? Keep in mind, I'm going to hold these words in the future.

By the way, this isn't retaliation, this is aggression.

 

[Sneaker]

How what?

India hasn't carried out anything in Pakistan.

India did it in 1947, 1965, 1971, 1983 and 1999 (Munto Dhalo), leaving numerous cross border raids most of which haven't even been publicized.
Edit: How would you be billionaire if India attacked you?

 

[That Guy]

Pakistan has been in this turmoil after peaceful 15 years of its birth.
Situation is still same. Pakistan is still fighting a war with itself. So nothing has changed actually.

India can always raise the stakes whenever it suits to India. But India chooses not to, not because she's afraid but because India has learned that it is not worth the Time and resources.

So ask your military to tone down And stop sending 2 bit filthy jihadi in India.

That might suit you

What a dumb statement.

First of all, Pakistan hasn't been fighting itself for a long time. Second, India has always raised the stakes, not Pakistan. Remember, it was India's decision to introduce nuclear weapons to south Asia, not Pakistan's.

Pakistan isn't the one issuing out threats, and saying that they'll use terrorists as assets to destabilize neighboring nations, it is India.

 

[tsinga]

So you admit that India supported terrorism, and instigated civil war in another country? Keep in mind, I'm going to hold these words in the future.

By the way, this isn't retaliation, this is aggression.

Here sir:

It is called retaliation because in 1965 (6 years prior to 1971), Pakistan did the exact same thing.

Operation Gibraltar was the codename given to the strategy of Pakistan to infiltrate Jammu and Kashmir, a state in India, and start a rebellion against Indian rule. If successful, Pakistan hoped to gain control over Kashmir.


In August 1965, Pakistan Army's 50th Airborne paratroopers and Pakistan Army's guerrillas, disguised as locals, entered Jammu and Kashmir from Pakistan with the goal of fomenting an insurgency among Kashmiri Muslims.[citation needed] However, the strategy went awry from the outset due to poor coordination, and the infiltrators were soon discovered.
Operation Gibraltar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We just took what Pakistan tried to do unsuccessfully and did it successfully.

 

[ACE OF THE AIR]

So you admit that India supported terrorism, and instigated civil war in another country? Keep in mind, I'm going to hold these words in the future.

By the way, this isn't retaliation, this is aggression.

After the latest MODI speech do you still have doubts...

 

[That Guy]

India did it in 1947, 1965, 1971, 1983 and 1999 (Munto Dhalo), leaving numerous cross border raids most of which haven't even been publicized.

First of all, those were war, Pakistan has conducted many aerial raids in India during them, as well; it's stupid to bring them up. Second, 1947 is when Pakistan successfully broke away from India, permanently splitting the subcontinent into many pieces.

Next, things have changed. A war now guarantees mutually assured destruction. There is a reason why India has backed off, every time there have been standoffs.

 

[pakdefender]

If someone gave me a cent each time pakistan "warned" befitting reply to india, i would be a millionair by now.

I would be trillionare if someone gave me a cent every time india bluffed and bragged about crossing the LoC

 

[That Guy]

Here sir:

It is called retaliation because in 1965 (6 years prior to 1971), Pakistan did the exact same thing.

Operation Gibraltar was the codename given to the strategy of Pakistan to infiltrate Jammu and Kashmir, a state in India, and start a rebellion against Indian rule. If successful, Pakistan hoped to gain control over Kashmir.


In August 1965, Pakistan Army's 50th Airborne paratroopers and Pakistan Army's guerrillas, disguised as locals, entered Jammu and Kashmir from Pakistan with the goal of fomenting an insurgency among Kashmiri Muslims.[citation needed] However, the strategy went awry from the outset due to poor coordination, and the infiltrators were soon discovered.
Operation Gibraltar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We just took what Pakistan tried to do unsuccessfully and did it successfully.

So, your military waited 50 years to retaliate? Dude, shut up. stop comparing old events with new ones. This isn't retaliation, today's events are aggressio from India. It's so like you to try your statement to suit your argument.

Pakistan has not shown any aggression towards India in today's age, while India has shown that it's intent is to attack Pakistan every chance it gets. Pakistan is busy stablizing it's western border, it has no time nor intention to start anything with India.

 

[tsinga]

So, your military waited 50 years to retaliate? Dude, shut up. stop comparing old events with new ones. This isn't retaliation, today's events are aggressio from India. It's so like you to try your statement to suit your argument.

Pakistan has not shown any aggression towards India in today's age, while India has shown that it's intent is to attack Pakistan every chance it gets. Pakistan is busy stablizing it's western border, it has no time nor intention to start anything with India.

Waited 50 years?
We are discussing 1971 here...and you asked me or rather told me that India creating an uprising in East Pakistan(then) was aggression and not retaliation.

I just pointed it out that India took the leaf from Pakistan's book based on what Pakistan tried on India in 1965.

What it did comes strictly under retaliation.

 

[Sneaker]

Actually, you see, 1971 was a big favor india did for us. Now we no longer have to strain our resources by diverting them to feed & defend 156 million people in what is today Bangladesh. Now we can focus all of our resources on a single front. Thanks for making our job easier.

Because that is all we need to scare the living crap out of you bharatis. Our animals are enough to cause a scare and media hype in your country.

What a distorted view.. It was bengalis who were feeding you... It was Bengali resources being diverted to the then west pakistan, not other way around. I don't git everything concentrated at one front hyperbole you are on... at one hand, you cry there wasn't enough troops in EP (ergo everything concentrated in west) hence it was defeated and now this? In 1971, india had to divide its forces in 3 fronts while all pakistan forces were concentrated in west.. now india has to divide forces in 2 fronts.. how does it help you again?

Keep sending them pigeons with olive branch (symbol of surrender and request for peace)..