Military technology in Asia and the rest of the world judged

[tanlixiang28776]

First of all i would like the introduce myself. I have been a long time member of this forum and have stopped really posting for a long time.

What this thread is discussing will be how personal bias blinds many in arguments in threads about military technology. I am personally living the United states which currently has the best both in quality and quantity when it comes to everything military. I am also from China which means i have great interest in its military development as well. I also follow other countries development.

Now to my main point. The countries I will be discussing will be placed into a couple groups for easier classification and relevancy. These countries will be under discussion as they are pertinent to this particular forum.

I want to see how ones bias ones affects the listings

USA
Pakistan
Vietnam
China
India
Japan
Russia
Strong European country eg France,Britain which I will refer to simply EU

Below is my personal arrangements of countries by quality and quantity of military technology in the current date of 12/17/2015

Airforce:

1.USA
2.Russia
3.China
4.India
5.EU
6.Japan
7.Pakistan
8.Vietnam

Navy:

1.USA
2.Russia
3.Japan
4.China
5.EU
6.India
7.Pakistan
8.Vietnam

Army:

1.USA
2.China
3.Russia
4.India
5.Pakistan
6.EU
7.Japan
8.Vietnam

Strategic forces:

1.USA
2.Russia
3.China
4.EU
5.India
6.Pakistan

Japan and Vietnam are not included since they lack nuclear strategic forces.

Now pls give any comments on my listing and make your own list. Can be simply be overall instead of categorically.

 

[calmDown@all]

Army:

1.USA
2.China
3.Russia
4.India
5.Pakistan
6.EU
7.Japan
8.Vietnam

sir plz do me a favour & kindly explain about the bases of your categorizing of countries in context to "army"

 

[tanlixiang28776]

sir plz do me a favour & kindly explain about the bases of your categorizing of countries in context to "army"

Catch all including infantry, Anti air units, mechanized units, aerial transports, aerial combat such as attack helicopters, artillery

 

[drunken-monke]

Why Israel would miss the spot in the air-force list?

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Why Israel would miss the spot in the air-force list?

Maybe read the post first?

Does anyone disagree with my lists?

 

[calmDown@all]

quality and quantity of military technology in the current date

sir its good to see your arrangements but still there is a little problem since every nation has its own requirements this implies they would actully have their own specific developments implying to their own standards or substandard of weapon which means less scope for quality & a country with less war history with its neighbour would imply less quantity of military assets

 

[tanlixiang28776]

sir its good to see your arrangements but still there is a little problem since every nation has its own requirements this implies they would actully have their own specific developments implying to their own standards or substandard of weapon which means less scope for quality & a country with less war history with its neighbour would imply less quantity of military assets

Im talking of quality and quality vis a vis these other countries specifically. They will be held to the same standards or lack of thereof.

 

[Beidou2020]

Wow @tanlixiang28776 you have returned.

Good to see you back.

 

[calmDown@all]

Im talking of quality and quality vis a vis these other countries specifically. They will be held to the same standards or lack of thereof.

plz can u elaborate it a little

 

[tanlixiang28776]

plz can u elaborate it a little

quality and quantity are intrinsically meaningless without comparison and stating you have your own standards makes 0 senses as this thread is a comparison between the standards of the countries involved. So one country will have a higher or lower standard.

That is what this thread is about.

Wow @tanlixiang28776 you have returned.

Good to see you back.

Meh got tired of all the crap threads

I am not stating that i am absolutely right. This is simply my opinion based on my own research and base knowledge.

Please argue for or against what i have stated

 

[calmDown@all]

quality and quantity are intrinsically meaningless without comparison and stating you have your own standards makes 0 senses as this thread is a comparison between the standards of the countries involved. So one country will have a higher or lower standard.

That is what this thread is about.

see this is my point if a country has its own standards for a specified system this would mean that we are comparing apple & oranges since they are for their stuff & they are for their making it meaning less if compared with each other on a real battle ground since they are not meant for same purpose hope so
but still thanks
for this thread

 

[Beidou2020]

Meh got tired of all the crap threads

I understand what you mean.

Good to see a few posts from you.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

see this is my point if a country has its own standards for a specified system this would mean that we are comparing apple & oranges since they are for their stuff & they are for their making it meaning less if compared with each other on a real battle ground since they are not meant for same purpose hope so
but still thanks
for this thread

All standards are compared to the leading military leader which is the United States which is undisputed.

 

[SSGcommandoPAK]

Maybe read the post first?

Does anyone disagree with my lists?

Nop sir !!!

 

[Taygibay]

Does anyone disagree with my lists?

Yes.

Good day all, Tay.

P.S. The above answer is laconic and sarcastic, my bad, but putting Russia as second in NavalPower
with a Navy barely at blue water level when they lack aircraft carriers ruined any possible discussion.