Militants Slip Away Before Pakistan Offensive

[MKI 30]

Uncle Ji Sam will get you one way or the other. hahaha

Not going to happen. We know our limitations. One thing India is good at is saying No and keeping its interest first before anything else.

 

[illusion8]

The Do more was to make Pakistan start an operation in N Waziristan-
After that area is cleared dont know what the next do more will imply where?--

Lack of action against the Haqqanis threatens hundreds of millions of dollars in future U.S. aid to Pakistan, which is dependent on moving against the group, designated as terrorists by Washington, U.S. officials said.

Going after the haqqani.

 

[JonAsad]

Lack of action against the Haqqanis threatens hundreds of millions of dollars in future U.S. aid to Pakistan, which is dependent on moving against the group, designated as terrorists by Washington, U.S. officials said.
Going after the haqqani.

Exactly where?-
Its an assumption that they are spared-
While Pakistan has clearly stated there is no discrimination of good or bad talibans in the on going operation- I dont have anything to doubt that resolve- over an article no way-

Does the OP provide any proofs apart from mere assumptions?-

 

[FaujHistorian]

I am just comparing both the threads - the thread about seeking money for operations and this article that implies that it would be difficult to continue aid because PA isn't targeting the militants that the US wants targeted.

This article seems to be a counter to Pakistan's request for money to aid the operation - that is if I am reading too much into it.

(I am not in the same class as you in asking loaded questions yet - so maaf kar dena).

My main question btw was - isn't it a repeat of the "do more"?

The problem with many educated Indians is that they become illogical when it comes to Pakistan.

If you didn't have a "extreme" bias against Pakistan and Pakistani army, you would have come up with a plausible answer yourself.


You probably know that Afghanistan's lifeline is dependent on Pakistan in every which way, militarily, economically, industrially, and agriculturally.

We never asked the world to help us with economic, industrial, and agricultural support of Afghanistan.

The only exception is military.


If Indian planners were not "extremely biased" against Pakistan, they would have established a joint military plan with Pakistan.


Sadly though, many Indian posters on this forum (including yourself) and majority Indian intellectuals in Dilli have said by to logic on this issue.

and hence your question.


Hope you don't mind me being to straightforward on this.

thank you for being a good listener.


Peace

 

[JonAsad]

Not going to happen. We know our limitations. One thing India is good at is saying No and keeping its interest first before anything else.

Don't underestimate the cunning Amrikans- one way or another they always get what they want-

 

[FaujHistorian]

Lack of action against the Haqqanis threatens hundreds of millions of dollars in future U.S. aid to Pakistan, which is dependent on moving against the group, designated as terrorists by Washington, U.S. officials said.

Going after the haqqani.

Do you even know the numbers about Haqqani foot soldiers and military equipment?


Just curious!

Not going to happen. We know our limitations. One thing India is good at is saying No and keeping its interest first before anything else.

Do you even understand what I wrote bro?

Please go back and re-read and try to understand.

 

[illusion8]

The problem with many educated Indians is that they become illogical when it comes to Pakistan.

If you didn't have a "extreme" bias against Pakistan and Pakistani army, you would have come up with a plausible answer yourself.


You probably know that Afghanistan's lifeline is dependent on Pakistan in every which way, militarily, economically, industrially, and agriculturally.

We never asked the world to help us with economic, industrial, and agricultural support of Afghanistan.

The only exception is military.


If Indian planners were not "extremely biased" against Pakistan, they would have established a joint military plan with Pakistan.


Sadly though, many Indian posters on this forum (including yourself) and majority Indian intellectuals in Dilli have said by to logic on this issue.

and hence your question.


Hope you don't mind me being to straightforward on this.

thank you for being a good listener.


Peace

That wasn't an answer to my question, I might have picked a wrong guy (you) to ask a very simple and straight forward question.

Peace to you too.

 

[FaujHistorian]

Don't underestimate the cunning Amrikans- one way or another they always get what they want-

Nothing to do with "cunningness" of Americans.

they are the super power and every one from India to China to Japan to Germany to Pakistan to UK to Mexico works for them. Just the type of service provided changes from country to country.

Just read the export/import numbers for the last 40 years.

No conspiracy theories please.

 

[illusion8]

Do you even know the numbers about Haqqani foot soldiers and military equipment?


Just curious!

Bro,

I am not even questioning whether Pakistan is killing or not killing any haqqani - my point was the American policy of "do more". Anyways I think the basic logic is lost on you.

 

[FaujHistorian]

Bro,

I am not even questioning whether Pakistan is killing or not killing any haqqani - my point was the American policy of "do more". Anyways I think the basic logic is lost on you.

"do more" is an abusive term used by Islamist and leftists in Pakistan.

You know that. Right?

With USA it has been a joint / shared effort to bring stability in Afghanistan.

 

[illusion8]

Exactly where?-
Its an assumption that they are spared-
While Pakistan has clearly stated there is no discrimination of good or bad talibans in the on going operation- I dont have anything to doubt that resolve- over an article no way-

Does the OP provide any proofs apart from mere assumptions?-

Yeah, I think the OP alluded to some proof - you could read the OP.

 

[FaujHistorian]

Yeah, I think the OP alluded to some proof - you could read the OP.

OP never did any homework.

They just heard few Wazirastani residents.

At this moment, such people are the least trustworthy.

 

[illusion8]

OP never did any homework.

They just heard few Wazirastani residents.

At this moment, such people are the least trustworthy.

Who would be the most trustworthy for them to gauge your operation then? the ISPR?

 

[FaujHistorian]

Who would be the most trustworthy for them to gauge your operation then? the ISPR?

again you are being jokerish.

ISPR is just one of the sources for "ordinary people and news papers"

Americans have joint operational centers with Pak army.
then they have drones flying above.

It is obvious that you tend to ignore that, or you have no idea what's going on the ground. And in your desperation, you latch on to any news that puts Pakistan army down.

Sadly.

 

[MKI 30]

Do you even understand what I wrote bro?
Please go back and re-read and try to understand

Sorry did i get you wrong?

What is the context exactly? But nonetheless I know balancing between what American wants and what we want is going to be tough.

Thanks.