What's new

Militant Group in Egypt Vows Loyalty to ISIS

islamrules

BANNED
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
573
Reaction score
-3
CAIRO — They have slaughtered hundreds of Egyptian soldiers and police officers, recruited experienced fighters and staged increasingly sophisticated raids from the Western desert to the Sinai Peninsula. They have beheaded informants and killed an American in a carjacking, say Western officials familiar with intelligence reports.

On Monday, Egypt’s most dangerous militant group, Ansar Beit al-Maqdis, also pledged obedience to the organization that calls itself the Islamic State, becoming its first significant international affiliate in the bet that the link will provide new money, weapons and recruits to battle the government in Cairo.

The affiliation could pull the militant group away from its current, almost exclusive focus on attacking Egyptian military and security forces toward the Islamic State’s indiscriminate mass killings of civilians. The pledge alone could undermine the government’s efforts to win the trust of Western tourists, a vital source of hard currency.The decision injects the Islamic State into the most populous and historically most influential Arab nation, a milestone weeks into an American-led bombing campaign against its strongholds in Syria and Iraq. The endorsement is a major victory for the Islamic State in its rivalry with Al Qaeda — a group with deep Egyptian roots — and could now help recruit fighters and affiliates far beyond Egypt.
The link is also the latest manifestation of a swirling descent into violence around the region amid the dashed hopes for democracy of the Arab Spring uprisings three years ago.

But in practical terms, the Islamic State could also share resources — from its wealth of stolen money and oil, seized-weapons stores or jihadi-world prestige — to add new fuel to the Egyptian group’s insurgency at a critical turning point.

In recent weeks, Ansar Beit al-Maqdis has come under a withering crackdown by the Egyptian military, which has begun the evacuation and destruction of hundreds of homes in an attempt to eradicate the group from its havens in northern Sinai. But at the same time the group has confounded the confident predictions of Egyptian officials that it would soon be defeated, raising fears that the fight may just be beginning.

“The organized army is in confrontation with a group of disorganized ghosts,” said Ahmed Sakr, a government official working on economic development in Sinai, who said that the military’s “brute force” there was alienating the population while scattering fighters across the country. “I am very worried that there is now going to be more instability in the west, and Ansar Beit al-Maqdis will make inroads into Cairo and the big cities.”


Having killed hundreds of soldiers and police officers in a rampage of violent retaliation for the military ouster of the Islamist president last year, Ansar Beit al-Maqdis has more recently carried out a handful of increasingly sophisticated and deadly attacks on military camps at both the eastern and western extremes of the country, according to Western officials and Egyptian analysts familiar with intelligence reports on militant activity in the region.

An attack in the Western desert on July 19 killed at least 21 soldiers, and another on Oct. 24 in Sinai killed at least 31, the officials say, and both demonstrated that Ansar Beit al-Maqdis has now recruited more skilled and experienced fighters.

Most alarmingly for the Egyptian military, Egyptian leaders believe the group has developed military informants with inside information about army deployments, according to several Western and Egyptian officials.

In the Oct. 24 attack, for example, the militants appeared to know about the confidential movements of senior officers and reinforcement routes, the officials say. The fighters also displayed skill at targeting mortar fire as well as the confidence to continue their operation even under gunfire during a prolonged firefight, they say.

“This is not just planting a bomb and running,” said Diaa Rashwan, a researcher on Islamist groups at the Al Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies here. “To be able to keep attacking, that means you have real experience.”

Ansar Beit al-Maqdis fighters were also behind the killing of an American during a desert carjacking in August and may have been linked to other attacks targeting desert-ready, four-wheel drive S.U.V.s, according to Western officials — a development that has prompted the Egyptian government to order international energy companies to restrict their fleets of sport utility vehicles. Apache, British Petroleum and British Gas have all complied with the measure; spokesmen for all three companies and the Egyptian government declined to comment.

Some Western officials question the evidence linking the group to other carjackings besides the killing in August of the American, an Apache employee named William Henderson, 58. But there is a consensus that the group has confounded attempts by Egyptian security officials to contain it by tightly controlling the limited transit points across the Suez Canal into the Sinai Peninsula.

Western officials say Ansar Beit al-Maqdis includes cells of fighters scattered on both sides of the Nile. And they have capitalized on porous borders to obtain refuge and supplies from sympathetic militants to both the east and west of the country — in lawless eastern Libya on one side, and in the Palestinian territory of Gaza bordering Sinai on the other.

In Sinai, the suspicion that critical aid has flowed through the network of smuggling tunnels into Gaza is one reason that the Egyptian government took the drastic step of evacuating and destroying the homes of more than 1,100 families, all in a zone near the border.

In an audio statement on Monday pledging to “obey” Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the Islamic State’s leader and self-proclaimed caliph, Ansar Beit al-Maqdis also repeated a call to rise up against Egypt’s military-backed government — a trademark of its previous statements.


“To our people in Egypt, what are you waiting for after the violation of your dignity?” the statement asked. “After shedding the blood of your sons on the hands of this reckless tyrant and his soldiers? When will you take out your swords to face your enemies?”

It also added a familiar slap at the Muslim Brotherhood, the mainstream Islamist group that dominated Egypt’s free elections and backed the deposed president, Mohamed Morsi, only to end up crushed by the military takeover. “Shameful peace will do you no good, nor will blasphemous democracy,” the statement said, “and you have seen how it has claimed its upholders and their masters.”

Details about Ansar Beit al-Maqdis are scarce, in part because the Egyptian military limits access to the areas of Sinai that are the front line of its battle against the group. Its name means Supporters of Jerusalem, and Western officials estimate that it includes only hundreds or perhaps a few thousand fighters.

Western officials familiar with intelligence reports on the group’s internal communications say that a faction of Ansar Beit al-Maqdis based in the Nile Valley opposed the affiliation with the Islamic State. They worried that its reputation for careless violence will alienate other Egyptians, especially the disaffected Islamist youth that Ansar Beit al-Maqdis has sought to enlist.

Some Nile Valley leaders of Ansar Beit al-Maqdis also appear to remember the lessons of an earlier Islamist insurgency, centered in Upper Egypt in the 1990s. Mass killings of tourists and others backfired, damaging the economy, alienating the Egyptian public and increasing support for the government’s security forces.

Ansar Beit al-Maqdis’s previous statements have also looked to Al Qaeda for leadership, and some of the Nile Valley faction remain loyal to Al Qaeda as it has become a rival to the Islamic State for pre-eminence in the jihadi world.

The Sinai-based leadership of Ansar Beit al-Maqdis has leaned toward an affiliation with the Islamic State for months, said several other Western officials. In October, two envoys of Ansar Beit al-Maqdis traveled to Syria to meet face-to-face with Islamic State leaders, pressing for money and weapons and discussing a pledge of loyalty.
The dispute in Ansar Beit al-Maqdis over its affiliation with the Islamic State could yet split the group into two wings, with the Nile Valley leaders remaining apart, Western officials say. As recently as last week, the group formally denied published reports that the affiliation had already taken place, a possible indication of the internal divisions.

Some Egyptians, including supporters of the government, argue that the heavy-handed approach to the Sinai uprising may further inflame it, especially after the forced evacuation of the border areas.

“If there are three young people in each home, you guarantee that two of them would turn into Ansar Beit al-Maqdis militants,” said Abdel Rahim Ali, an analyst with close ties to the Egyptian intelligence services.

Reporting was contributed by Mark Mazzetti and Eric Schmitt from Washington, and Kareem Fahim, Asmaa al-Zohairy and Mohamad Adam from Cairo.


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/11/w...itant-group-pledges-loyalty-to-isis.html?_r=0
--------------------------------------

it is officially a war between the modern day Pharaoh and the modern day khawarij , will the MBs join ISIS in pursuit of revenge ??
 
.
if we can regain sainai back from isreali what chance do they have our army will win in the end the progress is a little slow for fear of civilian losses
 
. .
If all these muslim provide Islamic Shariah , then what next ? . They have to kill each other anyway. They always find reason to kill and slaughter each other. All worried about egyptian dancers and coffee shops.
 
.
if we can regain sainai back from isreali what chance do they have our army will win in the end the progress is a little slow for fear of civilian losses

It is more like Karma my friend. The chicken have come home to roost.

What started in egypt in the form of qutub & zuwahiri and quasi arab nationalism by jamal nasir && Anwar Sadaat has poisoned the religion and the region beyond repair.
 
.
VE
if we can regain sainai back from isreali what chance do they have our army will win in the end the progress is a little slow for fear of civilian losses
LOL at ur naive mentality, but then again that is the shit the Nasirit nationalists have been brainwashing u with since the 60s, CC n his dogs now will face their worst nightmare, they will be wishing ISIS r the peaceful MBs . Karma is a Biach :devil:
 
.
VE

LOL at ur naive mentality, but then again that is the shit the Nasirit nationalists have been brainwashing u with since the 60s, CC n his dogs now will face their worst nightmare, they will be wishing ISIS r the peaceful MBs . Karma is a Biach :devil:
i will leave the empty words to you let us wait and see what will happen
 
.
VE

LOL at ur naive mentality, but then again that is the shit the Nasirit nationalists have been brainwashing u with since the 60s, CC n his dogs now will face their worst nightmare, they will be wishing ISIS r the peaceful MBs . Karma is a Biach :devil:

Unless the situation on the ground in the Sinai has changed drastically overnight then ABMs decision to pledge its loyalty to IS does not change a thing. There will not be an influx of fighters since the state remains in control of all border crossings and ports and a facilitator of fighters (eg. Turkey) does not exist.

The path to Northern Sinai itself is practically closed with forces from the 3rd Army essentially encircling it to stop fighters from fleeing or entering the area of operations. The state of emergency in Northern Sinai itself which will last 3 months is a major hindrance in terms of movement (both for civs and mils).

The overwhelming majority of ABMs leadership have been killed in action or are in prison awaiting verdicts. As a result any influx of fighters will find it incredibly hard to organise and conduct any sort of operation let alone receive any kind of training.

With ISIS being hammered by coalition forces in Iraq and Syria they don't have any fighters to spare and thus the only volunteers AMB may get are untrained fanatics who will not have the skills and drills to pose a threat to the forces in the Sinai.

Their only hope is an operation by Ansar Alsharia in Libya, but they are pinned down fighting Libyan Gov forces and Haftar in Libya and any operation against Egypt will end incredibly badly and may just result in direct Egyptian military involvement in Libya. Plus, now that Egypt is officially fighting ISIS (although it provides the coalition with political and intelligence support) it will be provided with support from the international coalition if required.

Please go join your comrades who are being killed and arrested by the dozen daily.
 
.
if we can regain sainai back from isreali what chance do they have our army will win in the end the progress is a little slow for fear of civilian losses

Good luck to Egypt Armed forces and hope fully they will contain these terrorists. Can't see Egypt being run by dogs who don't believe in any humanity or civilisation.
 
. .
CAIRO — They have slaughtered hundreds of Egyptian soldiers and police officers, recruited experienced fighters and staged increasingly sophisticated raids from the Western desert to the Sinai Peninsula. They have beheaded informants and killed an American in a carjacking, say Western officials familiar with intelligence reports.

On Monday, Egypt’s most dangerous militant group, Ansar Beit al-Maqdis, also pledged obedience to the organization that calls itself the Islamic State, becoming its first significant international affiliate in the bet that the link will provide new money, weapons and recruits to battle the government in Cairo.

The affiliation could pull the militant group away from its current, almost exclusive focus on attacking Egyptian military and security forces toward the Islamic State’s indiscriminate mass killings of civilians. The pledge alone could undermine the government’s efforts to win the trust of Western tourists, a vital source of hard currency.The decision injects the Islamic State into the most populous and historically most influential Arab nation, a milestone weeks into an American-led bombing campaign against its strongholds in Syria and Iraq. The endorsement is a major victory for the Islamic State in its rivalry with Al Qaeda — a group with deep Egyptian roots — and could now help recruit fighters and affiliates far beyond Egypt.
The link is also the latest manifestation of a swirling descent into violence around the region amid the dashed hopes for democracy of the Arab Spring uprisings three years ago.

But in practical terms, the Islamic State could also share resources — from its wealth of stolen money and oil, seized-weapons stores or jihadi-world prestige — to add new fuel to the Egyptian group’s insurgency at a critical turning point.

In recent weeks, Ansar Beit al-Maqdis has come under a withering crackdown by the Egyptian military, which has begun the evacuation and destruction of hundreds of homes in an attempt to eradicate the group from its havens in northern Sinai. But at the same time the group has confounded the confident predictions of Egyptian officials that it would soon be defeated, raising fears that the fight may just be beginning.

“The organized army is in confrontation with a group of disorganized ghosts,” said Ahmed Sakr, a government official working on economic development in Sinai, who said that the military’s “brute force” there was alienating the population while scattering fighters across the country. “I am very worried that there is now going to be more instability in the west, and Ansar Beit al-Maqdis will make inroads into Cairo and the big cities.”


Having killed hundreds of soldiers and police officers in a rampage of violent retaliation for the military ouster of the Islamist president last year, Ansar Beit al-Maqdis has more recently carried out a handful of increasingly sophisticated and deadly attacks on military camps at both the eastern and western extremes of the country, according to Western officials and Egyptian analysts familiar with intelligence reports on militant activity in the region.

An attack in the Western desert on July 19 killed at least 21 soldiers, and another on Oct. 24 in Sinai killed at least 31, the officials say, and both demonstrated that Ansar Beit al-Maqdis has now recruited more skilled and experienced fighters.

Most alarmingly for the Egyptian military, Egyptian leaders believe the group has developed military informants with inside information about army deployments, according to several Western and Egyptian officials.

In the Oct. 24 attack, for example, the militants appeared to know about the confidential movements of senior officers and reinforcement routes, the officials say. The fighters also displayed skill at targeting mortar fire as well as the confidence to continue their operation even under gunfire during a prolonged firefight, they say.

“This is not just planting a bomb and running,” said Diaa Rashwan, a researcher on Islamist groups at the Al Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies here. “To be able to keep attacking, that means you have real experience.”

Ansar Beit al-Maqdis fighters were also behind the killing of an American during a desert carjacking in August and may have been linked to other attacks targeting desert-ready, four-wheel drive S.U.V.s, according to Western officials — a development that has prompted the Egyptian government to order international energy companies to restrict their fleets of sport utility vehicles. Apache, British Petroleum and British Gas have all complied with the measure; spokesmen for all three companies and the Egyptian government declined to comment.

Some Western officials question the evidence linking the group to other carjackings besides the killing in August of the American, an Apache employee named William Henderson, 58. But there is a consensus that the group has confounded attempts by Egyptian security officials to contain it by tightly controlling the limited transit points across the Suez Canal into the Sinai Peninsula.

Western officials say Ansar Beit al-Maqdis includes cells of fighters scattered on both sides of the Nile. And they have capitalized on porous borders to obtain refuge and supplies from sympathetic militants to both the east and west of the country — in lawless eastern Libya on one side, and in the Palestinian territory of Gaza bordering Sinai on the other.

In Sinai, the suspicion that critical aid has flowed through the network of smuggling tunnels into Gaza is one reason that the Egyptian government took the drastic step of evacuating and destroying the homes of more than 1,100 families, all in a zone near the border.

In an audio statement on Monday pledging to “obey” Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the Islamic State’s leader and self-proclaimed caliph, Ansar Beit al-Maqdis also repeated a call to rise up against Egypt’s military-backed government — a trademark of its previous statements.


“To our people in Egypt, what are you waiting for after the violation of your dignity?” the statement asked. “After shedding the blood of your sons on the hands of this reckless tyrant and his soldiers? When will you take out your swords to face your enemies?”

It also added a familiar slap at the Muslim Brotherhood, the mainstream Islamist group that dominated Egypt’s free elections and backed the deposed president, Mohamed Morsi, only to end up crushed by the military takeover. “Shameful peace will do you no good, nor will blasphemous democracy,” the statement said, “and you have seen how it has claimed its upholders and their masters.”

Details about Ansar Beit al-Maqdis are scarce, in part because the Egyptian military limits access to the areas of Sinai that are the front line of its battle against the group. Its name means Supporters of Jerusalem, and Western officials estimate that it includes only hundreds or perhaps a few thousand fighters.

Western officials familiar with intelligence reports on the group’s internal communications say that a faction of Ansar Beit al-Maqdis based in the Nile Valley opposed the affiliation with the Islamic State. They worried that its reputation for careless violence will alienate other Egyptians, especially the disaffected Islamist youth that Ansar Beit al-Maqdis has sought to enlist.

Some Nile Valley leaders of Ansar Beit al-Maqdis also appear to remember the lessons of an earlier Islamist insurgency, centered in Upper Egypt in the 1990s. Mass killings of tourists and others backfired, damaging the economy, alienating the Egyptian public and increasing support for the government’s security forces.

Ansar Beit al-Maqdis’s previous statements have also looked to Al Qaeda for leadership, and some of the Nile Valley faction remain loyal to Al Qaeda as it has become a rival to the Islamic State for pre-eminence in the jihadi world.

The Sinai-based leadership of Ansar Beit al-Maqdis has leaned toward an affiliation with the Islamic State for months, said several other Western officials. In October, two envoys of Ansar Beit al-Maqdis traveled to Syria to meet face-to-face with Islamic State leaders, pressing for money and weapons and discussing a pledge of loyalty.
The dispute in Ansar Beit al-Maqdis over its affiliation with the Islamic State could yet split the group into two wings, with the Nile Valley leaders remaining apart, Western officials say. As recently as last week, the group formally denied published reports that the affiliation had already taken place, a possible indication of the internal divisions.

Some Egyptians, including supporters of the government, argue that the heavy-handed approach to the Sinai uprising may further inflame it, especially after the forced evacuation of the border areas.

“If there are three young people in each home, you guarantee that two of them would turn into Ansar Beit al-Maqdis militants,” said Abdel Rahim Ali, an analyst with close ties to the Egyptian intelligence services.

Reporting was contributed by Mark Mazzetti and Eric Schmitt from Washington, and Kareem Fahim, Asmaa al-Zohairy and Mohamad Adam from Cairo.


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/11/w...itant-group-pledges-loyalty-to-isis.html?_r=0
--------------------------------------

it is officially a war between the modern day Pharaoh and the modern day khawarij , will the MBs join ISIS in pursuit of revenge ??

hope and pray Egyptian along with rest of arabian states armed forced exterminate this ISIS type extremist scum from their soil
 
. . .
VE

LOL at ur naive mentality, but then again that is the shit the Nasirit nationalists have been brainwashing u with since the 60s, CC n his dogs now will face their worst nightmare, they will be wishing ISIS r the peaceful MBs . Karma is a Biach :devil:

the qutbi/tableeghi/deobandi are the dogs that needs to be fumed to death... just like how the mongols fumed the hashisheen...
 
.
Egypt’s Islamists try to distance themselves from IS - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East

For the first time since the July 30 Revolution, Egyptian Islamists agree on refusing to call the Islamic State (IS) a terrorist group. They reject the international coalition to fight IS and see it as an attempt to create division in the region and to target political Islam in general.

Summary⎙ Print As Egypt’s Islamist groups fail to take a common stance on domestic politics, they agree at least that the Islamic State is giving political Islam, as a movement, a bad reputation.
Author Reham Mokbel Posted November 10, 2014
Translator(s)Cynthia Milan
This agreement, however, reflects the Islamists’ state of confusion in Egypt after their image lost ground, due to IS’ violent acts and that the group was put into the same basket as the Islamists.

In an interview with Al-Monitor, Yusri Hamad, the vice president of the Salafist National Party, expressed his refusal to describe IS as an extremist or terrorist group, since he does not know its ideology and has not read much about it. “Perhaps some Iraqis, from within IS components, were tortured, which means IS does not represent jihadist groups. Many IS members joined the group as a reaction to the torture they endured under [Nouri] al-Maliki’s government or the US occupation,” he said.

Islamists, in Egypt as well as in other countries, seem to be unable to forget the US actions against the Islamists, after the 9/11 attack by al-Qaeda. Although the United States began campaigns against terrorism after the Sept. 11 attacks, and although it focused on extremist groups in many regions, such as Afghanistan, Iraq and others, most Islamists believed that the United States was fighting Islam in general and not just terrorist groups, Hamad said.

In this context, Hamad condemned US interference in the region and considered it to be an attempt to create a new reality and overlook the massacres it is committing. “Why are they fighting IS but not [President Abdel Fattah al-] Sisi? Why are they fighting IS but not the Houthis?” he asked angrily. Hamad believes that the international coalition was not created to fight IS, but for specific interests. He severely criticized Egypt for joining the coalition, saying that it was trying its best to become part of the international system and overlook its suppressing policies.

Hamad was surprised by the media wave against IS, since it did not mention the massacres committed by the US invasion against Iraq and the massacres against Muslims in several areas, like Burma and Central Africa. “The Islamic movement and the Islamic Awakenings have been attacked for 60 years. This is an episode of the series of attacks against Islamists,” he said.

Vice president of the Arab relations committee at the Salafist National Party, Yahi al-Safi Saadallah, agreed with Hamad that IS was a mutual US-Iranian-Syrian creation. He linked the coalition’s inability to eliminate IS, despite the group’s primitive weapons, as an attempt to create division in the region.

Saadallah described IS as a group of extremists, and as an expansion of the Kharijite ideology, which accuses Muslims of disobedience and considers their killing as “halal,” or permitted in Islamic law. However, he refused to call them terrorists and jihadists, since these are terms promoted by the United States. He accused the Turkish and Qatari media of feeding the feeling of injustice toward the Islamic movement (IS). He also believes that there is a war against Islam in Egypt, which he thinks is wrong. Hamad regretted that this image has made the youth feel somewhat oppressed and humiliated, to a point that they found what they were looking for in IS.

It seems that IS’ accomplishments in controlling territory and expanding in both Iraq and Syria, by taking advantage of the chaos and the marginalization of the Sunnis, have pushed the Islamic movements to mobilize in Egypt. These movements are most probably taking advantage of the country’s political and security instability as well as the deterioration of the economic situation, to tighten the noose on the opposition and raise the banner of Islam as IS did.

Therefore, it was not surprising that the chief coordinator of the Salafist Front in Egypt, Khaled Saeed, called for the organization of an Islamist revolution and holding protests against the regime on Nov. 28, while many reports said the organization sought armed actions.

In an interview with Al-Monitor, Saeed denied that the movement was armed, unlike what has been circulated in the media. However, he said that the movement adopts ways that are different from the Muslim Brotherhood's, without giving more details to this effect.

He criticized the Muslim Brotherhood as it is the largest Islamist group with potential to make a change, and yet it remains peaceful despite all the injustices they are being subjected to. "The terrorist regime portrays us as killers. But the regime itself is IS. It is killing us, torturing us and shedding our blood," he said.

Saeed described IS as “an Islamist organization waging a battle of national liberation, based on a certain doctrine, against the American, crusade, Zionist, Jewish and Shiite hegemony, which has led to the killing of Sunni Muslims."

Mamdouh al-Sheikh, a researcher in Islamic movements, said that IS has deleted the idea of peaceful demonstration among some Muslims, given the success it has achieved with violence. Some journalists condemned the idea of an Islamic caliphate due to IS behavior, considering that the Islamic movement became a threat to the national and democratic state

In his interview with Al-Monitor, Sheikh stressed the foolishness of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Syria in dealing with IS. "The Muslim Brotherhood in Syria said they would not take part in the coalition, unless the Assad regime is targeted. Meanwhile, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt did not sufficiently condemn IS' actions. Some thought that IS would serve as a means of pressure against the [Egyptian] regime, forcing it to include Islamists," Sheikh said.

As for IS' impact on Egypt, Sheikh said that the group could appeal to some Islamists who would pledge allegiance to it, but it would not be at the core of the overall (Islamist) movement.

For his part, Saadallah put forth three possible scenarios regarding IS' impact on Islamists in Egypt. First, people might sympathize with the group due to the "unwise" security measures of the regime toward Islamists and the delayed reconciliation.

Second, some might ideologically sympathize with IS, which would be reflected at a third stage, in movements on the ground, and therefore countless IS sympathizers would emerge.

......................
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom