N.Siddiqui
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2015
- Messages
- 9,714
- Reaction score
- 13
- Country
- Location
If Mil Establishment surrender to the collective will of the people and let the country go for the elections, the political stability will lead to economic stability in the shortest period of time.
Surrendering to the will of the people is so much better than surrendering to the enemy physically, disgracefully just like 1971.
Still power drunk and not ceding space to people.
Nawishta-e-deewar parh lain, deewar sey na lagain Awam ko.
All over the world Mil Establishment works for the collective will of the people, collective good of the country, only in Pakistan there is a an anomaly where the Establishment is holding onto the status quo, keeping the hagemon and coercion, doing the political engineering and maneuvering, conniving with parties known for corruption and money laundering to throw out the popular governments and imposing them on the country without the people mandate.
They should decipher that if a large percentage of people in the country, generally, support a particular party or a leader, and the Mil Establishment have grievances, differences with the party leader, they need to put it aside for the collective goodwill of the people, the country.
If the Mil Establishment love the people and the country, shouldn't they love and respect what the people of the country love and respect.
So simple yet so elusive.
Surrendering to the will of the people is so much better than surrendering to the enemy physically, disgracefully just like 1971.
Still power drunk and not ceding space to people.
Nawishta-e-deewar parh lain, deewar sey na lagain Awam ko.
All over the world Mil Establishment works for the collective will of the people, collective good of the country, only in Pakistan there is a an anomaly where the Establishment is holding onto the status quo, keeping the hagemon and coercion, doing the political engineering and maneuvering, conniving with parties known for corruption and money laundering to throw out the popular governments and imposing them on the country without the people mandate.
They should decipher that if a large percentage of people in the country, generally, support a particular party or a leader, and the Mil Establishment have grievances, differences with the party leader, they need to put it aside for the collective goodwill of the people, the country.
If the Mil Establishment love the people and the country, shouldn't they love and respect what the people of the country love and respect.
So simple yet so elusive.
Last edited: