What's new

Microsoft’s default font is at the center of a government corruption case

Well hiring the services of some forensic expert does not give his nation to interfere into Pakistan's internal affairs. He got paid and that's all.

But the matter of the information becomes documentation and open for debate. After all, it is just debate which is killing you for some reasons. Should we ban freedom of speech/expression to satiate your insecurity?
 
.
But the matter of the information becomes documentation and open for debate. After all, it is just debate which is killing you for some reasons. Should we ban freedom of speech/expression to satiate your insecurity?

Part of the UK rules
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part35/pd_part35
2.4 Experts should make it clear –

(a) when a question or issue falls outside their expertise; and

(b) when they are not able to reach a definite opinion, for example because they have insufficient information.

If they had insufficient information to declare the document as forgery they were bound to declare it. The Sharifs will have to take the forensic expert to court to prove his/her assessment was wrong. That won't happen. The onus of proving the documents were genuine is now on Maryam.

The last resort:

Thin Layer Chromatography

However, on very rare occasions, chemical analysis of inks utilising thin layer chromatography is necessary and can be undertaken but requires the removal of a short section of an ink stroke for analysis, i.e. this is a "destructive" test. This procedure is generally used as a last resort after all other examinations by all parties' experts and then only with the written permission of the owner of the document in question or on instruction by the Court.
 
.
But the matter of the information becomes documentation and open for debate. After all, it is just debate which is killing you for some reasons. Should we ban freedom of speech/expression to satiate your insecurity?

lolzzzz who is talking about expression of freedom...

By the way, why futile imbecile patwaris are always looking for foreign support especially from India?
 
. .
Please, talk with facts. Calibri font was available in 2005. But, please don't call me a noora, pleaseee..

View attachment 410645
@Syed.Ali.Haider (FYI sir)
You can search for yourself, but all the results are going to come up from recent time, so restrict your search to the year 2005 ( you can do that on Google from tools button).

or use the link below to search
https://www.google.com/search?q=`calibri.ttf&num=50&client=firefox-b-ab&source=lnt&tbs=cdr:1,cd_min:1/1/2005,cd_max:31/1/2007&tbm=#tbs=cdr:1,cd_min:1/1/2005,cd_max:31/1/2007&q=calibri.ttf

juj.jpg

====
==========
1) Calibri version 2.00 came with Office Mac 2008

Untitledhh.jpg


2) myfontfree.com << domain age: 300 days (created on 2016-09-14)

3) wfonts.com << domain age: 285 days (created on 2016-09-29)

4) the github link takes to EvanPurkhiser page and his OLDEST gist is only 6 year old.

-----------

Webmasters can make crawlers index their webpages on a timeline of your choosing for SEO purposes. I can set you up a free wordpress blog, upload JIT report on it, and fool crawlers into believing that it was uploaded on August 14, 1947. Timeline for links on google search amounts to bullshit and only a noora would take it for proof.
-----------

Reply when you can. :lol:
 
.
lolzzzz who is talking about expression of freedom...

By the way, why futile imbecile patwaris are always looking for foreign support especially from India?

You are the one who appears to be roadblock to freedom of speech and expression which is the whole point of debate here.

Why bother debate? Then why the education? Why the brain then? Let's live like jaahil people with blind belief that everything that is put on the papers should be taken as Bible/Holy Quran.

I am surprised especially with the people like you who believe in the positive change appears to be stubborn when it comes to matter of freedom of speech and expression.
 
.
You are the one who appears to be roadblock to freedom of speech and expression which is the whole point of debate here.

Why bother debate? Then why the education? Why the brain then? Let's live like jaahil people with blind belief that everything that is put on the papers should be taken as Bible/Holy Quran.

I am surprised especially with the people like you who believe in the positive change appears to be stubborn when it comes to matter of freedom of speech and expression.
Lying and falsifying the facts won't take you far though I know you believe in the contrary
 
.

The debate is about why freedom of speech and expression is being discouraged to suspend the debate for the curiosity. We are not talking about the case yet, at least on the content of the case. Quite frankly, i am waiting for more information like many members here. Lately, we have been getting mixed signals which most of them have not been confirmed.

Lying and falsifying the facts won't take you far though I know you believe in the contrary

You are against freedom of speech and expression which is the key to discover the truth or more information to get to the bottom of the case. Who are you fooling here?

I didn't even get started on the case yet. And here you are already branded me liar for encouraging freedom of speech and expression for stimulative debate for curiosity which is the key to generate the output of this case.
 
Last edited:
.
The debate is about why freedom of speech and expression is being discouraged to suspend the debate for the curiosity. We are not talking about the case yet, at least on the content of the case. Quite frankly, i am waiting for more information like many members here. Lately, we have been getting mixed signals which most of them have not been confirmed.



You are against freedom of speech and expression which is the key to discover the truth or more information to get to the bottom of the case. Who are you fooling here?
The truth is on our side and you people have been caught cheating pants down and soon you will be sent to gallows and you know it very well but you're trying to delay it as much as you can and we, the people of Pakistan, are enjoying your predicament.
 
. .
The debate is about why freedom of speech and expression is being discouraged to suspend the debate for the curiosity. We are not talking about the case yet, at least on the content of the case. Quite frankly, i am waiting for more information like many members here. Lately, we have been getting mixed signals which most of them have not been confirmed.

Debate is good but in this case ignoring the rest of the report while drooling over a font is unhealthy. Even if a different font was used, removing of the staples also show tampering. Even if it wasn't tampered with, the BVI record show that this document was false. Even if the BVI record was wrong, the rest of the evidence shows Maryam was the beneficial owner. Even if she wasn't the beneficial owner the rest of the JIT report shows the entire Sharif stance is shot through with deception and lies.
 
.
The truth is on our side and you people have been caught cheating pants down and soon you will be sent to gallows and you know it very well but you're trying to delay it as much as you can and we, the people of Pakistan, are enjoying your predicament.

How do you know the truth? You are against the freedom of speech and expression for stimulative debate to discover the truth, remember?

You are against the truth, yet you appear to be telling the truth for being against the truth. Quite fitting for the irony here!!! :D
 
.
The truth is on our side and you people have been caught cheating pants down and soon you will be sent to gallows and you know it very well but you're trying to delay it as much as you can and we, the people of Pakistan, are enjoying your predicament.
This canandian has very little knowledge about Pakistani history and cant even read urdu its useless debating with him when you confront him with facts he regurgitates debunked bs over and over again :D
 
.
Debate is good but in this case ignoring the rest of the report while drooling over a font is unhealthy. Even if a different font was used, removing of the staples also show tampering. Even if it wasn't tampered with, the BVI record show that this document was false. Even if the BVI record was wrong, the rest of the evidence shows Maryam was the beneficial owner. Even if she wasn't the beneficial owner the rest of the JIT report shows the entire Sharif stance is shot through with deception and lies.

I am not denying anything. I think you misread my posts. My post was about why @war&peace is discouraging other member for debating on this topic to get to the bottom of the case. As for me, i am waiting for more information and the case will become clear in the next few days. I haven't said anything about the case so far.

This canandian has very little knowledge about Pakistani history and cant even read urdu its useless debating with him when you confront him with facts he regurgitates debunked bs over and over again :D

Too bad, i don't understand your post. Only if you have posted your post in English for Canadian member to understand you. Look like i have to learn Urdu to be able to debate with the burger like you here. #Aap bohat jaldi ghussa ho jaatay hain bhaisaab!!! :D
 
.
Too bad, i don't understand your post. Only if you have posted your post in English for Canadian member to understand you. :D
No rebuttals in your book for this comment :-(
Mariyam should update guidelines for her paid trolls :D

All they do know is criticize army:rofl:
Did Bajwa forced them to use Callibri font and disown their uncle? :D
 
.
Back
Top Bottom