What's new

Maritime Patrol Aircraft: A Japanese Perspective

Aepsilons

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
24,960
Reaction score
118
Country
Japan
Location
United States
By Keizo Kitagawa


In contrast to Britain's decision to cancel the Nimrod MRA4 in 2010, Japan has developed her own maritime patrol aircraft for the 21st century, the P-1.
As the UK looks to fill the gap in its maritime patrol aircraft (MPA) capability created by the cancellation of the Nimrod MRA4 programme, attention is focused on the United States and Boeing’s P8. However, on the other side of the world, another island nation is still pursuing a domestically developed MPA solution tailored to their specific requirements. Japan is the sixth largest exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the world and an archipelago of nearly 7000 islands which stretch more than 3,500 km to the east of the Eurasian Continent. MPA help to defend Japan and her interests in many ways. They undertake missions to defend Japan’s territory from infringement or attack, maintain the safety of sea lanes, assist with disaster relief and aid, and generally help maintain the maritime order of the area.

MPA maintains flexibility in ability to transition between situations and its varied roles with its superior mobility (high speed, wide range, and long endurance). MPA can be dispatched to remote maritime areas from mainland Japan, as well as being capable of undertaking surveillance missions. The Government of Japan sees investment in fixed wing MPA to be a necessity both now and going forwards.

Development of the Japanese P-1 MPA started in 2001 at the same time as the production of the XC-2 next generation cargo aircraft. Initially they were independent designs but it was decided to make certain components common to both aircraft in order to reduce development costs. In the unstable and uncertain climate of East Asia after the Cold War, Japan was aware that it required the capability to respond quickly and with flexibility to diverse emergencies which might occur. Under the circumstances, it became apparent that the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Forces (JMSDF)’s P-3C Orion MPA’s limited capabilities were not sufficient to satisfy all mission requirements. The maiden flight of XP-1 was made in September 2007, and the production of P-1 started in 2008 and is continued by Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI). At present, Japan plans to procure up to 70 P-1 MPAs to replace her aging P-3C fleet.

LI54859C2E156EE.jpg


Image courtesy of the JMSDF

P-1 is larger than the P-3C, its speed and range have been improved by a factor of between 1.2 and 1.3. As for its onboard systems, improvements have been achieved in all areas, including to the acoustic system. Advanced avionics including the integrated display and head-up display, significantly reduce pilot workload. The mission package consists of acoustic sensors, radar and Combat Direction System (CDS) for central control which requires a crew of eleven to operate. The JMSDF requires a high level of interoperability with the US Navy, and the P-1 is designed to the same standard in this regard as the P-3C it replaces.

Due to the complicated and dangerous circumstances the crew and aircraft may experience in service, the crew and command center must cooperate seamlessly to respond with appropriate force, and so sophisticated C4ISR capabilities were requested.

The P-1 has high performance onboard computer systems, large capacity network, and high speed processing capabilities which can process a large volume of information quickly, resulting in improved mission effectiveness. This ability to transmit correct on-site information, locations and images from the mission location to the command center in large volume transfers at a high speed is indispensable.

To improve warning and surveillance performance, MPAs must be able to identify the nationality, type, configuration and name of a target ship from a great distance. The onboard ISAR (Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar) can identify ship types whilst the SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) can identify moving targets and landforms on land. The high resolution IR/EO (Infrared, Electric Optic) System can then pick up detailed features of the target. The onboard computer can then identify the nationality, type and configuration of a target ship by cross referencing several kinds of electromagnetic waves radiated by a target ship.

The capability to hunt a submerged submarine or one cruising in shallow water was deemed a necessary requirement of MPAs due to the geographical characteristics of the sea areas around Japan. Using its high performance acoustic processing system, which has improved signal processing capability over previous models, the P-1 is able to track modern, almost silent high performance submarines. The high powered radar and advanced IR/ EO systems are necessary to detect a miniaturized periscope breaking the surface of the ocean.

P-1 has a relatively high transit speed in order to reach sea lanes far off-shore. If arrival to the site is delayed after acquiring information about hostile submarine(s), the area to be searched (AOP: Area of Probability) would increase, reducing the probability of detection. Therefore, the P-1 has been designed with high speed capability to arrive at the site in shorter time than the turboprop driven P-3C it replaces. However, the P-1 can also cruise at slow speeds for increased endurance (low fuel consumption) which is necessary for tactical manoeuvres on site.

The P-1’s high altitude performance improves on that of the P-3C in order to allow transit to search areas in any weather conditions. High altitude also increases the coverage of long range radar search operations. The P-1’s has low flying capability is similar to that of the P-3C’s for accurate launching of torpedoes and sono-buoys.

The P-1 was designed with survivability under fire in mind. It has sufficient self-protection capabilities against SAMs (Surface to Air Missiles) from hostile ships or submarines, including mobile SAMs on small unknown boats. Missile warning devices detect approaching hostile missiles and issue warnings to the crew. The P-1 has missile countermeasures such as chaff (electronic deception) and flare (infra-red deception), as well as good flight performance and maneuverability coupled with structural strength sufficient to allow sudden or violent evasive maneuvers. The P-1 is painted in a low visibility color, reducing the chance of visual detection and its infra-red signature has been reduced, making the tracking by missiles difficult. Explosion proof fuel tanks and multi-redundant systems also contribute to the aircrafts survivability against missile strikes.

P-1 carries a variety of high performance weapons on- board against a multitude of threats, giving the aircraft the ability of responding to threats in a timely and successful way, including the use of lethal force if necessary. It is capable of launching Maverick missiles, which have provide accurate target identification capability and can be used even against small maneuverable targets. The P-1 is also equipped with non-lethal but easily recognizable weapons used for warning against unknown boats performing suspicious or illegal behaviors. The P-1’s onboard computer also gives a sophisticated selective attack capability, which selects the most serious threats among many approaching targets.

The P-1 is an environmentally friendly aircraft despite its high performance. Noise levels produced in flight are less than those of the P-3C and the aircraft complies fully with the latest ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) regulations for noise. The four turbofan engines of the P-1 employ a variety of technologies pursuing environment friendliness through fuel efficiency and noise reduction technologies.

In summary, the P-1 fixed-wing patrol aircraft is equipped with systems which make the aircraft very capable and suitable for its role as an integral part of Japan’s maritime defence and the maintenance of stability in the region. Under the Three Principles on Transfer of Defence Equipment and Technology adapted on 1st April 2014, the aircraft could prove a fruitful source of international defence and industrial cooperation.

Japan’s decision to develop its own indigenous MPA tailored to its own requirements stands as a marked contrast to the majority of maritime nations looking to chose between a few American and European offerings. As the P1 enters service, many air forces and navies around the world will be watching with interest.

Captain Keizo Kitagawa, JMSDF
Captain Kitagawa is currently Defence Attaché to the UK at the Embassy of Japan

RUSI - RUSI Defence Systems
 
@Nihonjin1051

Can you provide some specs of the cabin (lenght, width) of the P1 platform? There were rumors about an AWACS version of it, but Japan selected the E-2D now right? Is an AWACS version still possible?
 
@Nihonjin1051

Can you provide some specs of the cabin (lenght, width) of the P1 platform? There were rumors about an AWACS version of it, but Japan selected the E-2D now right? Is an AWACS version still possible?


The length of the cabin is 38 meters. As for AWACs, these are provided for by our E-767s and our E2 Hawkeyes. There was some technology transfer that i remember, and possibility of attaching AWACs on the Kawasaki P-1s is probable.

-----------

It is a modern aircraft, carbon fibre structures, very advanced fibre optic flight control system, Active Electronically Scanned Array radar, a full ESM system, MAD boom, combat and stores management software, satellite/radio/LINK and electro optical systems, all the bells and whistles one might expect in a maritime patrol aircraft. A large bomb bay, rotary sonobuoy launcher, extensive self defence systems and external pylons complete the mix. Scouting the internet for weapon loads and performance information produces any number of competing answers but the middle ground seems to indicate 30 sonobuoys in ready to launch tubes plus 70 extra on board, 8 external pylons (2,000lb class), 4,500nm range, 9 tonnes payload in the bomb bay and pylons, 44,000ft ceiling and 450 knots cruise speed.


P1 with Maverick

At one stage the JMSDF was planning on purchasing 80 P1’s but whether this is still the case is uncertain, so far, 10 have been purchased with the most recent programme numbers being reported as 70.
 
but Japan selected the E-2D now right?


The length of the cabin is 38 meters. As for AWACs, these are provided for by our E-767s and our E2 Hawkeyes.
-----------
What can I say, it's a jet version of the P3 and I like it!
Don't get the logic of JMSDF purchasing E2's.

They can get the regular AWACS optimized/modified for maritime environments. E2's would have made sense had Japan needed an AEW&C that could operate off their fleet(an aircraft carrier for example)

For shore based sensor requirements, it makes no sense to go for E2's.

Am I missing something here?
 
Don't get the logic of JMSDF purchasing E2's.

They can get the regular AWACS optimized for maritime environments. E2's would have made sense had Japan needed an AEW&C that could operate off their fleet(an aircraft carrier for example)

For shore based sensor requirements, it makes no sense to go for E2's.

Am I missing something here?

As an archipelago of almost 7,000 islands, with territories deep in the Western Pacific as well as the Sea of Japan , E2s are necessary for long maritime patrol. The recent purchase of more E2s goes in line with Japan's intention to build larger Aircraft Carriers that will accommodate more air inventory -- and the projection of our combined Naval-Air Power.

Secondarily, purchasing these E2s serve our purpose because we will reverse-engineer one, and apply that to say -- future plans.

For illustrative purposes, here is Japan's Maritime Domain:

617px-EEZ_of_Japan_01.png
 
As an archipelago of almost 7,000 islands, with territories deep in the Western Pacific as well as the Sea of Japan , E2s are necessary for long maritime patrol. The recent purchase of more E2s goes in line with Japan's intention to build larger Aircraft Carriers that will accommodate more air inventory -- and the projection of our combined Naval-Air Power.

Secondarily, purchasing these E2s serve our purpose because we will reverse-engineer one, and apply that to say -- future plans.

For illustrative purposes, here is Japan's Maritime Domain:
My friend the range of an E2 D is limited when compared to E3 or a 'full fledged' AWACS. So it makes more sense for Japan to buy E3's instead of the E2's to have MDA(Maritime Domain Awareness) over its vast maritime territories.

As I said, the sensor payload on E3's can be optimized and altered to make it more suitable for the maritime domain.

And Japan has not announced any plan to build Carriers with Cats. I believe Cats are required to launch E2's off of a Carrier.

So for what purpose exactly did JMSDF buy it? Political reasons?
 
My friend the range of an E2 D is limited when compared to E3 or a 'full fledged' AWACS. So it makes more sense for Japan to buy E3's instead of the E2's to have MDA(Maritime Domain Awareness) over its vast maritime territories.

The JASDF operates the Boeing E-767 AWAC, in fact, we have 4 of these in our inventory. These are used to cover our vast maritime territory and to ensure MDA coverage. However, the 12 or so E2-Hawkeyes allows us a greater coverage of our maritime domain. True, the E2s have an effective range of 1,500 miles. But Japan is also purchasing additional E2-Ds . So we are actually adding to our current number. We did originally consider the Boeing 737 AEW+C, but felt confident with the E2-D.

And Japan has not announced any plan to build Carriers with Cats. I believe Cats are required to launch E2's off of a Carrier.

So for what purpose exactly did JMSDF buy it? Political reasons?

All of these will be addressed. Soon. :)

It look like jet engine P-3C, but what capabilities it has when compared with modern P-3C and specially latest P-8s?

One electronic aspect that makes the Kawasaki P-1s very unique is that she will have an AI (artificial intelligence) on board to assist in tactical coordination, to new developments of a spacious bomb bay , making this capable of striking sub threats, to even being used for tactical anti-ground strikes -- in the event tactical adaptation is necessary.
 
It look like jet engine P-3C, but what capabilities it has when compared with modern P-3C and specially latest P-8s?

Japan’s new P-1 takes over surveillance mission from JMSDF P-3C maritime patrol aircraft | global aviation report

In the unstable and uncertain climate of East Asia after the Cold War, Japan was aware that it required the capability to respond quickly and with flexibility to diverse emergencies which might occur. Under the circumstances, it became apparent that the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Forces (JMSDF)’s P-3C Orion MPA’s limited capabilities were not sufficient to satisfy all mission requirements.

P-1 is larger than the P-3C, its speed and range have been improved by a factor of between 1.2 and 1.3. As for its onboard systems, improvements have been achieved in all areas, including to the acoustic system. Advanced avionics including the integrated display and head-up display, significantly reduce pilot workload. The mission package consists of acoustic sensors, radar and Combat Direction System (CDS) for central control which requires a crew of eleven to operate. The JMSDF requires a high level of interoperability with the US Navy, and the P-1 is designed to the same standard in this regard as the P-3C it replaces.
Due to the complicated and dangerous circumstances the crew and aircraft may experience in service, the crew and command center must cooperate seamlessly to respond with appropriate force, and so sophisticated C4ISR capabilities were requested.
The P-1 has high performance onboard computer systems, large capacity network, and high speed processing capabilities which can process a large volume of information quickly, resulting in improved mission effectiveness. This ability to transmit correct on-site information, locations and images from the mission location to the command center in large volume transfers at a high speed is indispensable.
To improve warning and surveillance performance, MPAs must be able to identify the nationality, type, configuration and name of a target ship from a great distance. The onboard ISAR (Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar) can identify ship types whilst the SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) can identify moving targets and landforms on land. The high resolution IR/EO (Infrared, Electric Optic) System can then pick up detailed features of the target. The onboard computer can then identify the nationality, type and configuration of a target ship by cross referencing several kinds of electromagnetic waves radiated by a target ship.
The capability to hunt a submerged submarine or one cruising in shallow water was deemed a necessary requirement of MPAs due to the geographical characteristics of the sea areas around Japan. Using its high performance acoustic processing system, which has improved signal processing capability over previous models, the P-1 is able to track modern, almost silent high performance submarines. The high powered radar and advanced IR/ EO systems are necessary to detect a miniaturized periscope breaking the surface of the ocean.
P-1 has a relatively high transit speed in order to reach sea lanes far off-shore. If arrival to the site is delayed after acquiring information about hostile submarine(s), the area to be searched (AOP: Area of Probability) would increase, reducing the probability of detection. Therefore, the P-1 has been designed with high speed capability to arrive at the site in shorter time than the turboprop driven P-3C it replaces. However, the P-1 can also cruise at slow speeds for increased endurance (low fuel consumption) which is necessary for tactical manoeuvres on site.
The P-1’s high altitude performance improves on that of the P-3C in order to allow transit to search areas in any weather conditions. High altitude also increases the coverage of long range radar search operations. The P-1’s has low flying capability is similar to that of the P-3C’s for accurate launching of torpedoes and sono-buoys.
The P-1 was designed with survivability under fire in mind. It has sufficient self-protection capabilities against SAMs (Surface to Air Missiles) from hostile ships or submarines, including mobile SAMs on small unknown boats. Missile warning devices detect approaching hostile missiles and issue warnings to the crew. The P-1 has missile countermeasures such as chaff (electronic deception) and flare (infra-red deception), as well as good flight performance and maneuverability coupled with structural strength sufficient to allow sudden or violent evasive maneuvers. The P-1 is painted in a low visibility color, reducing the chance of visual detection and its infra-red signature has been reduced, making the tracking by missiles difficult. Explosion proof fuel tanks and multi-redundant systems also contribute to the aircrafts survivability against missile strikes.
P-1 carries a variety of high performance weapons on- board against a multitude of threats, giving the aircraft the ability of responding to threats in a timely and successful way, including the use of lethal force if necessary. It is capable of launching Maverick missiles, which have provide accurate target identification capability and can be used even against small maneuverable targets. The P-1 is also equipped with non-lethal but easily recognizable weapons used for warning against unknown boats performing suspicious or illegal behaviors. The P-1’s onboard computer also gives a sophisticated selective attack capability, which selects the most serious threats among many approaching targets.
The P-1 is an environmentally friendly aircraft despite its high performance. Noise levels produced in flight are less than those of the P-3C and the aircraft complies fully with the latest ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) regulations for noise. The four turbofan engines of the P-1 employ a variety of technologies pursuing environment friendliness through fuel efficiency and noise reduction technologies.
RUSI - RUSI Defence Systems

See also
Kawasaki XP-1 Maritime Patrol Aircraft - Naval Technology
US Navy P-8A Poseidon and JMSDF Kawasaki P-1 Maritime Patrol Aircraft [2048 x 1124] : MilitaryPorn

url


APz2kbI.jpg


Z8GYBre.jpg


P-1_flare.jpg


1667012.jpg


AH0gkKg.jpg
 
Last edited:
The length of the cabin is 38 meters. As for AWACs, these are provided for by our E-767s and our E2 Hawkeyes. There was some technology transfer that i remember, and possibility of attaching AWACs on the Kawasaki P-1s is probable.

Do you have the cabin width too? And how likely is an AWACS version when you replace the E-2Cs with new E-2Ds? Why does Japan make itself more dependent on the US in this field, when you have an own platform and the capability to develop an own radar system?
 
As an archipelago of almost 7,000 islands, with territories deep in the Western Pacific as well as the Sea of Japan , E2s are necessary for long maritime patrol. The recent purchase of more E2s goes in line with Japan's intention to build larger Aircraft Carriers that will accommodate more air inventory -- and the projection of our combined Naval-Air Power.

Secondarily, purchasing these E2s serve our purpose because we will reverse-engineer one, and apply that to say -- future plans.

For illustrative purposes, here is Japan's Maritime Domain:

617px-EEZ_of_Japan_01.png


Including Kurils? I don't think this map is correct.
 
Do you have the cabin width too? And how likely is an AWACS version when you replace the E-2Cs with new E-2Ds? Why does Japan make itself more dependent on the US in this field, when you have an own platform and the capability to develop an own radar system?

The move to develop the Kawasaki P-1 was a necessary one as it demonstrates an new phenomena in the Japanese Defense Industry to develop its own field and less reliance on American military supply. The success of the P-1s will ultimately lead to phase out our fleet of P-3C. As this defense industry steps closer to greater self reliance, it will necessitate our development of indigenous AWAC systems. To be honest, our ban on military arms sales also included a provision that prevented R&D cooperation with foreign partners, this inhibition was scrapped last year when the Japanese Diet formally scrapped the "self-ban" on military arms sales. The E-2Cs , the E-2Ds and the Boeing E-767 --- will provide operational MDA coverage, while we develop our own AWAC system -- no doubt it will be built on, upgraded, on the Kawasaki P-1 platform. I suspect within the decade.

Why does Japan make itself more dependent on the US in this field, when you have an own platform and the capability to develop an own radar system?

The "self ban" on military arms sales and military R&D had been a barrier for decades. It has recently been scrapped -- and we are trying to catch up -- in earnest.
 
Back
Top Bottom