What's new

Manohar Parrikar mulling new policy for defence lobbying

anant_s

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
5,600
Reaction score
92
Country
India
Location
India
Manohar Parrikar mulling new policy for defence lobbying

manohar.jpg

PANAJI: Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar is considering the introduction of a new policy on the vexed issue of blacklisting defence equipment suppliers accused of corruption as well as reforming rules for lobbyists to balance the needs of the armed forces with transparency.
Speaking to ET in the state capital at the chief minister's residence, Parrikar said, "One of the ideas the government is thinking about is how to ensure transparency in dealing with representatives of defence companies and also the policy of blacklisting those companies."

Parrikar, who has been briefed on these issues by top officials after taking charge, said a fair amount of documentation was ready as his predecessor Arun Jaitley had initiated changes in these areas.
Parrikar was in Goa to ensure a smooth transfer in the coastal state of which he was the CM before being moved to the Centre as the defence minister in the November 9 Union Cabinet expansion. "There are things about administration which only a chief minister knows. Some files are only with the CM or just about one bureaucrat. So I had to brief him (new CM Lax-mikant Parsekar) on key matters. I had only two days to decide on Modiji's suggestion about becoming the defence minister," he said.
Elaborating on the complications and grey areas in dealing with the issue of lobbying, Parrikar said some aspect of lobbying could be allowed.
"Lobbying fee needs to be clearly defined. The activity, till it pertains to transparent representation of defence companies' products and other things, can be regulated and allowed. Actually, I would prefer the word 'representation' and not 'lobbying'. After all, if these companies have to sell equipment here, they or their representatives will need an office from where they work, and provide data and information which is reliable for us to make informed decisions."
He also emphasised that he was "thinking aloud" on the matter and these thoughts should not be taken as final opinion. Soon after coming to power, the Modi government had begun reviewing UPA-II regime's policy of so-called 'blanket blacklisting' of defence equipment suppliers under which commercial dealings with vendors facing corruption inquiries were prohibited.
In late August, Jaitley had announced a modification of this policy to ensure supply of spares for equipment already purchased by the forces. He had also cited the need to balance concerns of transparency with the requirements of the armed forces, as the pace of defence procurement had slowed in the past 2-3 years following allegations of kickbacks and corruption during UPA years. This has further delayed modernisation and upgradation of security forces.

"If you (do blanket) blacklisting of defence companies, they will blackmail you, since a lot of equipment has already been purchased and requires spares for maintenance. Also, to give just one example of the fighter jets, there are not many manufacturers around. So if we blacklist half of them, our buying options are curtailed. As it is, there will be some among them who won't sell (to) us for strategic reasons, like the Chinese, for example. So, it needs to be decided clearly about blacklisting for what period and which product from a company, since the companies sell different products in different countries."

For his part, Parrikar appears to have brought in a sense of urgency in the ministry on this front, as the three service chiefs have been asked to prioritise their demands and prepare for the meeting of the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), a structure under the defence minister to deal with acquisitions. It consists of the defence minister, the chiefs of the Army, Air Force and Navy, the minister of state and the defence secretary.


Manohar Parrikar mulling new policy for defence lobbying - The Economic Times
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Although too early to say, but it looks like some common sense is prevailing. Blind black listing was hurting armed forces more than anyone. Hope a clearer policy emerges, giving a wide and level playing ground for defence contractors and at the same time keep the country's interests safe.
@sancho @Abingdonboy @sudhir007 @kurup @nair
 
Last edited:
.
I like this man...when I was in Goa this year dad did tell me about the first IIT chief minister of India. Lol
He is supposed to be very competent, very decisive and also known as a person of high integrity, with a very impressive track record as a performing administrator.So our defence ministry is in safe hands.
The biggest mistake of AK Antony was being too cautious to stall rather than risk a scandal. This strategy drastically hit defence modernisation plans.In fact many of the defence procurement deals 've been marred by controversies only due to involvement of middlemen....Chopper scam of 2013-augustawestland,scorpene submarine deal...etc etc.
I hope he gives our armed a boost which they lacked till now.
 
.
I like this man...when I was in Goa this year dad did tell me about the first IIT chief minister of India. Lol
He is supposed to be very competent, very decisive and also known as a person of high integrity, with a very impressive track record as a performing administrator

More than his qualifications, i think his image as an able and clean administrator is what is required right now. I wish him all the luck.

So our DM is in safe hands.
:tup: AMEN!

The biggest mistake of AK Antony was being too cautious to stall rather than risk a scandal. This strategy drastically hit defence modernisation plans.In fact many of the defence procurement deals have been marred by controversies only due to involvement of middlemen....Chopper scam of 2013-augustawestland,scorpene submarine deal...etc etc.
I hope he gives our armed a boost which they lacked till now.

Yes that exactly was the policy paralysis that took its toll on virtually every aspect of governance. Therefore the fact that this government is thinking pragmatically and out of the box is really heartening.
 
. .
Manohar Parrikar mulling new policy for defence lobbying

View attachment 152944
PANAJI: Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar is considering the introduction of a new policy on the vexed issue of blacklisting defence equipment suppliers accused of corruption as well as reforming rules for lobbyists to balance the needs of the armed forces with transparency.
Speaking to ET in the state capital at the chief minister's residence, Parrikar said, "One of the ideas the government is thinking about is how to ensure transparency in dealing with representatives of defence companies and also the policy of blacklisting those companies."

Parrikar, who has been briefed on these issues by top officials after taking charge, said a fair amount of documentation was ready as his predecessor Arun Jaitley had initiated changes in these areas.
Parrikar was in Goa to ensure a smooth transfer in the coastal state of which he was the CM before being moved to the Centre as the defence minister in the November 9 Union Cabinet expansion. "There are things about administration which only a chief minister knows. Some files are only with the CM or just about one bureaucrat. So I had to brief him (new CM Lax-mikant Parsekar) on key matters. I had only two days to decide on Modiji's suggestion about becoming the defence minister," he said.
Elaborating on the complications and grey areas in dealing with the issue of lobbying, Parrikar said some aspect of lobbying could be allowed.
"Lobbying fee needs to be clearly defined. The activity, till it pertains to transparent representation of defence companies' products and other things, can be regulated and allowed. Actually, I would prefer the word 'representation' and not 'lobbying'. After all, if these companies have to sell equipment here, they or their representatives will need an office from where they work, and provide data and information which is reliable for us to make informed decisions."
He also emphasised that he was "thinking aloud" on the matter and these thoughts should not be taken as final opinion. Soon after coming to power, the Modi government had begun reviewing UPA-II regime's policy of so-called 'blanket blacklisting' of defence equipment suppliers under which commercial dealings with vendors facing corruption inquiries were prohibited.
In late August, Jaitley had announced a modification of this policy to ensure supply of spares for equipment already purchased by the forces. He had also cited the need to balance concerns of transparency with the requirements of the armed forces, as the pace of defence procurement had slowed in the past 2-3 years following allegations of kickbacks and corruption during UPA years. This has further delayed modernisation and upgradation of security forces.

"If you (do blanket) blacklisting of defence companies, they will blackmail you, since a lot of equipment has already been purchased and requires spares for maintenance. Also, to give just one example of the fighter jets, there are not many manufacturers around. So if we blacklist half of them, our buying options are curtailed. As it is, there will be some among them who won't sell (to) us for strategic reasons, like the Chinese, for example. So, it needs to be decided clearly about blacklisting for what period and which product from a company, since the companies sell different products in different countries."

For his part, Parrikar appears to have brought in a sense of urgency in the ministry on this front, as the three service chiefs have been asked to prioritise their demands and prepare for the meeting of the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), a structure under the defence minister to deal with acquisitions. It consists of the defence minister, the chiefs of the Army, Air Force and Navy, the minister of state and the defence secretary.


Manohar Parrikar mulling new policy for defence lobbying - The Economic Times
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Although too early to say, but it looks like some common sense is prevailing. Blind black listing was hurting armed forces more than anyone. Hope a clearer policy emerges, giving a wide and level playing ground for defence contractors and at the same time keep the country's interests safe.
@sancho @Abingdonboy @sudhir007 @kurup @nair

"
Interestingly, this is not the first time a BJP government has associated with a think-tank with links to the RSS. In Goa, BJP Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar, who heads a BJP government, announced his government's plans to appoint Forum for Integrated National Security (FINS) to operate a defence studies academy.

As reported by Firstpost earlier, Parrrikar had said: "Sometimes you wonder whether we seriously understand our security problem. Shortly, I am announcing the setting up of an academy which FINS can operate," during the state's budget session in February this year. "The state government will set it up. It can be a college of security or school or whatever word you want to use," he had said.

FINS, an RSS-backed defence organisation, has the organisation's idealogue Indresh Kumar as its chief patron. Interestingly, when Parrikar made the announcement, former home secretary RK Singh and former Intelligence Bureau secretary Ajit Doval were present. Singh is now a BJP MP from Arrah, while Doval is the NSA.


From Vivekananda to PMO stars: Meet Modi's favourite think tank - Firstpost

Looks like it was pre planned from March of this year ?
 
.
Blind black listing was hurting armed forces more than anyone.

We have seen a change of policy wrt blacklisting under Arun Jaitley, so that's good but not something new. The problem is, that blacklisting no matter if blanket or partial is only a result of a problem and we have to tackle the problem itself not the result!
Why do we have no howitzer deals for a decade? Not because all companies was blacklisted, but because of corruption and bribery cases within IA.
Why didn't we got LUH even last year? Because IA wanted to investigate one of their officers for corruption and bribery issues.
So we have to keep our house in check first and with a much stronger aim to hold wrong doing accountable, besides to get more sense in blacklisting procedure.
 
.
We have seen a change of policy wrt blacklisting under Arun Jaitley, so that's good but not something new. The problem is, that blacklisting no matter if blanket or partial is only a result of a problem and we have to tackle the problem itself not the result!

Arun jaitley is a corrupt thug, russian prostitute licker. He saved Chidambaram in fairgrowth case, he was Chidambaram's lawyer. (Case was put on Chidambaram by Swamy). Also, Chidambaram is a huge crook, a member of Das tradition(Rothschild's membership society in India). He fought in support of Dow Chemicals in Bhopal Genocide case.

One more secret - Jaitley and Chidambaram enjoy russian prostitutes jointly. ;) (just google it. The people who exposed Abhis3x Manu Singhvi's oral-s3x video in public, has also threatened to put Chidambaram+Jaitley's prostitute videos on internet)

Why do we have no howitzer deals for a decade? Not because all companies was blacklisted, but because of corruption and bribery cases within IA.
Why didn't we got LUH even last year? Because IA wanted to investigate one of their officers for corruption and bribery issues.

Those imports are not needed. Focus on home-made.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom