What's new

Malaysian Defence Minister Taunts LCA Tejas as a Test Subject.!!

Yes, the JF-17 was out early…
So it was worse than a ”Test Subject”.
If you want to troll then don't be ashamed to hide your real identity.
Malaysia requested Pakistan to send two JF-17s for evaluation but Pakistan refrained. The headline in the link you posted was gloating, Tejas in, JF-17 out. Guess which one gets labelled Testbed. During 90s PAF evaluated the Grippen but rejected it... What does that tell you.

FB_IMG_1679578041935.jpg
 
.
Ignore trolls, they've gotta do what they need to make themselves feel better given their nation's piss poor pathetic state and hopeless outlook.
Losers like you have no issues using a Pakistani forum on daily basis to gloat that India has managed to put a nut on a bolt. But being what you are your habitual barking is never far away.
 
.
Does not surprise me when I see the USA has a sort of beef with around 80% of the world. Big power's problem.
And yes, China clearly needs ''democracy'' .... ahmm.... I mean the ''USA sort of democracy''. So when are you sending your warships to overtake China?
Dude. The US has 750 US foreign military bases in over 85 countries arounfd the world and will increase more with time i suppose(Phillipines is calling them back already. Lol). The 2nd country after the US is U.K (and even so we are far behind the U.S
with the UK having just about 145 military bases/facilities in just over 40 countries), followed by Russia, other countries are even further behind.


So if US had beef with so many countries then how come many countries around the globe welcome US forces/presence to set up military facilities and bases against other external threats? Lol even in China's neighbourhood, almost all China's maritime neighbours has US military bases/presence or are close US allies. Lol The hell, even your country Pakistan has US military bases until a couple years ago despite Pakistan being a so called Chinese close partner.lol Plus not even counting countries who are US ally but without military bases yet.

Very difficult for China to change things to be honest.. They will need a very different foriegn policy to change thibgs. So far their strategy doesn't seem to have worked much to be honest. 😁
 
Last edited:
.
If you want to troll then don't be ashamed to hide your real identity.
Malaysia requested Pakistan to send two JF-17s for evaluation but Pakistan refrained. The headline in the link you posted was gloating, Tejas in, JF-17 out. Guess which one gets labelled Testbed. During 90s PAF evaluated the Grippen but rejected it... What does that tell you.

View attachment 921656
The normal phrase used is ”Sour Grapes”.
This has been debated multiple times on PDF.

Musharraf was on a state visit to Sweden, and expressed an interest in Gripen, and was told it was ”out of the question”. Pakistan was allowed to buy EriEyes.

1679594558208.png
 
.
The normal phrase used is ”Sour Grapes”.
This has been debated multiple times on PDF.

Musharraf was on a state visit to Sweden, and expressed an interest in Gripen, and was told it was ”out of the question”. Pakistan was allowed to buy EriEyes.

View attachment 921723
The term thick as a brick ampty applies here.... You think PAF pilot, Shahid Lateef, who incidentally landed with first F-16 in Pakistan is posing for a photo shoot. And I knew you were an Indian hiding behind that ID.
 
. . . . . . . . .
The term thick as a brick ampty applies here.... You think PAF pilot, Shahid Lateef, who incidentally landed with first F-16 in Pakistan is posing for a photo shoot. And I knew you were an Indian hiding behind that ID.
Anyone can provide a fake picture.
Look at the lighting in the face. Light coming from the left.
And then look at the shadows of the aircraft, light coming from the right.
The age of the pilot seems wrong. the photo looks like it was taken during the 1980s, not late 1990s.

How much time did you spend in Photoshop (which was a total waste of time…)?

So I doubt You can show a real link claiming Pakistan evaluated the Gripen, when you have to use photoshopped pictures…

Accusing someone to be Indian seems to be the escape route when arguments are lacking.

Funny that neither the Swedish Government nor SAAB is aware of any evaluation.


Information about Pakistani purchase of Gripen is rejected
Published 2004-06-21
In the Pakistani media there is detailed information about an impending purchase of the Gripen combat aircraft. But the information is categorically rejected from the Swedish side.

Pakistan is about to buy 40 Jas Gripen planes from Sweden according to centrally located defense sources in Pakistan, according to the online edition of The News, an English-language Pakistani newspaper. The purchase will be discussed when Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf visits Sweden in July. According to the private Pakistani television station Geo TV, Sweden promised to sell Gripenplan to Pakistan during the visit of Riaz Khokhar, second in command at Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to Sweden a month ago, states Indian Newindpress.com.

Pakistan's air force is in dire need of high-tech aircraft to compete with neighboring India but has been unable to purchase US F-16 planes as both the Bush and Clinton administrations have denied such a deal. Therefore, interest has now been directed towards Sweden.

The details in foreign media, and which are referenced by Sydsvenska Dagbladet, are numerous regarding the aircraft and the planned purchase but are rejected in Sweden.

- The Minister of Defense has not held any talks with Pakistan about selling Gripen, says Magnus Edin who is press secretary to Minister of Defense Leni Björklund to TT.

A country that is interested in buying the Gripenplane can go directly to Gripen International, which is the Swedish-English company that manages the marketing and sales of the Gripenplane for Saab. But a potential buyer can also go to the government. In the latter case, it will be the Defense Materiel Administration (FMV) that manages the business if the government decides on a sale. But FMV has not received any such assignment, says Ulf Lindström who is press officer at FMV.

In order for the Gripenplan to be sold abroad, the Swedish government must give its approval and it is Prime Minister Gunnar Lund who has to test the possibility of an export permit. But according to his press secretary Anette Törnqvist, there is no request regarding Pakistan.

According to Saab's press manager Peter Larsson, it is only Brazil with which there is an ongoing procurement process, while South Africa, Hungary and the Czech Republic are counted as completed.

The marketing of the Gripen plane takes place at various air or defense exhibitions around the world, and Peter Larsson says that there is certainly an interest from Pakistani authorities in the Gripen plane, just as there is from a number of other countries. There may have been questions from Pakistan at the shows. But it is by no means certain that a demonstrated interest will lead to any deal or procurement.

- It is very far down the scale compared to an imminent deal, says Peter Larsson to TT.

BIRGITTA SENNERDAL/TT
 
Last edited:
.
Dude. The US has 750 US foreign military bases in over 85 countries arounfd the world and will increase more with time i suppose(Phillipines is calling them back already. Lol). The 2nd country after the US is U.K (and even so we are far behind the U.S
with the UK having just about 145 military bases/facilities in just over 40 countries), followed by Russia, other countries are even further behind.


So if US had beef with so many countries then how come many countries around the globe welcome US forces/presence to set up military facilities and bases against other external threats? Lol even in China's neighbourhood, almost all China's maritime neighbours has US military bases/presence or are close US allies. Lol The hell, even your country Pakistan has US military bases until a couple years ago despite Pakistan being a so called Chinese close partner.lol Plus not even counting countries who are US ally but without military bases yet.

Very difficult for China to change things to be honest.. They will need a very different foriegn policy to change thibgs. So far their strategy doesn't seem to have worked much to be honest. 😁
Whats China strategy? China strategy is the same for 5000years. Keep its DNA/culture in tact and work harder than others and mind own business and its obviously working very well since China is living rent free in Anglos heads everyday lol

what is US/UK strategy? Replace its population with black/asian/latinos in 20 yrs time and then go into civil war? Meanwhile trying to reduce its economy/impact on the world every day? I guess you are doing very good meeting that strategy since Whiteys are going to be replaced with browns/blacks whose number one enemy is whites :yahoo:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom