What's new

Making accusations is our job, govt needs to prove us wrong: Imran

Thank you for taking bait. Now let is talk about disbanded accountability team of your political party in response to the investigation of alleged corruptions on all accounts. :D
The nab which sent me say no to corruption message should do its work you have the govt and institutions use them
Oh wait thats just political point scoring :D
You got nothing you dropped to the low of saying corruption is okay as long as we have baboon leagis in the parliament
 
.
Absolutely unnecessary statement but then he's IK. There's no denying of the fact that it is/was the job of the government to probe into the scam surfaced through ICIJ.

Imran Khan fathered daughter out of wedlock. Onus is on Imran Khan aka accused party to prove his innocent in the front of the world and that includes DNA test judging by your mindset.

If proven, Imran Khan is disqualified from the contesting as the democratic leader of Pakistan. It will be fun. :D
 
.
Imran Khan fathered daughter out of wedlock. Onus is on Imran Khan aka accused party to prove his innocent in the front of the world and that includes DNA test judging by your mindset.

If proven, Imran Khan is disqualified from the contesting as the democratic leader of Pakistan. It will be fun. :D

I don't defend leaders please knock at the correct doors.... Thank you!
 
.
Imran Khan fathered daughter out of wedlock. Onus is on Imran Khan aka accused party to prove his innocent in the front of the world and that includes DNA test judging by your mindset.

If proven, Imran Khan is disqualified from the contesting as the democratic leader of Pakistan. It will be fun. :D
You are equating towards an alleged incident outside of Pakistan to a corruption scandal that made Sharif a billionaire of looted cash?
Really?
 
.
The nab which sent me say no to corruption message should do its work you have the govt and institutions use them
Oh wait thats just political point scoring :D
You got nothing you dropped to the low of saying corruption is okay as long as we have baboon leagis in the parliament

I am agreeing with you. Now let's talk about the disbanded investigation team that is subjected to internally investigate the alleged corruption in your political party. What happened to that?

Failure to response will invalide your entire theme that is riding on so-called morality as in anti-corruption. So what happpened to the theme of anti-corruption that had disbanded the investigation team for the purpose of internally analysis of the alleged corruption in your political party?

P.S: Corruption stance was put on purpose. It is called bait for a reason. :D
 
. .
Imran Khan fathered daughter out of wedlock. Onus is on Imran Khan aka accused party to prove his innocent in the front of the world and that includes DNA test judging by your mindset.

If proven, Imran Khan is disqualified from the contesting as the democratic leader of Pakistan. It will be fun. :D
Playboy Imran 62,63 pe poora nahiin utarta. Jhoota insaan.
 
.
As the opposition our job is to make accusations and it is up to the government to prove us wrong, said Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf chairman Imran Khan on Wednesday.:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

“We bagged more than 80 million votes and it is our duty to make accusations whenever public money is stolen,” he added.

He made these remarks during the first hearing of the Panamagate case after a new bench was constituted.

During the hearing, the Supreme Court barred the government and the PTI from holding media talks on the Panamagate case on the court premises.

Although both sides agreed to abide by the court’s directions, party leaders and officials spoke to the press right after the case’s first hearing with the new bench — some on the premises of the court while others were held at a slight distance.

Court orders

During the hearing, Justice Asif Saeed Khosa said: “We have issued directives that there will be no press talks on the premises of the Supreme Court.”

He added that they did not want to impose any restrictions but people should respect and honour the apex court’s premises.

Justice Khosa assured journalists that the apex court did not want to impose any legal or constitutional embargo on press conferences. He said “discuss court proceedings in the media but don’t base them on observations and queries of judges by taking their names and flashing their photographs in the media.”

He explained that judges of the apex court had raised questions from different angles to extract maximum information and this did not mean that they had accepted the point of view of any party.

Justice Khosa added that “there will be no value of this institution if it has no respect”.
The PTI chairman said that his party leaders would obey the instructions of the apex court, adding that they were forced to hold press conferences to negate the government’s “propaganda”.

PTI lawyer Naeem Bokhari assured the court that he would follow the apex court’s instructions. “Since the hearing of the Panamagate case started I have refused to appear in the media,” he said.

Awami Muslim League (AML) president Sheikh Rashid Ahmed intervened and said the Panamagate case was a historic case and millions of people wanted to see their leaders live on television every day.

Responding to this, Justice Khosa said: “You may indulge in runaway imagination but don’t drag the judges into it.”

Another judge of the apex court, Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan, said that observations of the judges’ were always tentative in nature. “Do not present these observations as sweeping statements,” he said.

Justice Khosa said: “Do not make judges’ observations subject matter in your TV shows and discussions. Judges do not get influenced.”

Shahid Hamid, lawyer for Prime Minister Nawaz Shairf’s daughter Maryam Nawaz, said that it had been decided in the rigging case that no press conferences would be held inside the premises of the Supreme Court. Talking to the media after the hearing, Information Minister Marriyum Aurangzeb said the PTI chief admitted before the apex court that he had no evidence against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his family in the Panama Papers case.
“Now the nation can understand that what kind of politics is being done by the PTI and its leaders,” she said.

The minister for capital administration development division, Tariq Fazal Chaudhry, held a press conference within the apex court’s premises and said that the PML-N had confidence in its leadership.

PML-N leader Talal Chaudhry said the PTI had failed to prove that Maryam Nawaz was a dependant of the prime minister. “She married in 1992 and since then she has been dependent on her husband,” he added.

PTI Vice Chairman Shah Mehmood Qureshi said his party would come up with more evidence to challenge the authenticity of a letter from Qatar’s former Prime Minister Hamad Bin Jassim Bin Jaber Al-Thani presented by the government to prove the prime minister’s innocence.
PTI spokesman Fawwad Chaudhry claimed the government had lost the Panamagate case in the Supreme Court.

“Now the PML-N should start searching for a new prime minister instead of changing their lawyer,” he said.

Standing close to the apex court’s stairs, AML President Sheikh Rashid said that he had full confidence in the judiciary. “Political coffins will be taken out of here [Supreme Court].”
Mr Qureshi, in an interview on a talk show said, that despite the court’s directives to political parties and media, Mr Chaudhry should have restrained himself from passing such remarks.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1306543/making-accusations-is-our-job-govt-needs-to-prove-us-wrong-imran
We have someone who talks just like him... his name is Arvind Kejriwal... both are a big Shit and Run buddies.
 
.
I don't defend leaders please knock at the correct doors.... Thank you!

But you do defend the idea of the definition of laws that is opposite to realistic justice system.

And how do you know they are correct door? Surely the accused party [correct door] should be able to prove first that they are correct doors before we engage in the personal gimmick. :D
 
.
am agreeing with you.
Move the authorities to do something no one is stopping the govt
P.S: Corruption stance was put on purpose. It is called bait for a reason.
Nope thats a hackey argument who from those who like nawaz just because he hates army i see it daily
Failure to response will invalide your entire theme that is riding on so-called morality as in anti-corruption. So what happpened to the theme of anti-corruption that had disbanded the investigation team for the purpose of internally analysis of the alleged corruption in your political party?
If you think someone is corrupt you move the authorities against them i am not against it at all i think all corruption charges including Asghar khan case should be investigated :D
 
.
You are equating towards an alleged incident outside of Pakistan to a corruption scandal that made Sharif a billionaire of looted cash?
Really?

So you are acknowledging the internal corruption that is happening in your political party? :D

Move the authorities to do something no one is stopping the govt

Nope thats a hackey argument who from those who like nawaz just because he hates army i see it daily

If you think someone is corrupt you move the authorities against them i am not against it at all i think all corruption charges including Asghar khan case should be investigated :D

But why the accountability team of your was disbanded from the investigation to the alleged corruption in your political party? You are not fooling anyone here. Answer to the question. :D
 
.
So you are acknowledging the internal corruption that is happening in your political party? :D
Nope i am saying is if you think something happened do an investigations i am not screaming martial law a jaye ga :D

Answer to the question. :D
Think something happened contact nab and tell them to investigate you have the power do it you knoe you got nothing on them you are using hackey arguments to defend the baboon :D
 
.
Nope i am saying is if you think something happened do an investigations i am not screaming martial law a jaye ga :D

Aren't you screaming Marshal Law or your Imran Khan for that matter given what he did in 2014 that almost brought Marshall Law to the table aborted due to power-sharing agreement between Nawaz and Raheel Sharifs?

That being said, why the accountabilty team is disbanded from the investigation to the alleged corruption in your political party? After all, you pride yourself or your political party as anti-corruption. :D
 
.
But you do defend the idea of the definition of laws which i just presented earlier.

And how do you know they are correct door? Surely the accused party [correct door] should be able to prove first that they are correct doors before we engage in the personal gimmick. :D

Maybe you should reread my post. USA shares border with the country you dwell in, just go and grab the judgement and file your case in Pakistan. You won't find a single post of mine deviating my principle stance on law.
 
.
Think something happened contact nab and tell them to investigate you have the power do it you knoe you got nothing on them you are using hackey arguments to defend the baboon :D

Thank you for the answer. I am sure most people who are reading this thread will be able to make best judge of your post. It was fun it lasted. :D
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom