What's new

Major Indian hsitory Myth: 1000 Years of Muslim Rule

Okay so hindutvas can't have it both ways.

If India is an ancient country, then you can't deny the 1000 years of Muslim rule.

If Muslims only ruled some parts and not others, then you can't say India was ever a country.

All rulers of 1000 years should come in next independence parade in delhi .indian people are desperate to salaam them .
 
. .
All rulers of 1000 years should come in next independence parade in delhi .indian people are desperate to salaam them .

This sounds like a trap.... You sure you are not just trying to reach you rape quota for the month by getting people to come to you?
 
. . .
Okay so hindutvas can't have it both ways.

If India is an ancient country, then you can't deny the 1000 years of Muslim rule.

If Muslims only ruled some parts and not others, then you can't say India was ever a country.
I don't follow what you are saying. Even if India was never a country, the areas cotermonious to it are ancient. I was simply providing evidence against the wrong claim that modern day India was ruled by Muslims for 1000 years, when Muslim invaders did not even come close to conquering all of the modern day ROI, let alone for 1000 years.

It is you who want to have it both ways. When you claim IVC- India and Pak are different
When talking about Muslim invasion-all of South Asia is India , and Muslims ruled India for 1000 years, even though the only part of India ruled that long is modern day Pakistan
@Indus Pakistan

Indians hindus and their indoctrain history
What I gave is actual history supported by evidence. It would be nice if Pakistani Muslims would know actual history.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom