Talwar e Pakistan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014
- Messages
- 6,525
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Punjabis make up around 2.8% of India, while they make up around 50% of Pakistan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Punjabis make up around 2.8% of India, while they make up around 50% of Pakistan.
Like @ranadd said - with this 50% - which war you WON?Punjabis make up around 2.8% of India, while they make up around 50% of Pakistan.
Bloody stalemates, just read some of the articles by Col Ajai Shukla, according to Mr Shukla the notion of India winning is laughable, he gives his reasons, do read up.Which is the one you think you won?
Bloody stalemates, just read some of the articles by Col Ajai Shukla, according to Mr Shukla the notion of India winning is laughable, he gives his reasons, do read up.
HAHAHAHAHAHA verified neutral sources, I stopped reading when you stated 90k POW, you fool that number includes civilians, their families, bureaucrats etc and we took 40% of Kashmir despite our army not getting involved till much later, a land you claim right upto GB yet I see no Bharati flags their only Pak flags, shame on you, our position is their should be a plebiscite whilst your Lok Sabha stated even GB is as much India as Delhi is come and take your supposed land you damn cowards, a nation with a fraction of your population and multiple times smaller land mass has got you tied down for decades.47, Pakistan wanted J&K. Got 1/3rd of it. 70 years still the same. Guess that's stalemate for India and victory for Pak.
71, Pakistan split into two. 90k POW. This is through and through Bangaldeshi victory for Pak. India has nothing to do with this as well.
Numbers do not lie. All these accounts are from verified neutral sources.
Actually the notion of Pak ever winning a war is down right ridiculous. They don't have the means or money to back the fight. Each time, they cry and go to daddy.
HAHAHAHAHAHA verified neutral sources, I stopped reading when you stated 90k POW, you fool that number includes civilians, their families, bureaucrats etc and we took 40% of Kashmir despite our army not getting involved till much later, a land you claim right upto GB yet I see no Bharati flags their only Pak flags, shame on you, our position is their should be a plebiscite whilst your Lok Sabha stated even GB is as much India as Delhi is come and take your supposed land you damn cowards, a nation with a fraction of your population and multiple times smaller land mass has got you tied down for decades.
Hmm because of your very uninformed comments,,,,,, now my ignore list button.Why did you stop?
but this seems a main plausible reason.. tell me size doesn't matter.. @padamchen
View attachment 426790
How is this statement connected to the topic ?Punjabis make up around 2.8% of India, while they make up around 50% of Pakistan.
Sure man as Oscar goes to your generals who celebrate 65 and 'Surgical Strikes' so skilfully...Never produced a decent military leader in your entire history.
you failed to draw parallel. I posted the pic for some other reason..The frail guy is revered all over the world. The tall guy included.
why not? "V.Batra (IA account) charged the enemy head on ..."
Don't know about him but if you are saying he was from Indian army then the whole argument is settled.
Argument started with someone saying, Indian officers lack 'bravado' (blood-rush etc etc) to charge against their enemies whereas Pakistan officers has that.....
New Recruit
Only ones who got beaten are your ancestors who surrendered and converted.yes, its not.. but physical fitness gives you stamina and confidence. Actually, its the blood rush which makes you charge the enemy lines..
Indians were beaten mostly by invaders as they were physically weak due to non high protein diet.
however, courage and will to sacrifice are different
New Recruit