What's new

Major Gaurav Arya With Gentlemen Cadet At IMA | Patriot

.
it depends... like cavalry should have athletic/petite person as they have to fit in armoured vehicles.. plus they should be skilful.
Infantry role is different. Where you need physical strength and stamina to carry load, stress and bayonet charge may be...
sniper needs skill and endurance..
Plus you have to train/acclimatize your troops of various branch. Like for Thar, Siachen, Forest etc.. So that belongs to mental strength and your body abilities to adapt. that's different
You are telling me what I told you, I gave you the General idea of how it is when it comes to army, where size is not a matter of concern. Although there is a minimum qualification.

And that was answer to your original argument when comparing Gandhi to a tall and seemingly fit guy.
 
.
@DESERT FIGHTER @Arsalan @The Sandman Let us compare these kids with our Gentlemen Cadets.
Even our Platoon commanders are looking more graceful compared to Indian officers.
No comparison.
5150.jpg
My brother might be going there this year.. :)

Hes been a gold medalist throughout his student and army life.

Gold Medal,UET/NUST.
Served in Waziristan
Than course at US
Instructor at PA school of XYZ
Now hes up for PMA & Staff course.
 
.
You are telling me what I told you, I gave you the General idea of how it is when it comes to army, where size is not a matter of concern. Although there is a minimum qualification.

And that was answer to your original argument when comparing Gandhi to a tall and seemingly fit guy.
ok.. chill man
 
.

Ok! NDA, you are awarded a graduate degree. B.Sc or BA. 3 years. Then for a one year course he is send to IMA if he is selected/opted for army, else navy or air force. While air force have a 1.5 year training before commissioning as 2nd Lt.

It's not 5 years.

ok.. chill man
lol! I'm not charged up :D
 
. .
Bro these chaps are feeble looking just like the pathetic major Gaurav Arya, i have taken on his fans in various social media forums (he has quite a following), the man is truly pathetic and viscerally anti Pakistan, perhaps even more so than the pathetic GD Bakshi who lost a brother to a Pakistani rocket attack in 65 war.Kudos Bro
 
. . .
A might be common sense
"
If you think you are a stronger, better and powerful race & you still lose all the wars you fought !!!!!! Then it's time to smell coffee and accept one of the two things.
1. You are not what you think you are
2. Somebody is way better than you ;)
 
.
yes, its not.. but physical fitness gives you stamina and confidence. Actually, its the blood rush which makes you charge the enemy lines..
Indians were beaten mostly by invaders as they were physically weak due to non high protein diet.
however, courage and will to sacrifice are different

Come out of the slumber mate....that was 19th century. Do you really need to charge at your enemy now?

I have not seen western armies charging in Iraq,Afghanistan.....and going by your logic of physical fitness Bangladeshi rebels in 1971 would be biting dust against your army....but you know the case
It's the age of strategy couple with technology....one who thinks better, overwhelms the opponent.....Look around you (around the globe) and think.. isn't that so??
 
.
Unfortunately looks cant help you win a war :D:D
It will be a matter of time.

Bro these chaps are feeble looking just like the pathetic major Gaurav Arya, i have taken on his fans in various social media forums (he has quite a following), the man is truly pathetic and viscerally anti Pakistan, perhaps even more so than the pathetic GD Bakshi who lost a brother to a Pakistani rocket attack in 65 war.Kudos Bro
This man Gurav Arya have political security provided by BJP to promote their agendas, i think this is the reason behind his popularity.
 
.
My 2 paise:
If muscle power and aggression helped win every war then Mongols and Afghans would have been the most powerful ppl in the world today.
At the least, they were once!!! As for Afgans, still they are making the life hell for the Pentagon boys!! And, they single handedly crushed the Red Army...
 
.
Come out of the slumber mate....that was 19th century. Do you really need to charge at your enemy now?

I have not seen western armies charging in Iraq,Afghanistan.....and going by your logic of physical fitness Bangladeshi rebels in 1971 would be biting dust against your army....but you know the case
It's the age of strategy couple with technology....one who thinks better, overwhelms the opponent.....Look around you (around the globe) and think.. isn't that so??
They already did... read a fukin book.
 
.
Indians were beaten mostly by invaders as they were physically weak due to non high protein diet.
however, courage and will to sacrifice are different

India had Indian rulers, but Pakistan was always ruled by invaders in last 2000 years
Only time when Pakistanis ruled Pakistan Lands comprehensively and stably happened after independence (1947)

High Protein diet Pakitanis were ruled by Indians/ Turks/ Europeans/ Afghans/ Iranians/ Huns/ Sikhs)
Timeline of rulers of Pakistani land
Mauryas, pre Ashoka (~300 BC , Ruler Origin : Bihar India)

Mauryas, Post Ashoka (~260 BC, Ruler Origin : Bihar India)

Indo/ Greek Kingdom (~150 BC, Ruler Origin : Central Asia)

Indo/ Scythians (~55 BC, Ruler Origin : Central Asia)

Kushans (~50-300 AD, Ruler Origin : Afgan/ Cuntral Asia)

Huns (~350 AD, Ruler Origin : Central Asia)

Guptas (~400 AD, Ruler Origin : Bihar India)

Huns (~500 AD, Ruler Origin : Central Asia

Gazanivids (~1000 AD,Ruler Origin : Turk)

Ghaurids (~1200 AD,Ruler Origin : Persian)

Delhi Sultanate(~1200-1450 AD, Ruler Origin : Turkic)

Moughls (~1500 AD, Ruler Origin : Central Asia)

Durrani and Sikh Empires (~1700 AD, Ruler Origin : Sikhs (India), Durranis (Afgans))

British (~1850 AD, Ruler Origin : Europeans)

Pakistanis ( After 1947 AD, Ruler Origin : Pakistani)

@padamchen here is the right response for such keyboard commandos
 
.
Back
Top Bottom