You can save your and as well as my time if you stop trolling the thread with irrelevant information and just stick to the topic, if there is any topic left here. You have always failed to refute the points I raised in previous posts, the most you could do is to reject the facts without any substantial proof. Although the whole post is full of usual rhetoric and rant, and there is hardly anything substantial that deserves a reply I still try to answer the least absurd comments.
Either you have never been abroad or you do not know what immigration means. Anybody who is granted immigration becomes a permanent resident of that country. A permanent resident is almost a citizen with some rights such as voting, passport & consular services not extended until he/she becomes a citizen which is usually only a matter of time after one becomes resident. But, you must have confused migration due to partition of a country to that of a general migration. Do not be fooled by the literal meaning of the word as both are vastly different acts. In this particular case, citizens of a country that breaks into parts are still citizens of that country and have the right to choose which part to live in. Nobody can take that away from them.
If a country is divided its citizens cannot decide on their own where they will live. There are some prerequisites they have to fulfill and they have to follow the laws of the respected countries. On the day of 15th August 1947 Pakistan and India emerged as a two sovereign states on the map of the world and the people automatically became the citizens of that country where they were residing at that moment. Both the countries were not legally bound to accept those refugees who were forced to leave their homes, they did it on moral ground. An agreement between India and Pakistan decided the fate of those who had taken refuge in Pak or India after the partition of British India, all of them were automatically neutralized and the 1951? Citizenship act of Pakistan deem them to be the citizens of Pakistan. A year later further amendment in that act put an end to the uncontrolled migration of Muslims from India and both the countries introduced visa and passport control in the same year.
As for the trampling of laws, it is our general experience that illegal immigrants, note the emphasis on the word illegal, from Afghanistan and Makran etc. and their offspring that sprout like bunnies because of low moral values and non existent family culture break more laws then the rest of the Pakistanis combined.
Why so much hate for Makranis? What have they done to you? You poor souls hate everybody as it is ingrained in your psyche. After fighting all other ethnic groups in Pakistan it seems that now the followers of Quaid e Fasad have found another enemy who will soon become the target of their trained snipers. Concern a psychologist before this hate devours you.
Makran is a legal part of Pakistan and the constitution guarantees its people the citizenship of Pakistan by birth. Try again
By the way I have noticed how somebody very conveniently sidestepped my wonder of his/her background
I am a bonafide Indus man. A humble, hard-working, loving and brave Indus man. I am a true inheritor of those great civilizations sprouted and flourished in the Indus river valley, Im an acute admirer of the beautiful landscape of this land of my ancestors who spilled their blood to defend this land from aggressors, I am an ardent follower of the teachings of our great sufi poets who spread the message of peace and brotherhood. All these thing are alien to you, so don't worry if you don't understand me.
Go and read my post, again. I had stated that we had ruled Bharat before English 'and' clearly gave reasons for our right to Pakistan post period. It is due to our struggle that Pakistan is a free country today, somewhat. Otherwise you would still be in some cave in Afghanistan or cleaning toilets under the British rule.
What happened? Few posts ago you were proudly claiming that you have always lived in the Indian Sub-continent and now immediately you have become the progeny of the Muslim rulers. You can also claim to be the king of China, who can stop you from doing so? Listen buddy, I know truth is bitter and for you guys it is hard to digest the fact that most probably you have converted to Islam from Hindusim - for whatever reason as it is your personal matter. Believe me, you have never ruled any thing even in your dreams. Those were Mughals and Afghans who ruled over India whereas you have always been a native to India. You are the conquered, not the conqueror.
In your post you tried to malign Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, you probably stopped just short of putting Quaid-e-Azam in the same league. This is actually proof of your nefarious motives against Pakistanis, against people who made the real difference for Pakistan.
Was Syed Ahmed Khan a Pakistani? Instead of wasting your time watching the clips of latest
kartabs of Altaf bhai you should read some books, and dont believe everything you read in mutala e Pakistsan. Syed Ahmed was a proud servant of the King, he did everything to prove his loyalty to the British master, he even severely criticized the so-called 1857 war of independence and considered it an act of treason (read The Murder of History by K. Aziz). Jinnah was a great Indus man, although I dont endorse everything he did but still I have a huge respect for him.
I do not know what you are quoting, 2 million lives lost may have been the count of people who lost their lives while trying to move to Pakistan. Out of context things are quoted only by those who have no proper grounds for arguments, these are the people who will jump left right and centre simply to take away focus from the prime note of argument....precisely what you have done here. I have no idea why this was brought up and I will not be dragged into arguments absent truth and honor.
I was quoting the 2nd best mayor of the universe who, in a political show, used the dirty language and bragged about the 20 lakh janoN ki qurbani his people offered for the creation of Pakistan. An estimated 200,000(Talbot) died during partition riots and the overwhelming majority of them were unfortunately Punjabis. Did you get my point now?