London fire vs. 9-11 fire

[BATMAN]

Fracture mechanics is the field of mechanics concerned with the study of the propagation of cracks in materials.

There can't possibly a fracture to WTC by aluminum/fiber airplane.
Propagation of any is beyond discussion. Its just your conspiracy for your followers.
There are also racists in west, who would like to believe in this BS without thinking for a moment.
BTW.. I never try to define mechanics, I can always google any field any time, and I'm sure wiki will have answer for me.
Rest all of your post doesn't prove anything or provide analytical argument, as to why WTC collapse, like sand castle and.
Until today, official US version is that it was building fire, which lead to collapse of WTC, but here you are with propagation of crack theory.
You are however welcome, to submit your thesis to US Trump.

 

[Penguin]

Keeping quite, is like doing injustice to the families of victims.
Presenting comparable examples, helps to educate the non tech. people.
Its about time, real culprits and there associates are served justice.

The compare fire to fire, and leave out all the other stuff. The real culprits and there associates are known and have been served justice. Just because there is a highrise fire in UK is not a good enough reason to start the debate all over again.

 

[BATMAN]

The compare fire to fire, and leave out all the other stuff. The real culprits and there associates are known and have been served justice. Just because there is a highrise fire in UK is not a good enough reason to start the debate all over again.

That's the problem... case is not closed, on every 9-11 CNN / NBC / FOX runs documentaries blaming Pakistan.
Kerry Lugar bill has declared Pakistan as a nation of terrorists... its our duty to use our intellect to wash out those allegations from US govt. and expose the TRUE culprits, so they may be served justice.

There are real technicalities involved in believing that nose and wings of an air plane can truly slice through the WTC's iron wall, instead of falling off.

 

[Penguin]

That's the problem... case is not closed, on every 9-11 CNN / NBC / FOX runs documentaries blaming Pakistan.
Kerry Lugar bill has declared Pakistan as a nation of terrorists... its our duty to use our intellect to wash out those allegations from US govt. and expose the TRUE culprits, so they may be served justice.

There are real technicalities involved in believing that nose and wings of an air plane can truly slice through the WTC's iron wall, instead of falling off.

I've never herd anyone blame Pakistan for 9/11. Suchs BS.

You need to keep in mind that what US politicians and commentators say is a) for internal consumption (i.e. for THE dumbasses in THE backward states) and b) entertainment (how to achieve newsworthiness?)

By the way, were where you on 9/11?

 

[BATMAN]

By the way, were where you on 9/11?

I was in Saudi, sitting in my office!

Where were you on 9-11?

 

[Cthulhu]

There can't possibly a fracture to WTC by aluminum/fiber airplane.

It can actually, How it is possible goes under "Mechanics of Impact".

Propagation of any is beyond discussion. Its just your conspiracy for your followers.
There are also racists in west, who would like to believe in this BS without thinking for a moment, but this is not the main point.
BTW.. I never try to define mechanics, I can always google any field any time, and I'm sure wiki will have answer for me.
Rest all of your post doesn't prove anything or provide analytical argument, as to why WTC collapse, like sand castle.

Look, you don't have any knowledge of how and why a material fails under a given condition, Understanding this requires some basic knowledge like Statics, Mechanistic of Material, Mechanistic of Fracture, Materials Science, and Mechanistic of Impact (in this particular case), Wikipedia can't give enough knowledge regarding these subjects. If you had any knowledge regarding these subjects you'd know how WTC towers collapses under that condition.

Until today, official US version is that it was building fire, which lead to collapse of WTC, but here you are with propagation of crack theory.

This statements is true, among many factors, the main factor that caused the collapse of buildings was fire, meaning if there wasn't any fire the towers probably (but not necessarily) wouldn't collapse. And also you are wrong when you compare these two fires, the airplane fuel burns in much much higher degree.

 

[BATMAN]

And also you are wrong when you compare these two fires, the airplane fuel burns in much much higher degree.

You may be convincing with your 'mechanics of impact' but i can guarantee all mass of airplane and its fuel would not enter the WTC. Fuel would burn instantly in open air, can't possibly pulverize the core of WTC, in way of controlled demolition.

 

[Penguin]

I was in Saudi, sitting in my office!

Where were you on 9-11?

Outside, on 19th street in DC, a stonethrow away from the White House. I walked passed the burning Pentagon on my way home.

 

[Cthulhu]

Unlike you, my point of view is based on science.

You may be convincing with your 'mechanics of impact' but i can guarantee all mass of airplane and its fuel would not enter the WTC.

If you can scientifically explain to my how water cuts through the steel in these videos, Then i will gladly explain to you how an airplane made of fiber glass and aluminum could cut through steel and enter the WTC tower.

Fuel would burn instantly in open air, can't possibly pulverize the core of WTC, in way of controlled demolition.

If you can explain to me the difference between Ferrite, Austenite and Cementite, Then i will gladly explain to you how fuel doesn't need to pulverize the core of WTC.

 

[NakedLunch]

The story of 9-11 is best told from the perspective of Building 7 and Benjamin Netanyahoooo's friend Larry 'Kosher' Silverstein, pronounced 'shteen' as is Bern-Shteen, Wein-shteen, Fein-Shteen etc etc He owned that Building. It was never hit by anything as big as an airplane but managed to fall into its own footprint. But luckily for our friend Larry 'Kosher' Shilver-shteen, he took a huge insurance out on the building weeks before it was 'pulled' (his words, not mine). If only we all had the power of foresight like our kosher friend. We would be billionaires.

 

[BATMAN]

The story of 9-11 is best told from the perspective of Building 7 and Benjamin Netanyahoooo's friend Larry 'Kosher' Silverstein, pronounced 'shteen' as is Bern-Shteen, Wein-shteen, Fein-Shteen etc etc He owned that Building. It was never hit by anything as big as an airplane but managed to fall into its own footprint. But luckily for our friend Larry 'Kosher' Shilver-shteen, he took a huge insurance out on the building weeks before it was 'pulled' (his words, not mine). If only we all had the power of foresight like our kosher friend. We would be billionaires.

There were bets in stock market on the shares of united air, in very suspicious way.

 

[NakedLunch]

There were bets in stock market on the shares of united air, in very suspicious way.

Building 7 is a very strange occurrence. Wasnt hit by a plane yet went into free-fall mode. That Silverstein is a very lucky man, not only did he buy the building at the right time, he insured it with specific clauses related to terrorism and his good wife made him a doctor's appointment for that very same morning! I mean how luck can a person get? If you believe all that then there is this planet I own I would like to sell you. Totally kosher.

 

[Penguin]

You guys can insinuate all you like but in the end it (the antisemitism) only reflects poorly on you.

@BATMAN: CLearly some people could have had knowledge of the impending attack: the perpetrators and their sponsors. However, you need to show it was not the folks associated with the attack according to the official story. Which you don't do.

 

[NakedLunch]

Here he is, Kosher Silver-Shteen, pull it. Just pull it. I heard he loves bagels.

 

[BATMAN]

You guys can insinuate all you like but in the end it (the antisemitism) only reflects poorly on you.

@BATMAN: CLearly some people could have had knowledge of the impending attack: the perpetrators and their sponsors. However, you need to show it was not the folks associated with the attack according to the official story. Which you don't do.

I'm only interested in technical aspects and technical analysis.
That was just wrong direction. In any case those bet makers can be easily traced back, in case, those were partners in crime.