Deino
INT'L MOD
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2014
- Messages
- 12,780
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
Sorry ... where is proof that the J-16 is operational and even more the absence of official proof - which is rarely given - is not the proof that it is not, especially in mind of 50+ serial J-10Bs ! And why should - even more how could I - the participation on exercises only be proof for an operational service. Do You have proof that the J-16 already took part ?
It simply makes no sense to "retire" or not-introduce the J-10B if the engine is not the final required one. By that logic, the PLAAF has to retire immediately all J-10A which are also powered by the AL-31FN and even a less-powerful version.
I understand, that the C might be the PLAAF wished version, but I do not understand why You are so obsessed in mind of all other proofs.
Deino
It simply makes no sense to "retire" or not-introduce the J-10B if the engine is not the final required one. By that logic, the PLAAF has to retire immediately all J-10A which are also powered by the AL-31FN and even a less-powerful version.
I understand, that the C might be the PLAAF wished version, but I do not understand why You are so obsessed in mind of all other proofs.
Deino