okay since you cant provide official specification then I have to google it.
Z-19 is inferior in terms of engine, climb rate, speed, load, service ceiling, power/mass.
The specifications for Lch cannot possibly be reliable. The specifications are performance definitions demanded by the end user, which must be met by the prototypes. Have the prototypes met these specifications? Do you know?
The LCA had great specs on paper too, but did the prototypes meet them?
This is why I said it's silly to compare a prototype with something that's in service.
Can't believe you didn't know this.
Do you understand the meaning of official specs?
from your blog (which doesnot provide any official source) it seems to be yet another troll like you): It was reported that Z-19 prototype first flew in May 2010. However one prototype reportedly crashed on September 18, 2010. Currently Z-19 is in production and is entering service with the Army.
where did you come up with the figure of four squadrons? 40-50 helis per year?
Again Troll, provide official specifications of z19. how many z19s are in service?
Did you even read that page? It has photos of the units in service, with their squadron tail numbers. For specs, go to wikipedia. If you don't, then you certainly are stupid.