Last Message from Colonel Mu’ummar Qaddafi

[Vinod2070]

Again you might want to reread your history. In the Gulf War, the Saudis invited the Americans to attack Saddam's forces.

So? Saudis were the traitors or Saddam?

 

[RazPaK]

So? Saudis were the traitors or Saddam?

Both were/are no good.

 

[Vinod2070]

Both were/are no good.

OK. What about the Pakistanis facilitating the occupation of Afghanistan by the crusaders USA?

 

[RazPaK]

OK. What about the Pakistanis facilitating the occupation of Afghanistan by the crusaders USA?

Pakistan is being bullied. US objective of dismantling the Taliban have failed, although they got their target OBL. US is now just causing a mess in the entire region.

 

[Vinod2070]

Pakistan is being bullied. US objective of dismantling the Taliban have failed, although they got their target OBL. US is now just causing a mess in the entire region.

OK. My question was, is it being a traitor to the Ummah by allowing itself to be bullied?

Also any idea why the Muslim society produces such a prodigious number of traitors (your claim)? Could there possibly be something inherently wrong?

 

[jetti]

Pakistan is being bullied. US objective of dismantling the Taliban have failed, although they got their target OBL. US is now just causing a mess in the entire region.

honestly if pakistan helps in getting taliban to power in Afg, they will be ding the biggest gaddhari to their muslim bros in afg

 

[RazPaK]

The Taliban can not be destroyed. The only solution to the Taliban is to disarm them, and slowly advocate them to become a political party.

 

[jetti]

The Taliban can not be destroyed. The only solution to the Taliban is to disarm them, and slowly advocate them to become a political party.

but what about their regressive and repressive policies and mindset ? they are a quasi-terrorist organization and should be treated as such.

ps : evil anywhere seems invincible at first.

 

[RazPaK]

but what about their regressive and repressive policies and mindset ? they are a quasi-terrorist organization and should be treated as such.

Nobody can do anything about it. Even the Americans are trying to have Pakistan mediate talks. War lord culture needs to end in Afghanistan.

 

[Jade]

It is surprising that there is a lot of sympathy for such a despot!!!

 

[livingdead]

The funny thing about gaddafi is he was certain that he was good, and everything he is doing is good for his country, and he is loved by all libyan.
I dont think for a moment he believed he is unpopular and people hate him.

He was certainly a crazy despot,made enemies with everybody, but compared to other despots he was not all that bad.

He deserved to be tried at least by a court of law.

 

[Vinod2070]

Yes very true the MUSALMANS ruled India for more then 1200 yrs made it to be called THE GOLDEN BIRD
and yes the HINDU Traitors sold of to British pennies betrayed their Muslman brothers,
guess we need to be careful on whom we trust.

Guess we prefer to Fight and die in what we believe in rather then bow down to there western masters.

I can only say that you are another one carrying the myth.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-history/97470-india-history-myth-1000-years-mulsim-rule-7.html

Only in your best traditions, you increased it by 200 years more.

 

[asad71]

Gadaffi's martyrdom teaches two lessons:

a. Muslims must be ruled by their own laws - The Sharia. It is fatal to innovate/concoct new ideas into The Sharia.

b. If you are able, you must acquire the nuclear weapon. Gadaffi made the fatal mistake of giving up his nuclear program duped by the sweet talk of the White Man. Sarkozi's Napoleonic dreams would not have occurred if Libya had WMDs.

 

[Solomon2]

Muslims must be ruled by their own laws - The Sharia. It is fatal to innovate/concoct new ideas into The Sharia.

If people can't innovate then Sharia isn't the law of Muslims; rather, Muslims are subjects (willing or not) of The Sharia.

If you are able, you must acquire the nuclear weapon. Gadaffi made the fatal mistake of giving up his nuclear program duped by the sweet talk of the White Man.

Qaddafi gave up his WMD program because he was scared sh!tless after Saddam was booted out of power.

Sarkozi's Napoleonic dreams would not have occurred if Libya had WMDs.

1) The U.S. thought Saddam had nukes and that didn't stop the invasion of Iraq.

2) Napoleon never dreamed of going to war for oil - the modern-day French obsession, expressed numerous times since at least 1990.

3) Pursue WMDs and one risks Pakistan's fate: poverty from diverted resources, radio-chemical pollution from a dangerous industry, electricity shortages due to consumption by uranium enrichment plants, and finally civil war as "Islamic" militant groups, seeing vast power ready-to-grab, start by intimidating the populace, then officialdom, then finally the soldiers in their battle for power.

For in Islam many people want the privilege of imposing Sharia law on others as they are then free to not follow it themselves - isn't that so? That's very close to how the M-B has justified Mubarak's tyrannical rule in Egypt.

 

[Hussein]

1) The U.S. thought Saddam had nukes and that didn't stop the invasion of Iraq.

2) Napoleon never dreamed of going to war for oil - the modern-day French obsession, expressed numerous times since at least 1990.

3) Pursue WMDs and one risks Pakistan's fate: poverty from diverted resources, radio-chemical pollution from a dangerous industry, electricity shortages due to consumption by uranium enrichment plants, and finally civil war as "Islamic" militant groups, seeing vast power ready-to-grab, start by intimidating the populace, then officialdom, then finally the soldiers in their battle for power.

For in Islam many people want the privilege of imposing Sharia law on others for they are then free to not follow it themselves - isn't that so? That's very close to how the M-B has justified Mubarak's tyrannical rule in Egypt.

1/ they didn't think. they were liing about it. they even lie in UNO .
2/ napoléon started to go war when he was not emperor and to defend france from royalists who wanted to give back the country to the royal families. he made some diplomatic mistakes that some wars could be avoided.
2bis/ what is obsession of France? going to war for oil???

hmmmm sharia .. i never believed in it
justice of a country is rules by all citizens then muslims should have their own rules
a good muslim is doing by himself, not forced by an institution.
if someone acting bad, first the court of the country should apply and sharia would be just a morality condamnation
sadly sharia in the world was a disaster .. i mean not a success at all
because the idea of replacing a civil justice is not good
just my personal opinion