What's new

Lapsed tenders hurt Modi's 'Make in India' defence industry push

Bang Galore

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
10,685
Reaction score
12
Country
India
Location
India
(Reuters) - Indian firms have spurned some $15 billion worth of government tenders to make a range of weapons since 2013, Defence Ministry officials say, in a blow to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his drive to wean the country off imported arms.

Executives cited unrealistic quality demands from a military short of planes, tanks and guns as a key reason for their reluctance to bid for projects. Complicating things further, the military doesn't want weapons from Indian firms with no track record in defence manufacturing, experts said.

Irked by India's status as the world's biggest arms importer, Modi wants to build an advanced defence industry but almost a year into his "Make in India" campaign, which aims to turn the country into a manufacturing powerhouse, not one large domestic weapons project has been awarded.

Tenders for anything from air defence guns to surface-to-air missiles to transport planes have lapsed, Defence Ministry officials told Reuters. The tenders total around $15 billion according to a Reuters compilation of offers since early 2013.

"'Make in India' is a laudable aim, but it's moving rather slowly. It's not a switch you can press and everything will fall into place," said Vivek Rae, head of procurement at the Defence Ministry from 2010-2012.

Anil Ambani, the billionaire chairman of the Reliance Group, recounted at a recent conference how Modi asked him if he knew India didn't make tear gas shells.

"Even the tears we shed are foreign," Ambani quoted the nationalist leader, who took office last May, as saying.

Modi wants to build a strong military after years of neglect that military planners say has left India vulnerable should rivals China and Pakistan ever launch a combined attack, although experts say this is highly unlikely. India is being challenged, however, in its Indian Ocean backyard, where China's more modernised navy is starting to assert itself.

Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar has said new defence production policies will be unveiled this month to address the concerns of private firms: opaque procedures, unrealistic quality requirements and slow decision-making.

"We're trying to simplify procedures, create a level-playing field but still there are many cases of zero participation in tenders," said G. Mohan Kumar, the defence production secretary leading the localisation drive.

The military declined to comment, referring queries to the Defence Ministry, which controls procurement.

RINGFENCING PROJECTS

India gets 70 percent of its arms from abroad. For decades, it has bought off-the-shelf equipment mainly from Russia, which offered to assemble some weaponry locally but little in the way of technology transfers.

Modi has vowed to change that by ringfencing $100 billion worth of defence deals for domestic companies over the next decade under which they can build on their own or with foreign partners.

Last year the government asked several Indian companies to show interest in an estimated $1.7 billion deal to replace 1960s-era Swedish air defence guns, but only one said it could meet the requirements, said one of the Defence Ministry officials. He declined to identify the company.

The head of one firm which told the government it was not interested in the project said the military laid down "impossible" requirements by insisting on technology that only foreign manufacturers had. He declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of defence issues.

In November, the government put an estimated $2 billion proposal to replace its ageing fleet of Avro cargo planes on ice after the tender attracted only one bidder, a partnership between Europe's Airbus Group (AIR.PA) and India's Tata Sons TATAS.UL.

"Even if there is an alternative better solution, as per current practice the requirements cannot be changed, or if they are changed it is questioned," said M.V. Kotwal, head of defence business at infrastructure group Larsen and Toubro (LART.NS). "The flexibility is not there."

Over the past 18 months, 41 requests for expressions of interest for naval projects alone fell through because of problems relating to manufacturing requirements, the Defence Ministry official added.

JUMPSTART

Trying to move projects along, Modi's government in February approved an $8 billion proposal to build warships in India that had been awaiting cabinet signoff since 2012.

It has also ordered an accelerated local programme to build six diesel-electric submarines, in addition to six similar vessels that French firm DCNS is assembling in Mumbai port to replace India's ageing underwater fleet.

A Defence Ministry committee submitted a report last month identifying five private and state-run shipyards where the submarines could be built with a foreign partner. It will now invite expressions of interest for the $8.5 billion project.

Experts said one problem is that some military officers eye technology only available in the west, without understanding what Indian firms can produce.

"The armed forces are reluctant to accept hardware that doesn't have a record in operational conditions. Indian companies have no track record," said Bharat Karnad at the Centre for Policy Research in New Delhi.

Retired vice admiral Premvir Das added that to expect Indian companies to manufacture major defence platforms in the forseeable future is to "live in a dreamland".

Lapsed tenders hurt Modi's 'Make in India' defence industry push| Reuters
 
.
How can" make in india " be a sucess if our forces will take only phoren maal . Govt. should (and if necessary must ) pressurise the tri service to take even less advanced indiginious weapons.
 
.
Manufacturing powerhouse?

It will take India at least 20 years to become a mid-level manufacturer that produces mostly labour intensive low-value added goods。
 
.
Where's that Indian guy on this forum who keeps harping about India's 'advanced technological and industrial base' often accompanied by rhetorical jibes at Pakistan. I think this article ought to interest him.
 
.
At least its good start "Make in India policy" , it will take time to archive not in one day but in future will be a good success ..
 
.
How can" make in india " be a sucess if our forces will take only phoren maal . Govt. should (and if necessary must ) pressurise the tri service to take even less advanced indiginious weapons.

Which is why we need a LAW that will ensure that the phoren maal can be considered ONLY when NO similar or replaceable Indian maal is available.
 
Last edited:
.
Policies should be change .Militaries influence in weapon procurement should reduce .
Honestly how can we blame military ?This is a gift of our so calle Congress rule ,only interested in looting and petty politics.

Some morons told us the same idiocy when we decided for a software exporting powerhouse in 1990s in India.But now we have world largest software exports .

Just wait and see after 2 decades.
Manufacturing powerhouse?

It will take India at least 20 years to become a mid-level manufacturer that produces mostly labour intensive low-value added goods。
 
.
Which is why we need a LAW that will ensure that the phoren maal can be considered ONLY when NO similar or replaceable Indian maal is available.

Simply put when we have indigenous maal that can match the tech specs of foreign goods (case and point Arjun's victory of T-90s) the MOD must cancel foreign tenders and order the domestic ones (with an indemnity clause for the local PSU that any lapse in production quality or delivery will have severe consequences).

Anyway IAF or IA or IN don't order; it is MOD that orders.

So Parikkar must shove the capable platform down their throats (more for IAF and IA as IN is pretty indigenous friendly). If the chiefs don't agree, sack them and get a new one.
 
.
Simply put when we have indigenous maal that can match the tech specs of foreign goods (case and point Arjun's victory of T-90s) the MOD must cancel foreign tenders and order the domestic ones (with an indemnity clause for the local PSU that any lapse in production quality or delivery will have severe consequences).

Anyway IAF or IA or IN don't order; it is MOD that orders.

So Parikkar must shove the capable platform down their throats (more for IAF and IA as IN is pretty indigenous friendly). If the chiefs don't agree, sack them and get a new one.

A Law will ensure that. Minus the pushing and shoving down throats.
 
.
A Law will ensure that. Minus the pushing and shoving down throats.
You know how laws are implemented in India.

Law is of no use if it is not forced on certain people.. Army and IAF are those people.
 
.
'Make in India' is a laudable aim, but it's moving rather slowly. It's not a switch you can press and everything will fall into place," said Vivek Rae, head of procurement at the Defence Ministry from 2010-2012.
It must be realized that foreign countries like the U.S. Germany, UK Russia, France etc have considerable experience, building weapon systems since WW I. India hasn't even started and has little experience. It would take us the better part of a decade to start producing quality high tech weapons platforms. 'Make in India' is fine on paper, but the problems are many.
 
Last edited:
.
You know how laws are implemented in India.

Law is of no use if it is not forced on certain people.. Army and IAF are those people.

A law means they can be prosecuted for their actions and can land in Jail for a long time.

That will ensure compliance. Especially for the MoD.
 
.
Where's that Indian guy on this forum who keeps harping about India's 'advanced technological and industrial base' often accompanied by rhetorical jibes at Pakistan. I think this article ought to interest him.
Compared to Pakistan ,India is miles ahead...But on an international stage,there is a lot to do.
 
.
We have to accept Indian Industry will not be able to produce world beating tech day 1. It will take time and somewhere our generals will also have to accept that it is their patriotic duty to work with industry to build that base.

It will NOT be an easy road. Unrealistic to expect too much progress in one year.
 
.
Compared to Pakistan ,India is miles ahead...But on an international stage,there is a lot to do.

Based exactly on what assumption have you decided to make that baseless remark. On the information provided in the article, India imports its tear gas shells whereas Pakistan actually exports them.

Website:

"Contains CS composition and is used for riot control by the law enforcing agencies, using 38mm tear gas gun. The parameters and its characteristics conform to international standards.

tear-gas01.png


Aluminum cased payload enclosed in plastic casing:
Calibre 37 / 38 mm
Range (long) 137 m (1 50 yards)
Range (Small) 68 m (75 yards)
Discharge Time 35 Sec. (Plus)

Shelf Life 4 years
Length 140 mm
Weight 150 - 160 g"

:: GIDS - TEAR-GAS-SHELL ::

India trails in almost everything, except boasting. Pakistan has slowly and steadily risen over the past couple of decades despite being beset by a host of political and demographic challenges.
It's no surprise a nation of only 10% of India's population has carved itself a comfortable little corner in its neighborhood.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom