Lahore , Amritsar and kashmir are safest place in case of Indo-pak nuke war??

[hussain0216]

I don't think Lahore will be the safest...just like in 1965....in case of another war, India will try to capture Lahore and many areas of Pakistan adjacent to IB, and will use it as bargaining chip for Kashmir and Pakistani nukes.

This was the whole purpose of Nasr system

Front line will be Pakistani military with Nasr used with conventional warheads but Nasr armed with nuclear warheads will be armed and ready to burn any Indian advance towards major cities or populated areas

In 1965 Pakistani army crushed the shameful Indian attack against a populated major city
Prior to this neither side had attacked outside Kashmir against any major city, but India was about to lose Kashmir and in desperation attacked Lahore, the Pakistani counter attack defeated the Indian attempt but imagine if it hadn't and the possible consequences for a major city

So Nasr's whole purpose is to annihilate any I'll conceived Indian attempt to hit any populated area or city near IB

 

[ito]

Yes, conventionally, Lahore is soft target for India.

Even Islamabad is not very far away from IB

 

[hussain0216]

No nukes will impact. Pakistani launch sites will be disabled or captured by Indian special forces. Sub or aircraft based launches are possible but only tactical warheads are then likely. By that time our shield will be up properly. Chances are low again because the IAF and the IN will establish air and naval superiority within 48 hours.


India will bypass Lahore. Sialkot will be taken. Then Islamabad. Lahore too peripheral.

Pakistan is one of the most heavily armed nations in the world with a population of 200 million and we will be defending, any attacker, let alone a poorly trained Indian military with dodgy capabilities to service their weapons would be butchered

If any Pakistani cities come under attack
Pakistan will immediately escalate to target any and all Indian cities with all possible weaponry at our disposal.We are looking to induct 8plus sub's specially adapted and made for Pakistan to house our sea based second strike, with SLCMs and MIRV capable missiles and a whole ethos built around producing missiles able to circumvent defences we are well stocked and able to end the Hindu rashtra forever

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

Pakistan is one of the most heavily armed nations in the world with a population of 200 million and we will be defending, any attacker, let alone a poorly trained Indian military with dodgy capabilities to service their weapons would be butchered

If any Pakistani cities come under attack
Pakistan will immediately escalate to target any and all Indian cities with all possible weaponry at our disposal.We are looking to induct 8plus sub's specially adapted and made for Pakistan to house our sea based second strike, with SLCMs and MIRV capable missiles and a whole ethos built around producing missiles able to circumvent defences we are well stocked and able to end the Hindu rashtra forever

You have been lost a big part of lands in wars with India. You have been lost 70000 +people in a war of terrorism. You have been lost 110 billion $ economy since 2008.

Still you shamelessly addressing "poor trained" for Indian forces. Clap for your idiocy.

 

[I.R.A]

Op is mentally ten year old ........ who doesn't know the safest place is toilet in his house.

 

[graphican]

Sometimes I use to think that if war happens between India and Pakistan in future , it will not be conventional war but nuke war for 99% sure.
But the question is which cities are most safest city to stay in both countries??
I'm from Mumbai which is very sweet and soft target in case of nuke war in future same as Karachi is soft target for India in Pakistan.
So which cities are safest in case of nuke war??
How about Lahore for Pakistan and Amritsar for India?
Distance between these cities are less than 50km. So if you nuke Lahore then you automatic nuke Amritsar too bcz of radiation .Half of Amritsar generation will be destroyed too if India nuke Lahore. Same case with Pakistan. If Pakistan nuke Amritsar , it will kill Lahore too. So both countries will hesitate to nuke these cities.
So it makes Lahore and Amritsar most safest cities in nuke war.
Kashmir- Kashmir is also safest place in India for a particular reason and you know it well.
But at the same these places are most soft target in a conventional war too.
My Question is what do you think which cities are most safest in your country to stay in case of nuke war??
NOTE- I'm not war lover or a fanboy. I'm all for peace. But just a Question in case......

A short answer to your question is that there are none. Get out of large cities for sure - and try to live in places which are away from any significant military installation.

But, when borders change and millilitres march in each other's territories, importance of places from offensive/defensive perspectives change. So an area which you may find lacks strategic value, may become strategic and be demanded by both sides.

Your best bet is that war doesn't break out, or if it does then it wouldn't go nuclear. But Muslims know through Ghazwatulhind and so did Mahatma Gandhi Jee as he predicted, India's end is near and its not going to be pretty.

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

Op is mentally ten year old ........ who doesn't know the safest place is toilet in his house.

And Chaccha, you have won a job of "toilet cleaner" by giving this precious suggestion.

 

[Skull and Bones]

Once I read in news a statement of Indian army chief, who stated they will sacrifice Sikhs in case of war with Pakistan.
Any war with Pakistan, India will use it as an opportunity to get rid of both separatist nations, Kashmiris and Sikhs. I also believe India will bomb its Dalits as well, but will label it as Pakistani bombs... Fake encounters is hall mark of Indian army.

Show me the news article.

 

[I.R.A]

And Chaccha, you have won a job of "toilet cleaner" by giving this precious suggestion.

At least I know what a nuke war means ............ learn to leave the toilet seat clean for others ..... and lift it before you start peeing all over the place. These advises have been given in greater interest of public service.

 

[Jackdaws]

Don't be so apocalyptic. India Pak are like 2 egoistical brothers always at it. We aren't going to war with each other. We just love needling one another.

 

[The Deterrent]

Sometimes I use to think that if war happens between India and Pakistan in future , it will not be conventional war but nuke war for 99% sure.
But the question is which cities are most safest city to stay in both countries??
I'm from Mumbai which is very sweet and soft target in case of nuke war in future same as Karachi is soft target for India in Pakistan.
So which cities are safest in case of nuke war??
How about Lahore for Pakistan and Amritsar for India?
Distance between these cities are less than 50km. So if you nuke Lahore then you automatic nuke Amritsar too bcz of radiation .Half of Amritsar generation will be destroyed too if India nuke Lahore. Same case with Pakistan. If Pakistan nuke Amritsar , it will kill Lahore too. So both countries will hesitate to nuke these cities.
So it makes Lahore and Amritsar most safest cities in nuke war.
Kashmir- Kashmir is also safest place in India for a particular reason and you know it well.
But at the same these places are most soft target in a conventional war too.
My Question is what do you think which cities are most safest in your country to stay in case of nuke war??
NOTE- I'm not war lover or a fanboy. I'm all for peace. But just a Question in case......

First of all, most nukes that Pakistan & India have are optimized for an air-burst. This ensures maximum damage (via shock-wave & thermal radiation aka heat) and minimum fallout. Contrary to popular belief, damage via nuclear radiation is neither efficient nor desirable (except in case of neutron bombs). So most of the nuclear explosions in this sort of hypothetical situation will be 'clean', people out of the radius of shockwave and heat affects will be safe, provided that nobody is crazy enough to make a place permanently uninhabitable. A typical safe distance for an airburst is around 10 kilometers for the largest Pakistani weapon design (40-50kt).

Here is a sample:

Now coming to your question of which areas in India would be safer than others. You wouldn't want to be anywhere near:
-The top 25 Indian cities (by population size)
-A military base (air/army/naval, both conventional and nuclear)
-A city with a military base

In a more broader sense, these states would be the most unsafe (ranked to some extent)
1. Delhi
2. Punjab
3. Rajasthan (western)
4. Maharashtra (western)
5. Haryana
6. Gujrat
7. Kashmir
8. Uttar Pradesh (northern)
9. Madhya Pradesh (northern)

Simplifying it further, Central, Southern & Eastern India will be much safer than the Northern and Western India.

No nukes will impact. Pakistani launch sites will be disabled or captured by Indian special forces. Sub or aircraft based launches are possible but only tactical warheads are then likely. By that time our shield will be up properly. Chances are low again because the IAF and the IN will establish air and naval superiority within 48 hours.


India will bypass Lahore. Sialkot will be taken. Then Islamabad. Lahore too peripheral.

Wakey wakey, its wayyy past snoring time.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

India will not need to use nukes. Indian forces will reach the Afghan frontier within a week. Two Max.
But resistance will continue for a month.

PRC changes the equation entirely though.

Of course... afterall india is america anf Pakistan is the Gaza Strip.

1-2 weeks.. BC .. check out statistics.. you almost lost panjab to Pakistan in 65 in the hope of capturing lahore.

 

[surya kiran]

With all the talk on you chaps nuking one another, you should do this first. And one wonders why SA is like this.

 

[Basel]

Most riskiest would be capital cities Islamabad and Delhi, then will come the financial hubs Mumbai and Karachi, then it will be MAD any which ways. In a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan if any major city you would wish to be would be Chennai (Farthest from the conflict zone).

No big city will be safe in India, smaller ones specially near Bangladesh will be safer.

I don't think Lahore will be the safest...just like in 1965....in case of another war, India will try to capture Lahore and many areas of Pakistan adjacent to IB, and will use it as bargaining chip for Kashmir and Pakistani nukes.

TNWs are developed to avoid that situation and making sure any misadventure by India could end up becoming MAD.

Even Islamabad is not very far away from IB

Islamabad may be close to IB but it's surrounding allow defender good support against attacking force.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Of course... afterall india is america anf Pakistan is the Gaza Strip.

1-2 weeks.. BC .. check out statistics.. you almost lost panjab to Pakistan in 65 in the hope of capturing lahore.

Targeting cities is such a 20th century concept.
The Afghan frontier should be reached within 2 weeks. The battle for Lahore will go on longer.

Wakey wakey, its wayyy past snoring time.

No wishful thinking sir.
But for the PRChinese direct interventions, Pakistan will be overrun quickly.