What's new

Korean president approves deployment of Japan AEGIS ship in the Yellow Sea

Deng has warned about this sort of situation and warned the next generation not to flex China's military power for the next 100 years.

Unfortunately, Zhang Jimin and Hu Jintao ignored Deng's warning and China is encircled by enemies.
 
.
I want to explain why I virtually never discuss Japan's or South Korea's military. Technologically, Japan and South Korea have more powerful militaries than India.

However, India has an important advantage over Japan and South Korea. India has strategic depth. It is my belief that once the PLA starts ripping into South Korea, the war will be over in a couple of weeks. However, India is one million square miles and there is a lot of Indians to chase down. It will take forever.

In my opinion, India is a much more formidable military opponent for China. It will be extremely difficult to subdue India. The idea of occupying all those overpopulated Indian cities is a nightmare. However, occupying South Korea is a minor logistics issue. Once you capture Seoul, South Korea has fallen.

On the contrary, Japan is much more formidable adversary because there's a sea between China and Japan. Hitler couldn't defeat Britain because of the narrow English Channel. On the other hand, China has a land border with india and China's forces are far superior both technologically and numerically to india's forces. Besides, China doesn't need to occupy india to defeat india, all it has to do is crush india's feeble military.
 
.
On the contrary, Japan is much more formidable adversary because there's a sea between China and Japan. Hitler couldn't defeat Britain because of the narrow English Channel. On the other hand, China has a land border with india and China's forces are far superior both technologically and numerically to india's forces. Besides, China doesn't need to occupy india to defeat india, all it has to do is crush india's feeble military.

Before China comes for India, China would come for Bangladesh first.
 
.
On the contrary, Japan is much more formidable adversary because there's a sea between China and Japan. Hitler couldn't defeat Britain because of the narrow English Channel. On the other hand, China has a land border with india and China's forces are far superior both technologically and numerically to india's forces. Besides, China doesn't need to occupy india to defeat india, all it has to do is crush india's feeble military.

You forgot something important. Chinese bombs come in 3.3-megatons each. If the Americans can bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki with puny 20-kiloton weapons to force a Japanese surrender then a Chinese 3.3-megaton bomb on Tokyo should speed things up.

Here is a video of the 3.3-megaton Chinese thermonuclear explosion in 1967.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
On the contrary, Japan is much more formidable adversary because there's a sea between China and Japan. Hitler couldn't defeat Britain because of the narrow English Channel. On the other hand, China has a land border with india and China's forces are far superior both technologically and numerically to india's forces. Besides, China doesn't need to occupy india to defeat india, all it has to do is crush india's feeble military.

The Himalayas are the most formidable obstacle b/w China and India.

Indian military ... feeble ... that too coming from a Bangaldeshi .. lol :rofl: :lol:
 
.
You forgot something important. Chinese bombs come in 3.3-megatons each. If the Americans can bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki with puny 20-kiloton weapons to force a Japanese surrender then a Chinese 3.3-megaton bomb on Tokyo should speed things up.
Not at all, because Beijing too gets nuked.
 
.
Not at all, because Beijing too gets nuked.

Japan has no nuclear weapons, not even small atomic ones. Neither do Koreans.

The U.S. was too scared to bomb a supply tunnel during the Russo-Georgian War. In the end, the U.S. will complain but it will not risk its own existence for some Japanese or Koreans. Get used to it. Truth hurts. You guys are convenient puppets. Nothing more.
 
.
In the end, the U.S. will complain but it will not risk its own existence for some Japanese or Koreans.
The US surely did for China during the Sino-Soviet war. It was none other than China that was the biggest beneficiary of the US nuclear umbrella policy as they were saved from the impending Soviet nuclear strike. And unlike the implicit umbrella that the US provided to China during the Sino-Soviet war, the one the US is providing to Japan and Korea is explicit and public.

So why would the US risk a nuclear war with China to provide the nuclear umbrella? Because without it every country on earth would be nuclear armed.

Get used to it.
Sure, we are getting used to the nuclear umbrella.
 
.
The US surely did for China during the Sino-Soviet war. It was none other than China that was the biggest beneficiary of the US nuclear umbrella policy as they were saved from the impending Soviet nuclear strike. And unlike the implicit umbrella that the US provided to China during the Sino-Soviet war, the one the US is providing to Japan and Korea is explicit and public.

So why would the US risk a nuclear war with China to provide the nuclear umbrella? Because without it every country on earth would be nuclear armed.


Sure, we are getting used to the nuclear umbrella.

No. The Sino-Soviet border war was in 1969. China exploded its 22-kiloton atomic bomb in 1964 and its 3.3-megaton thermonuclear bomb in 1967. China was already a thermonuclear power before the Sino-Soviet clash of 1969.

Here is a video of the 22-kiloton Chinese atomic explosion in 1964.


----------

Here is a video of the 3.3-megaton Chinese thermonuclear explosion in 1967.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Deng has warned about this sort of situation and warned the next generation not to flex China's military power for the next 100 years.

Unfortunately, Zhang Jimin and Hu Jintao ignored Deng's warning and China is encircled by enemies.
LOL at the inferiority complex Korean so terrified of China's military power. He hasn't forgotten the last time PLA entered Seoul and allowed North Korean soldiers to commit atrocities on their Southern "cousins." :lol:
 
. . .
Koreans and Japs being proud puppets is in their culture.
Back in the old Chinese imperial days, Korean royalty used to scurry over the Yalu and beg the Chinese emperor for aid whenever the short wa people from Japan invaded them. In the Imjin war, the Ming emperor saved the korean ***** over and over again using a mottley of troops from all over the empire. During the Siege of Pyongyang, Ming soldiers dressed up in Korean army white to fool the japs into thinking that they were crappy korean soldiers and easily stormed the city.

Do china get any thanks for helping little grandson Korea? Nope. Because Korea has a culture of ingratitude, arrogance, subservience and delusion.

Koreans wouldn't nickname the PLA "Joke Army" if they were afraid.
Joke like when the PVA took Seoul twice? Was that funny to you?
 
. .
The Himalayas are the most formidable obstacle b/w China and India.

Indian military ... feeble ... that too coming from a Bangaldeshi .. lol :rofl: :lol:

The great Himalayas couldn't prevent the great indian defeat in 1962! As for BD, when compared with a country like BD india looks very powerful but when compared with China india looks like a mouse and that's why our indian friends are very quick to bring in BD even though we're talking about China, Japan, Korea and india. I don't mind it at all, matter of fact, it amuses me to watch how those indians make themselves feel good about themselves.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom