What's new

Korea as Number One

Samsung's processor is in countless devices, including Apple's products. The only processor China have so far is one for narrow use. Samsung is the world's leader in memory products. China is not. Finally, the fact that China does not have a reusable space vehicle, by your own 'logic', China CANNOT make such a vehicle. You dug this hole. So much for 'high Chinese IQ'.

Korea is still dependent from the European and Japanese tool machines to make chips.

We abandonned our reusable space vehicle development like the Sänger and Hermes because we saw how expensive and futile the Space Shuttle was. Russia also abandonned their Buran and Ptichka because of exploding cost.

The Chinese would indeed be stupid to follow the path of so many abandonned and failed projects.
 
. .
Very weak retort. I'm disappointed in you. I'll give you one point out of a possible five.
:lol: As if your approval of me matters. Your ego have always been this forum's laughing point. You get five-stars for that. The Space Shuttle is a failed design? By what standards that China set? By what standards that ANYBODY set?
 
.
:lol: As if your approval of me matters. Your ego have always been this forum's laughing point. You get five-stars for that. The Space Shuttle is a failed design? By what standards that China set? By what standards that ANYBODY set?

laughing point for the cheerleading fools!

this is one of the standards we set:

TD-SCDMA was developed in the People's Republic of China by the Chinese Academy of Telecommunications Technology (CATT), Datang Telecom, and Siemens AG in an attempt to avoid dependence on Western technology. This is likely primarily for practical reasons, since other 3G formats require the payment of patent fees to a large number of Western patent holders.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TD-SCDMA
 
.
Götterdämmerung;3031048 said:
Korea is still dependent from the European and Japanese tool machines to make chips.

We abandonned our reusable space vehicle development like the Sänger and Hermes because we saw how expensive and futile the Space Shuttle was. Russia also abandonned their Buran and Ptichka because of exploding cost.

The Chinese would indeed be stupid to follow the path of so many abandonned and failed projects.
I guess the Moon mission or other space exploration followed the same 'logic'? But Germany, or wherever you came from, have no problems learning from US in these endeavors? It is always easy to nit-pick the leaders when you have nothing to show.

laughing point for the cheerleading fools!
But no issues there when the Pakistanis and anyone else sucked up to you Chinese boys?
 
. .
I guess the Moon mission or other space exploration followed the same 'logic'? But Germany, or wherever you came from, have no problems learning from US in these endeavors? It is always easy to nit-pick the leaders when you have nothing to show.

It's considered smart to learn from the mistake of others.

The US was until the end of WWII technologically far inferior to Europe and it became a technology superpower after you "confiscated" our patents and experts as your spoils of war. tsk, tsk, tsk
 
.
Götterdämmerung;3031079 said:
It's considered smart to learn from the mistake of others.

The US was until the end of WWII technologically far inferior to Europe and it became a technology superpower after you "confiscated" our patents and experts as your spoils of war. tsk, tsk, tsk
Absolutely...When you cannot do something for whatever reasons and you need a face saving measure, exaggerate the flaws of others' accomplishments and call them 'mistakes'. Put yourself on a pedestal of your own manufacture. Simply cannot lose.
 
.
Götterdämmerung;3031079 said:
It's considered smart to learn from the mistake of others.

The US was until the end of WWII technologically far inferior to Europe and it became a technology superpower after you "confiscated" our patents and experts as your spoils of war. tsk, tsk, tsk


Don't forget to add many bright talents left the war torn Europe and headed for the land of free too.
 
.
Absolutely...When you cannot do something for whatever reasons and you need a face saving measure, exaggerate the flaws of others' accomplishments and call them 'mistakes'. Put yourself on a pedestal of your own manufacture. Simply cannot lose.

And why did the US abandon the Space Shuttel without a Space Shuttel II if it was so great?

I don't need to safe face since our manufacturing industry is indeed superior to the US not to speak of our superior and sophisticated lifestyle industry.
 
.
Given the fact that there are 10 billion more Chinese than Koreans, it is not very fair to compare the two countries. Based on per capita terms, Korea scores higher points on science and many other issues than China.
The author of the article is talking about the sophistication level of a society; it takes a sophisticated society to make world-class goods and services, and the Korean society's level of sophistication is high enough to produce Japan-beating goods and services, thus there should be the Korean sequel to the 1979's best seller to "Japanese as Number One" which foretold the forthcoming of Japanese dominance in the world markets in the 80s upto mid-90s. "Koreans beating Japan and what Japanese must do to fight back" theme is the hottest discussion topic on Japanese media and press, but this is one of few US articles discussing this topic.

Taiwan doesn't yet have the Korean-level of sophistication that produces not only world beating products, but also influence Asia culturally with movies, TV shows, music, and fashion, so they cannot rise and compete. China's even further behind than Taiwan in the sophistication level of society, and this is why you don't see world beating goods and services from China and it is highly unlikely you will in the near future.
 
.
The author of the article is talking about the sophistication level of a society; it takes a sophisticated society to make world-class goods and services, and the Korean society's level of sophistication is high enough to produce Japan-beating goods and services, thus there should be the Korean sequel to the 1979's best seller to "Japanese as Number One" which foretold the forthcoming of Japanese dominance in the world markets in the 80s upto mid-90s. "Koreans beating Japan and what Japanese must do to fight back" theme is the hottest discussion topic on Japanese media and press, but this is one of few US articles discussing this topic.

Taiwan doesn't yet have the Korean-level of sophistication that produces not only world beating products, but also influence Asia culturally with movies, TV shows, music, and fashion, so they cannot rise and compete. China's even further behind than Taiwan in the sophistication level of society, and this is why you don't see world beating goods and services from China and it is highly unlikely you will in the near future.

I'm too lazy to repost Taiwan's 100,000 U.S.-granted patents, which is something like 20,000 more than South Korean U.S.-granted USPTO patents for the last 30 years. You're inferior in innovation, but you're too afraid to admit it.

LG has been stealing Taiwanese technology (such as LCD manufacturing technology from Taiwan's AU Optronics, which was proven in an U.S. federal court) for decades. Now, ITRI is also suing LG (while the same ITRI Taiwanese technology is being legally licensed by Samsung). You Koreans are a bunch of thieves and then you brag about your economy based on stolen Taiwanese tech. Shame on you!
 
. .
23 million Taiwanese have outgunned 50 million South Koreans in innovation

oRgF7.jpg

23 million Taiwanese have out-innovated 50 million South Koreans over the last 30 years. Taiwan has received 16,046 more U.S.-granted USPTO patents than South Korea. LG is the biggest South Korean thief in stealing Taiwanese technology from AU Optronics and ITRI.

Source: Patents By Country, State, and Year - All Patent Types (December 2011)
 
.
GLOBAL PUBLISHING:
CHANGES IN SUBMISSION TRENDS AND
THE IMPACT ON SCHOLARLY PUBLISHERS

APRIL 2012

Page 3_GlobalPublishing_WP.pdf


TABLE 1. TOP 15 INCREASES IN PROPORTION OF SUBMISSIONS.(academic papers)

COUNTRY GROSS INCREASE IN SUBMISSIONS % CHANGE IN TOTAL SHARE

2005–2010

China 94,033 5.1%

India 40,394 2.0%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 19,140 1.4%
Malaysia 5,786 0.4%
Australia 21,305 0.4%

Taiwan 19,340 0.4%

Egypt 5,992 0.3%

Korea, Republic of 20,131 0.3%

Pakistan 3,316 0.2%
Portugal 4,686 0.2%
Brazil 13,612 0.2%
Tunisia 2,272 0.2%
Nigeria 2,406 0.1%
Norway 5,011 0.1%
South Africa 3,005 0.1%

TABLE 2. TOP 15 DECREASES IN PROPORTION OF SUBMISSIONS

COUNTRY GROSS INCREASE IN SUBMISSIONS % CHANGE IN TOTAL SHARE

2005–2010


United States 147,628 -3.3%

Japan 24,453 -1.7%


Germany 23,306 -0.8%
Italy 18,691 -0.8%
France 15,100 -0.7%
Canada 20,710 -0.6%
Turkey 14,111 -0.6%
Netherlands 10,883 -0.4%
United Kingdom 42,374 -0.3%
Sweden 6,494 -0.3%
Israel 4,506 -0.3%
Spain 17,934 -0.3%
Greece 4,493 -0.2%
Finland 3,140 -0.2%
Switzerland 5,035 -0.2%

Pitiful S Korean losers!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom