What's new

Khilji, the first Afghan dyansty of Hindostan

Lol
Go and look at the tech they have and then die in shame.

U have to be to stupid to compare india to iraq and saudi etc.
Only iran and turkey have some hope.rest are finished.

Average indian is poor today,yes,but at least in next 20-30 years he has hope.
What can a person hope in syria or iraq or palestine or even pakistan?
Now egypt has joined the ranks.

U guys kept on laughing at others and we at least kept trying.

lol tech? Did India invent new engine which work with cow dung? And now you are saying in 30 years lol keep moving you goal posts. India hunger is comparable to central african states. You guys have lower per capita then Pakistan, and it will keep getting lower.

Pakistan for 90% of its history has been better of then India in terms of gdp per capita. I wonder what hope majority of Indians have in India? Considiring 60% of them shit in open.

And here you are bosting about being super power lol
 
New graduate from madarassa :cheesy:

So kid, google search just two things -
1- HDI comparison of India and pakistan
2- Per capita GDP of pak and india.

Pak gdp per capita 1450 while india 1250. latest report which say Pakistan is less hungry then India. but keep blieving in hindu mandir propaganda to feel better
 
Are you high again? Cow dung maybe?

Afghanistan yes average Indian is better off then Afgha. Great arcvhiment comparing your self to war torn country, But Middle east, Iran and Iraq? Are you foorking lost your mind? Indian poverty is comparable to central african states.


Have you seen the latest figures of food security per person and percentage of increase in poverty from last decade of your own country.

You wanna see some reports on how fast its growing inside?
 
india is still a continuous civilisation...majority of arabs were not arabs once they lost their culture..turks of todays turkey are nothing like the real turks. Iranians majority of ther history were conquered nation and so were afghans. difference is we still consider then invader as invaders and not worship them and start calling them as if they became indian.. otherwise everyone other than british became indianised and gave up their culture

First of all if you are true jatt then your origin lies in Iran. But i doubt it because you probably look like average tamil and now try hard to fit with them.
 
Lol
Go and look at the tech they have and then die in shame.

U have to be to stupid to compare india to iraq and saudi etc.
Only iran and turkey have some hope.rest are finished.

Average indian is poor today,yes,but at least in next 20-30 years he has hope.
What can a person hope in syria or iraq or palestine or even pakistan?
Now egypt has joined the ranks.

U guys kept on laughing at others and we at least kept trying.

You were talking about culture so tech?. So as you pointed out there is no difference in a Tamil and a Pakistani, well thankyou for your impartial verdict.
 
@AUSTERLITZ

You've mentioned something about a Rashtrakuta-Chalukya alliance against the Arabs. Can you elaborate more about this? AFAIK, the Rashtrakutas and Chalukyas were locked in a power-struggle over Karnata(modern day Karnataka).
 
Have you seen the latest figures of food security per person and percentage of increase in poverty from last decade of your own country.

You wanna see some reports on how fast its growing inside?

@Nuri Natt like other Pakistanis will say how corrupt Pakistani government is manipulating data not show Pakistan's real development and developed status. :omghaha::omghaha:
 
Have you seen the latest figures of food security per person and percentage of increase in poverty from last decade of your own country.

You wanna see some reports on how fast its growing inside?

Pakistan is poor but here we are comparing with super power India. Here is latest hunger report, now go and die with shame

GHI_2013_by_severity.png
 
First of all if you are true jatt then your origin lies in Iran. But i doubt it because you probably look like average tamil and now try hard to fit with them.

As if u being a true jatt has conquered the world and defeated ur enemies.

Abe jag ja neend se.
Sapne lain naal kuch ni hona,karo kuch javako
 
They were more interested in saving their skin and their position in society.

They did the same with the British. As long as their position in society was not challenged, they did not mind a change of guard at the ruling side of things.

So they pretty much played the role of sycophants to the rulers :lol:

Brahmins are priests, they got their social power the same way the clergy in Europe got from being the only people able to decipher the holy books.

Since they made a tiny percentage of the population, they did need this ritualistic and social power to keep the Lower castes at bay. :-)

People who are bookworms make poor fighters my friend :D

You mean to say I make a poor fighter?:mad:

I challenge you to a game of snakes and ladders.:partay:
 
@AUSTERLITZ

You've mentioned something about a Rashtrakuta-Chalukya alliance against the Arabs. Can you elaborate more about this? AFAIK, the Rashtrakutas and Chalukyas were locked in a power-struggle over Karnata(modern day Karnataka).

It was the triple alliance of Chalukyas, Gurjar-Pratiharas and Rajputs of Mewar who collectively defeated Arabs around 738AD and stopped their movement deeper into India after the fall of Sindh.

Battle of Rajasthan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Back
Top Bottom