What's new

Khalistan Thrives.

Did you either condemned it in any way. ?
When an Indian soldier is killed by say Kashmiri freedom fighters, yous talk about declaring war on Pakistan, well the Sikh body guard witnessed so many of his fellows and perhaps dear ones slaughtered on Indra Gandhi's orders, since he was in no position to drag her to a Geneva Court, he resorted to natural instincts.

I did not condemn a massacre here on this thread and you allege i support it.

You justify a murder, and then go on to lecture me on morals.

Keep up this nonsense, you are fooling noone except some willing pakistanis here.
 
Belive me they think they won Kargil after watching that Bollywood mish mash Border. Their soldiers are told that there are elections happening in IOK, so they have to perform a tour of duty.
It's only after arriving in IOK, they learn the reality and end up either killing their seniors or blowing their own BHEJUA to pieces.

1. Border was about 1971 war not kargil
2. 1965 - strategic objective of pakistan-start a popular revolt in Kashmir- Thwarted by India.. Pakistan lost
3. 1971 - strategic objective of India- Liberate Bangladesh- Succeeded- Pakistan lost
4. 1984 -strategic objective of India- Secure strategic heights of Siachin- Succeeded-Pakistan Lost
5. 1998 - Strategic objective of Pakistan- capture Kargil heights- Thwarted by India- Pakistan lost
 
I did not condemn a massacre here on this thread and you allege i support it.

You justify a murder, and then go on to lecture me on morals.

Keep up this nonsense, you are fooling noone except some willing pakistanis here.

As i said being a victor and being conceived in the same year are two different achievements.:lol: So we know who is oozing with nonsense.:disagree:
One murder doesn't give the legit to a genocide, hence your digression holds no substance. I guess the few Indians here never miss an opportunity to pat each others back, suppose that gives your ideology a new lease of life.:tdown:
 
As i said being a victor and being conceived in the same year are two different achievements.:lol: So we know who is oozing with nonsense.:disagree:
One murder doesn't give the legit to a genocide, hence your digression holds no substance. I guess the few Indians here never miss an opportunity to pat each others back, suppose that gives your ideology a new lease of life.:tdown:

Your incoherence has reached new levels.

I'll repeat, i did not and nobody here did justify any massacre yet you are ranting about it. The only person justifying bloodshed is YOU, and not even pakistanis are patting you on the back, and indian sikhs have already kicked it enough on this thread.
 
1. Border was about 1971 war not kargil
2. 1965 - strategic objective of pakistan-start a popular revolt in Kashmir- Thwarted by India.. Pakistan lost
3. 1971 - strategic objective of India- Liberate Bangladesh- Succeeded- Pakistan lost
4. 1984 -strategic objective of India- Secure strategic heights of Siachin- Succeeded-Pakistan Lost
5. 1998 - Strategic objective of Pakistan- capture Kargil heights- Thwarted by India- Pakistan lost

Border was an example how you Indians fall victim to your own propaganda, since the Longewala battle is now being described in a different versions. @ 1965, you need to study and find out who was anxious for the Tashkent agreement. As for Siachin, care to elaborate, how many of your officers have been Court Martialed for staging mock combats, and since you keen in giving break downs, surprise no mention of the most recent stand off in 2002.


Major sacked over Siachen fake killings
 
Last edited:
Your incoherence has reached new levels.

I'll repeat, i did not and nobody here did justify any massacre yet you are ranting about it. The only person justifying bloodshed is YOU, and not even pakistanis are patting you on the back, and indian sikhs have already kicked it enough on this thread.

Well blow me, scroll back and enhance your vision how your Sikh friend perceived the massacre, and stop gloating about getting your back rubbed, there are is medal table here.
 
Border was an example how you Indians fall victim to your own propaganda, since the Longewala battle is now being described in a different versions.
still... pakistani attack was repelled.. whatever the modalities and reasons..

@ 1965, you need to study and find out who was anxious for the Simla agreement.
1965.. shimla agreement.. ??? You need to study your country's history more..

As for Siachin, care to elaborate, how many of your officers have been Court Martialed for staging mock combats, and since you keen in giving break downs, surprise no mention of the most recent stand off in 2002.


Major sacked over Siachen fake killings
India holds the strategic posts it captured in 1984. Thats what matters.. rest is all smoke screen..

2002: India threatened.. didnt carry thru the threat.. stalemate... happy??
 
Listen up Indians,

This thread was about the Khalistan movement and the Genocide of Sikhs, not about India versus Pakistan.
You people conveniently digress to escape a healthy debate and ironically have the knack to accuse other party of troll.

Basically stick to the topic hence put up or shut up.
 
Listen up Indians,

This thread was about the Khalistan movement and the Genocide of Sikhs, not about India versus Pakistan.
You people conveniently digress to escape a healthy debate and ironically have the knack to accuse other party of troll.

Basically stick to the topic hence put up or shut up.
okay, on what basis did you put up a thread "Khalistan thrives".
1. can you give rough number of sikhs who are supporting khalistan movement?
2. can you tell which part of the world they are living currently? india or outside india.
3. are they carrying out any agitations/protests? dates and places of protest.

Then we will discuss:azn:
 
okay, on what basis did you put up a thread "Khalistan thrives".
1. can you give rough number of sikhs who are supporting khalistan movement?
2. can you tell which part of the world they are living currently? india or outside india.
3. are they carrying out any agitations/protests? dates and places of protest.

Then we will discuss:azn:

Don't you get it? This thread was created to agitate and provoke Indians. No matter how much we justify but no ones gonna listen, then soon we'll lose our calm and start fighting and half the Indians would be banned.

Just stop replying. They won't listen a bit. Let the thread sink.
 
okay, on what basis did you put up a thread "Khalistan thrives".
1. can you give rough number of sikhs who are supporting khalistan movement?
2. can you tell which part of the world they are living currently? india or outside india.
3. are they carrying out any agitations/protests? dates and places of protest.

Then we will discuss:azn:
In case you didn't notice, the images and footage is there for your enlightenment, and for those who digress to ranting about flaming need to address their bankrupt mentality as i didn't even add any POV to the thread.:chilli:
 
Listen up Indians,

This thread was about the Khalistan movement and the Genocide of Sikhs, not about India versus Pakistan.
You people conveniently digress to escape a healthy debate and ironically have the knack to accuse other party of troll.

Basically stick to the topic hence put up or shut up.

hmm.. who posted the video about the indian toilet system?? Going by your above statement, are you gonna shut up??
 
hmm.. who posted the video about the indian toilet system?? Going by your above statement, are you gonna shut up??

Since you have the gift of the gob, put it some worthy use and explain
what was the purpose of posting General Niazi's image. ???
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom