'Keep out!': China sent 6 warnings to a US Navy plane, but the US didn't back down

[oprih]

Ministry of Warning daily schedule

9 AM - Warning to India on Doklam
10 AM - Warning to US on SCS
11 AM - Warning to SCS states
12 PM - Warning to Japan
1 PM - Lunch
2 PM - Warning to India- Japan over trade corridor
3 PM - Warning to Mongolia
4 PM - Warning to Pakistan against any misadventures of their "assets" in CPEC
5 PM - Warning to African Countries, Sri Lanka, Myanmar etc to pay their debts

Yup your mighty indian army run at an unbelievable speed away from the arriving Chinese army. No skirmish, just indians running for their life and having their presence completely wiped out in doklam.

 

[cochine]

China was avenging the Cham.

Cham was very aggressive, she had continuously invaded and liked to attache Viet in to Chamkingom in our history, Cham had occupied Viet capital Hanoi. At the end, she paid for her mistake. There was history, like history of China related to Huno.
Apply your logic, USA can liberate Mongolian, Manchurian, Min Yue, Nan Yue, Tibetan from occupation of China.

 

[rott]

It is relevant as far as I am concerned.
You are taking my quotes out of context.
Anyway I am not here to debate with fellow Singaporeans.
I never rebut your STUPID VIEWS here even though I disagreed.
Maybe our younger generation don't know what it is to be united despite differences when facing foreign adversaries.
You should have gone to Indonesia during the racial riots, and reasoned with them.
Fortunately you are not born during our racial riots, they need you to teach them international rule of law.

This is my last reply to you, it hurts me much that you waste time here against your own people.
I am here for leisure, nothing serious, not to hear your naive logic.
.

Bro, ignore those shallow losers. They don't know that nationality can be changed but one cannot change their ethnicity or race.
Gambit knows that. That's the reason he's here cheering for Vietnam at the same time trying to sell his propaganda in here and pretending to cheer for USA since Viets have nothing to show for.

That's why I advocate bombing Vietnam again. They will love China long time again.

 

[Viet]

It's only a claim. China only ocupy feature that lies within it's EEZ.
Unlike Vietnam that occupies features in other countries EEZ.
Example Malaysia do not have much problem with China but Vietnam actually occupies 2 features within Malaysia's EEZ which are OUTSIDE Vietnam EEZ.

Eez isn’t related to which island or reef one country occupies. Learn the difference! Otherwise I can say you illegally occupy east Malaysia.

 

[gambit]

Sorry to disappoint you, but Lee Kuan Yew made sure the locals don't lose their connection with China.

Disappointed, me? Absolutely not. But in a way, Lee was right that since SG is so young, Singaporeans needs at least a nebulous ethnic tie to China as much as they need to be intellectually and emotionally distinct from Chinese.

As Americans would say...Here is the real deal...

There can be no 50/50 balance here between your ethnic tie and your cultural distinctiveness. Eventually, Singaporeans will emotionally move away from China. Even the Chinese realize what distance do to a people when there exist an old saying...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tian_gao,_Huangdi_yuan

Am sure you can translate better than wiki can.

But the point is clear that the longer you are apart from China time wise, the less the desire to be ANYTHING like Chinese. Just like the longer continental North America is politically apart from Great Britain, the less the desire to have anything -- other than history -- to do with Great Britain.

This has nothing to do with 'anti-China' propaganda as you tried to make it. It is human nature. You can move in and live with your parents but Singapore cannot move closer to China, physically and notionally. So me being right that your SG have a lot of 'bananas' is nothing 'unfortunate' but merely human nature. In one more generation, Singaporeans will see China the way Americans see Great Britain -- a vacation target.

 

[Nan Yang]

Eez isn’t related to which island or reef one country occupies. Learn the difference! Otherwise I can say you illegally occupy east Malaysia.

Please enlighten me.

 

[TheTruth]

Cham was very aggressive, she had continuously invaded and liked to attache Viet in to Chamkingom in our history, Cham had occupied Viet capital Hanoi. At the end, she paid for her mistake. There was history, like history of China related to Huno.
Apply your logic, USA can liberate Mongolian, Manchurian, Min Yue, Nan Yue, Tibetan from occupation of China.

Cham is very aggressive? but Vietnam has attacked every neighbor of hers.

 

[seesonic]

Disappointed, me? Absolutely not. But in a way, Lee was right that since SG is so young, Singaporeans needs at least a nebulous ethnic tie to China as much as they need to be intellectually and emotionally distinct from Chinese.

As Americans would say...Here is the real deal...

There can be no 50/50 balance here between your ethnic tie and your cultural distinctiveness. Eventually, Singaporeans will emotionally move away from China. Even the Chinese realize what distance do to a people when there exist an old saying...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tian_gao,_Huangdi_yuan

Am sure you can translate better than wiki can.

But the point is clear that the longer you are apart from China time wise, the less the desire to be ANYTHING like Chinese. Just like the longer continental North America is politically apart from Great Britain, the less the desire to have anything -- other than history -- to do with Great Britain.

This has nothing to do with 'anti-China' propaganda as you tried to make it. It is human nature. You can move in and live with your parents but Singapore cannot move closer to China, physically and notionally. So me being right that your SG have a lot of 'bananas' is nothing 'unfortunate' but merely human nature. In one more generation, Singaporeans will see China the way Americans see Great Britain -- a vacation target.

What kind of true Amercian travels overseas?

You try to hard

 

[cochine]

Cham is very aggressive? but Vietnam has attacked every neighbor of hers.

China and Champa had attacked in to our land first.

 

[Viet]

Please enlighten me.

Why Malaysia does not claim Guam is illegally occupied by the US because it lies outside Eez?
Fyi Vietnam possession of islands dated back to the Nguyen, long before Eez relating to UN sea convention was signed 1982.

 

[Nan Yang]

Why Malaysia does not claim Guam is illegally occupied by the US because it lies outside Eez?
Fyi Vietnam possession of islands dated back to the Nguyen, long before Eez relating to UN sea convention was signed 1982.

Because Guam is an island. The features you occupies are rocks. And those rocks are not inside your EEZ.

 

[Viet]

Because Guam is an island. The features you occupies are rocks. And those rocks are not inside your EEZ.

I get headache by your argument. You mean after signing to unclos, Vietnam shall hand over all of islands, or as rocks you call it, to other countries, although we occupy since centuries? We shall surrender our territories although we possess them long before a country called Malaya exists?

Have you ever considered to see a doc?

Haven’t you known that unclos only ruling on economic matter not on sovereign?

 

[sinait]

Bro, ignore those shallow losers. They don't know that nationality can be changed but one cannot change their ethnicity or race.
Gambit knows that. That's the reason he's here cheering for Vietnam at the same time trying to sell his propaganda in here and pretending to cheer for USA since Viets have nothing to show for.

He is Vietnamese Indian ethnicity(he said so himself), so he cheer for India as well.
And he claims ethnic ties are irrelevant.
.

 

[seesonic]

He is Vietnamese Indian ethnicity(he said so himself), so he cheer for India as well.
And he claims ethnic ties are irrelevant.
.

https://imgur.com/V0l2ZSW

 

[Nan Yang]

I get headache by your argument. You mean after signing to unclos, Vietnam shall hand over all of islands, or as rocks you call it, to other countries, although we occupy since centuries? We shall surrender our territories although we possess them long before a country called Malaya exists?

Have you ever considered to see a doc?

Haven’t you known that unclos only ruling on economic matter not on sovereign?

Yes according to UNCLOS. You cannot claim a rock. You can only claim an island. And with an island then you can claim the 200km EEZ.

As for sovereignty you still needs an island not a rock. In the Spraty there is only one feature that can be classified as a true island. Sovereignty is based almost 100 % on control. Do Vietnam control that island?