What's new

''Kayani feared condemning Guv murder may endanger army unity''

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anything that's against Pakistan, should and must look awesome to our neighbouring country. Its just natural. Please do not feel bad if you enjoy the book; for our forum members from our "friendly neighbourhood ........"

It is not against Pakistan. I never mentioned that the book is against Pakistan. The book analyses the US reconstruction effort in Afghanistan and its "War on Terror" . So, "friendly neighbour" get your facts right before you type.
 
It is not against Pakistan. I never mentioned that the book is against Pakistan. The book analyses the US reconstruction effort in Afghanistan and its "War on Terror" . So, "friendly neighbour" get your facts right before you type.

Ahmed Rashid tends to very anti Pakistan Army.

He also tends to exaggerate the situation and cling to too many conspiracy theories regarding the ISI/PA and militant organizations. His best work IMO remains the book Taliban.
 
Agnostic

Perhaps what most readers, especially our Indian and Afghan readers may not know about the intellectual and practical background of Mr. Rashid -- For 10 years Mr. Rashid was a armed guerrilla in Balouchistan and that was immediately after his pricey socialist education in the UK --- now after Mr. Rashid came to find himself in the "custody" of the ISI, he was "rehabilitated" into civil society.

Not taking anything from Mr. Rashid, he's an excellent journalist, but lets look at the larger view, so that we are also informed about the experiences that color or inform, the worldview Mr. Rashid projects.
 
''Kayani feared condemning Guv murder may endanger army unity''

New York, Mar 4 (PTI) Pakistan''s army chief Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, who had "declined" to publicly condemn the January killing of Punjab Governor Salmaan Taseer, had told Western envoys that there were "too many soldiers" in the ranks who "sympathised" with the assassin, a noted author has claimed.

For its part, the army has so far failed to express regret on either Minority Affairs Minister Shahbaz Bhatti''s murder or Taseer''s, Lahore-based author Ahmed Rashid, also a senior journalist, wrote in ''The New York Review of Books''.

Both Bhatti, the only Christian member of the Pakistani Cabinet, and Taseer were killed for opposing the controversial blasphemy law.
Kayani "declined to publicly condemn Taseer''s death or even to issue a public condolence to his family. He told Western ambassadors in January in Islamabad that there were too many soldiers in the ranks who sympathise with the killer," Rashid wrote.

The army chief showed the envoys "a scrapbook of photographs of Taseer''s killer being hailed as a hero by fellow police officers. Any public statement, he hinted, could endanger the army''s unity," Rashid said.

Behind this silence lies "something more sinister," he wrote. "For decades the army and the ISI have controlled the extremist groups, arming and training them in exchange for their continuing to serve as proxy forces in Afghanistan and Kashmir. But in recent years, the army has lost control of them and they are striking targets of their own."

"Yet the army has refused to help crack down on its rogue proteges � despite the fact that extremists have increasingly attacked the army and the ISI itself," Rashid said.

This is all the more ominous in view of the resources the military commands: half a million men, another half a million reserves, 110 nuclear arms, according to US media estimates, and one of the largest intelligence agencies in the world, the ISI, which has an estimated 100,000 employees, he noted.

"If the army has now surrendered any willingness to take on the extremists, the political establishment had already given up long ago," Rashid wrote.

President Asif Ali Zardari, the husband of slain PPP leader Benazir Bhutto, is no stranger to extremism himself and his populist base has traditionally voted for the party''s "anti-mullah, anti-army and pro-people policies," he said.

"Unfortunately those principles were abandoned by a series of corrupt and ineffectual leaders, and the PPP today is not even a shadow of what it once was," he said, while noting that Zardari has also "backtracked" on foreign policy goals such as improving relations with India and Afghanistan.

"The security agencies have unleashed Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) -- the largest and most feared extremist group in Pakistan, which was behind the 2008 Mumbai attacks -- on to the streets of Lahore," Rashid said.
"Right now Pakistan is becoming a place where there is an army without a country," he wrote.

''Kayani feared condemning Guv murder may endanger army unity'' - International News

Mr Kyani is not a political figure to make any kind of statements about the political activities:agree:...He is doing his duty he is meant to do instead to pose himself as a political juggler:azn:
 
To tell u the truth.. before we stepped into WOT ... Such concerns were there!??? Wat happened? we pulled it off didnt we??
P.S=Kayani is in a bad position.... Damned if he does... Damned if he doesnt!...

Moral of the story is tht he is not a politician but the leader of the army which has no concerns reguarding these issues.
Let the politicians do their shyt.
 
he ha gone nuts ...... ask writer to visit his physiologist properly otherwise he may get brain ham bridge because pakistan is not going to fall INSHALLAH whatever you write against pakistan or jawan of pakistan .....
 
this thread is retarded, as is the author......is it the Army chief's job to condemn political violence? That is outside his scope of duty and not part of his job description

what next? It's his job to condemn mobile-snatchers and wheat hoarders?

this is beyond the height of stupidity and mental retardation. The Army has nothing even remotely to do with the assassination or the investigation. If you want to talk about fear and cowardice, look @ zardari who didnt even attend the funeral of his own "friend"
 
Old thread AZ - as pointed out, it is not, and should not be, the Army's job to take positions on such issues.

The Army does reflect Pakistani society in that it is composed of soldiers and officers from that very society.

The social/religious/cultural changes and reforms needed here are the responsibility of the government, civil society, judiciary and the media - not the military.

When Pakistan's government, media and society find such acts condemnatory and are not afraid to speak out, then the issue of what the COAS thinks or does will be moot in any case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom