What's new

Katz: 'Assault in Iran is an option, Israel and Saudi Arabia have a common interest'

otack är världens lön! Go in peace brother!

I'm telling you the truth, Iran offered the deployment of ground forces in Iraq in 2014. Abadi rejected this, it is good he rejected otherwise we would've ended up in deep shit right now with the US aiding the Kurdish bastards to divide the country.

The war was fought by Iraqis, be it the army, police, ISOF or PMU. They are all our people, no foreigners were involved on direct-action on the ground
 
.
When Saddam suggested to crush the terrorists Shah replied ''I cant kill them, i am the Shah of this country, not somekind of evil coupdetat leader''.

What a mistake he did. He should have massacred all of those terrorists.
Exactly khomeini thugs massacred Iranian generals and politicians and opposition figures. They did what the so called dictator shah didn’t do at least he never excited people in huge numbers or send children to the front to clear mines.
 
.
I'm telling you the truth, Iran offered the deployment of ground forces in Iraq in 2014. Abadi rejected this, it is good he rejected otherwise we would've ended up in deep shit right now with the US aiding the Kurdish bastards to divide the country.
Bob bear described Iraq as the most xenophobic Arab country, so no surprise Iraq said no to Iranian ground forces. Iran knows this too, thats why Iran doesnt operate its direct military forces in Iraq visibly and easily to the public.

The war was fought by Iraqis, be it the army, police, ISOF or PMU. They are all our people, no foreigners were involved on direct-action on the ground
LMAO. now you want to steal Iran's credit. If the war was fought all by Iraqis then why was Iran needed to save Iraq from ISIS moving in on Baghdad? because Iraqis cant fight with good tactics, cohesion or formation! Iran provided the weapons and tactical guidance for the successful repulsion of ISIS. thats the truth and the historical facts. you're just warping it here.

Also, you say you are not waiting and you are just writing, so if this is so, why are you waiting for Iran to remove itself from Iraq then?
 
.
Bob bear described Iraq as the most xenophobic Arab country, so no surprise Iraq said no to Iranian ground forces. Iran knows this too, thats why Iran doesnt operate its direct military forces in Iraq visibly and easily to the public.


LMAO. now you want to steal Iran's credit. If the war was fought all by Iraqis then why was Iran needed to save Iraq from ISIS moving in on Baghdad? because Iraqis cant fight with good tactics, cohesion or formation! Iran provided the weapons and tactical guidance for the successful repulsion of ISIS. thats the truth and the historical facts. you're just warping it here.

Also, you say you are not waiting and you are just writing, so if this is so, why are you waiting for Iran to remove itself from Iraq then?

Every major operation was led and executed by ISOF, which has no ties to Iran. The PMU, their tactics were bad and costed many life's. The weapons were bought and paid for. I didn't deny Iranian role, I said only Iraqis fought on the ground.

As for Bob Beear, that research is from 2006. Iraq was isolated from the rest of the world through 1991 to 2003, and you come here with a 2006 statement whilst Iraq was in a civil war. No wonder they hated foreigners.
 
.
Pahlavi imitated the great kings of Iranian history like cyrus with crowns and ceremonies while being a vassal of another state.

The Islamic republic replicates the great kings of Iranian history by actually following their tactics. Bowing to no man/country and working tirelessly to rid Iran of foreign interference and create a strong independent state.

Koroush said even if the sky comes to my knees I will not bow, for I am the king of the world. Iranian government follows that model a lot more then vassal Pahlavi.
Don't think the first Pahlavi king cared too much about Ancient Iranian king. and the second Pahlavi only cared about them is long as he could use their name and rally people nationalistic spirit to his own gain otherwise he did not follow their methods that much . he only presented the Form but not the spirit
 
.
that delusional idiot thinks anybody religious or pro government is a terrorist in his book.

when I was young naïve and stupid I had the exact same beliefs as him.

all my problems was because of the government. I hated the religious restrictions and believed it to be foreign to Iranian culture. and desperatly wanted Iran to return to either a monarchy or western style "democracy"

Then I grew up, Became familiar with how geopolitics work. And came to the realization that this is the most Iranian /independent government we have had since the 1st Qajar.

Pahlavi imitated the great kings of Iranian history like cyrus with crowns and ceremonies while being a vassal of another state.

The Islamic republic replicates the great kings of Iranian history by actually following their tactics. Bowing to no man/country and working tirelessly to rid Iran of foreign interference and create a strong independent state.

Koroush said even if the sky comes to my knees I will not bow, for I am the king of the world. Iranian government follows that model a lot more then vassal Pahlavi.
He's got an absolute right to express his views & I have no problem with that what actually made me wonder was his conclusion at the end.
 
.
Don't think the first Pahlavi king cared too much about Ancient Iranian king. and the second Pahlavi only cared about them is long as he could use their name and rally people nationalistic spirit to his own gain otherwise he did not follow their methods that much . he only presented the Form but not the spirit
are, jumhoriye eslami kheyli tarikhe ghabl az eslam iran ro dust dare. hahahaha. boro dadash, boro poole now-saazi takhte jamshido baraye bibi zeynabet kharj kon khaarkosde haye arabparast.
 
Last edited:
.
are, jumhoriye eslami kheyli tarikhe ghabl az eslam iran ro dust dare. hahahaha. boro dadash, boro poole now-saazi takhte jamshido baraye bibi zeynabet kharj kon khaarkosde haye arabparast.
Don't think so . but as I said that was also the case about Pahlavi.

By the way whoever I'm and whatever I worship at least I'm polite and never lower myself to the levels you just brought yourself.
 
.
Don't think so . but as I said that was also the case about Pahlavi.
Pahlavi ham mashad o makke miraft. vali baz ham tarikhe iran ro faramush nemikard.
dar kol iran az zamane nader shah rahbare khoobi nadare.
 
. . .
awesome conquerer
But failed to embed what he conquered into one country after his death all his work get destroyed and did not even last for one generation .hi was not a good king but he was an extraordinary general.
 
.
But failed to embed what he conquered into one country after his death all his work get destroyed and did not even last for one generation .hi was not a good king but he was an extraordinary general.
We need someone like him, temporary. To get rid of the corrupt people. Mass execution of traitors.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom