What's new

Kashmiri Editor SHUJAAT "SILENCED", day after supporting UN HR report

Mukti Bahini was demanded by East Pakistan and it was just trained to counter the spill over of what was happening then. West Pakistan forced them to liberate themselves and Indian role wasn't their until Bengalis started crossing border.
well, then kashmir demands Pakistani force there and Let(lashkar-e-tayyaba) in kashmir after what you have create a mess there so should we attack you?
Ok now for 1 second keep Kashmir aside and bring your seven sisters state in the case after what you are doing there..should Pakistan consider to enter in those states or create a resistive force like Mukhti bahini to seprate them from india and same goes for khalistan
 
. .
Again, not true.

1965 - your Army crossed into Rann of Kutch in 1965 Jan first. It also launched Gibraltar and crossed the LoC.
Operations at LOC were going since 1947, this was not an international border. India attacked Pakistani border in the darkness of the night on 6 September 1965

India's own prime minister Modi boasted that he was one if the mukti terrorists who carried out operations in East Pakistan
well, then kashmir demands Pakistani force there and Let(lashkar-e-tayyaba) in kashmir after what you have create a mess there so should we attack you?
Ok now for 1 second keep Kashmir aside and bring your seven sisters state in the case after what you are doing there..should Pakistan consider to enter in those states or create a resistive force like Mukhti bahini to seprate them from india and same goes for khalistan

well, then kashmir demands Pakistani force there and Let(lashkar-e-tayyaba) in kashmir after what you have create a mess there so should we attack you?
Ok now for 1 second keep Kashmir aside and bring your seven sisters state in the case after what you are doing there..should Pakistan consider to enter in those states or create a resistive force like Mukhti bahini to seprate them from india and same goes for khalistan
If mukti Bahini action was correct then laskat e taiba is also correct in the same light
 
.
Operations at LOC were going since 1947, this was not an international border. India attacked Pakistani border in the darkness of the night on 6 September 1965

India's own prime minister Modi boasted that he was one if the mukti terrorists who carried out operations in East Pakistan



If mukti Bahini action was correct then laskat e taiba is also correct in the same light

lol ...................then carry on and wait to face another shimla accord .

well, then kashmir demands Pakistani force there and Let(lashkar-e-tayyaba) in kashmir after what you have create a mess there so should we attack you?
Ok now for 1 second keep Kashmir aside and bring your seven sisters state in the case after what you are doing there..should Pakistan consider to enter in those states or create a resistive force like Mukhti bahini to seprate them from india and same goes for khalistan

come with all of your army any where in india you are welcome .


Operations at LOC were going since 1947, this was not an international border. India attacked Pakistani border in the darkness of the night on 6 September 1965

India's own prime minister Modi boasted that he was one if the mukti terrorists who carried out operations in East Pakistan



If mukti Bahini action was correct then laskat e taiba is also correct in the same light



world does not think in the same way as pakistanis want them to think .
that is why you are being black listed at FATF
 
.
Indians have policy that tell the world a Lie so many times that world start believing it is a truth. And when you do terrorism and human violations either start blaming others or start crying that you are a victim...that is the Indian Policy...
 
.
Indians have policy that tell the world a Lie so many times that world start believing it is a truth. And when you do terrorism and human violations either start blaming others or start crying that you are a victim...that is the Indian Policy...

Weren't you(Govt of Pak) lying about Osama bin Laden that he is not in Pakistan but was found in Pakistan. And later on you lied about Ajmal Kasab that he is not a Pakistani but from his village in Pakistan, every one recognized him. And after 10 years, Nawaz Shareef confessed that there were people from government involved in Mumbai. :laughcry:
 
.
Operations at LOC were going since 1947, this was not an international border. India attacked Pakistani border in the darkness of the night on 6 September 1965

India's own prime minister Modi boasted that he was one if the mukti terrorists who carried out operations in East Pakistan



If mukti Bahini action was correct then laskat e taiba is also correct in the same light

Nope. Again, another blatant lie. There had been a UN mandated ceasefire in Kashmir. What is known as the LoC today (since Shimla Agreement) was then known as the Ceasefire Line. Pakistan violated the ceasefire and the ceasefire line by crossing it.

Also, you sidestepped the fact that Pakistan crossed the IB in January 1965 in the Rann of Kutch incident.

Modi was one? When did he ever say that? Don't make stuff up.
 
. .
listen
Nope. Again, another blatant lie. There had been a UN mandated ceasefire in Kashmir. What is known as the LoC today (since Shimla Agreement) was then known as the Ceasefire Line. Pakistan violated the ceasefire and the ceasefire line by crossing it.

Also, you sidestepped the fact that Pakistan crossed the IB in January 1965 in the Rann of Kutch incident.

Modi was one? When did he ever say that? Don't make stuff up.
Listen to his confession with your own ears.

Nope. Again, another blatant lie. There had been a UN mandated ceasefire in Kashmir. What is known as the LoC today (since Shimla Agreement) was then known as the Ceasefire Line. Pakistan violated the ceasefire and the ceasefire line by crossing it.

Also, you sidestepped the fact that Pakistan crossed the IB in January 1965 in the Rann of Kutch incident.

Modi was one? When did he ever say that? Don't make stuff up.
Run of kuch was and is disputed to date.


lol ...................then carry on and wait to face another shimla accord .



come with all of your army any where in india you are welcome .







world does not think in the same way as pakistanis want them to think .
that is why you are being black listed at FATF


In entire recorded human history no army attacking from West on India has been defeated so far. Next time again we will cut through India like a hot knife goes through butter. You will not be laughing then.
 
.
listen

Listen to his confession with your own ears.


Run of kuch was and is disputed to date.





In entire recorded human history no army attacking from West on India has been defeated so far. Next time again we will cut through India like a hot knife goes through butter. You will not be laughing then.
Of course Indian forces fought with Mukti Bahini - who do you think accepted your surrender and whom did your forces surrender to? How is this new? And where did he say he personally went there? Listen to it again.

Rann of Kutch is not disputed. Don't type anything just for the sake of it.
 
.
Of course Indian forces fought with Mukti Bahini - who do you think accepted your surrender and whom did your forces surrender to? How is this new? And where did he say he personally went there? Listen to it again.

Rann of Kutch is not disputed. Don't type anything just for the sake of it.
the point is that you fought along Mukhti Bahini and break a country which is against the charters of UN.
and what are you proud of? 150k indian soldiers+100k mukhti bahini=250k forces against 30k Pakistani troops with no assistance due to many reasons like we didn't have enough ammunation to fight and we needed time to transfer the ammunation from west to east so what you did in 1971 is that you show the world that how coward you are by attacking the weak point because you didn't and still don't possess enough balls to attack the strong side..
You are being deluded by your pathological liar society that you will create some stupid akand bharat which your politicians show you dream of but that's just a dream my 'indiot' friend so wake up!!
you couldn't fight the so called terrorists of kashmir which are hardly 250 as said by your government
your 700k soldiers couldn't win against these so called 250 terrorists and you dream of defeating us..
 
.
the point is that you fought along Mukhti Bahini and break a country which is against the charters of UN.
and what are you proud of? 150k indian soldiers+100k mukhti bahini=250k forces against 30k Pakistani troops with no assistance due to many reasons like we didn't have enough ammunation to fight and we needed time to transfer the ammunation from west to east so what you did in 1971 is that you show the world that how coward you are by attacking the weak point because you didn't and still don't possess enough balls to attack the strong side..
You are being deluded by your pathological liar society that you will create some stupid akand bharat which your politicians show you dream of but that's just a dream my 'indiot' friend so wake up!!
you couldn't fight the so called terrorists of kashmir which are hardly 250 as said by your government
your 700k soldiers couldn't win against these so called 250 terrorists and you dream of defeating us..
Indian victory in East Pakistan was a wrong lesson to Indian nation, India attacked east Pakistan with a overwhelming majority of 12:1 on ground and 15:1 in the air which was not only a mismatch but also unfair. Nonetheless Pakistan army wrote new chapters in courage and bravery while fighting the enemies outside and traitors inside. We would be damned if we committed those mistakes again, I think after 1971 a new Pakistan has emerged which is more self reliant and indepedent than pre 71 whereby we kept waiting for 7th US fleet to rescue us.
 
.
the point is that you fought along Mukhti Bahini and break a country which is against the charters of UN.
and what are you proud of? 150k indian soldiers+100k mukhti bahini=250k forces against 30k Pakistani troops with no assistance due to many reasons like we didn't have enough ammunation to fight and we needed time to transfer the ammunation from west to east so what you did in 1971 is that you show the world that how coward you are by attacking the weak point because you didn't and still don't possess enough balls to attack the strong side..
You are being deluded by your pathological liar society that you will create some stupid akand bharat which your politicians show you dream of but that's just a dream my 'indiot' friend so wake up!!
you couldn't fight the so called terrorists of kashmir which are hardly 250 as said by your government
your 700k soldiers couldn't win against these so called 250 terrorists and you dream of defeating us..

Indian victory in East Pakistan was a wrong lesson to Indian nation, India attacked east Pakistan with a overwhelming majority of 12:1 on ground and 15:1 in the air which was not only a mismatch but also unfair. Nonetheless Pakistan army wrote new chapters in courage and bravery while fighting the enemies outside and traitors inside. We would be damned if we committed those mistakes again, I think after 1971 a new Pakistan has emerged which is more self reliant and indepedent than pre 71 whereby we kept waiting for 7th US fleet to rescue us.

Learn from the UK who defended even a small island like the Falklands.

East Pakistan housed 55% of your population. Also over 10 million refugees poured into India - go youtube "East Pakistani refugees in India" for videos from your SEATO and CENTO allies.

Against the charter of the UN? Which article? In case you have forgotten or not read, in 1971 - on Dec 3, 1971 it was Pak which launched air strikes against India first.

Books are your friends. Read them.
 
.
Learn from the UK who defended even a small island like the Falklands.

East Pakistan housed 55% of your population. Also over 10 million refugees poured into India - go youtube "East Pakistani refugees in India" for videos from your SEATO and CENTO allies.

Against the charter of the UN? Which article? In case you have forgotten or not read, in 1971 - on Dec 3, 1971 it was Pak which launched air strikes against India first.

Books are your friends. Read them.
I don't prefer to read the books based on subjective feelings and mostly are written by indians. My book is internet and my words are based on facts and yes,we believe that india won 1971 war but by cowardness.Sorry can't post links because i'm not a senior member..
minimum 29 posts required to post a link and
50 posts for a senior member i think..
don't forget in the same 1971 war PAF secured a world record of knocking out 5 of your jets in a little time..
 
.
I don't prefer to read the books based on subjective feelings and mostly are written by indians. My book is internet and my words are based on facts and yes,we believe that india won 1971 war but by cowardness.Sorry can't post links because i'm not a senior member..
minimum 29 posts required to post a link and
50 posts for a senior member i think..
don't forget in the same 1971 war PAF secured a world record of knocking out 5 of your jets in a little time..
Then I strongly recommend reading the book "The rape of Bangla Desh" by Pakistani author Anthony Mascarhenas.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom