What's new

Kashmir | News & Discussions.

So, is new media only reinforcing old stereotypes?


  • Total voters
    44
Instead of all the above reasons i think one reason is enough, Kashmir doesn't belong to India and Pakistan has every reason to have concern for it. Now you make your theories but the fact doesn't change that Pakistan consider Kashmir to be disputed territory and would continue to support Kashmiri no matter how many times you repeat the rant of integral part.

Oh those aren't my theories sweety, UN agreed if anybody has a legal stance on Kashmir its India. You got an issue, take it up with UN. Oh, btw Pakistan was at the table when these negotiations occured.


[
Who says? Bharat? Not acceptable.

No. its the UN. Aren't you the cheerleaders for the UN resolutions, when the UN asked for full withdrawal of Pakistani forces but let the Indian forces remain, it was confirmation that Pakistan has no right on Kashmir.


I think this is all BS. Until end the rant of integral part of India it doesn't matter whether Pakistan has control of AJK or not. Once you accept IOK as a a part of disputed territory you have the right to accuse us of "illegally" occupying AJK.

:)

Well looking up to India to establish standards eh, why don't you make some of your own, and until then get off the high horse of "Illegal Indian Occupation".
 
.
Instead of all the above reasons i think one reason is enough, Kashmir doesn't belong to India and Pakistan has every reason to have concern for it. Now you make your theories but the fact doesn't change that Pakistan consider Kashmir to be disputed territory and would continue to support Kashmiri no matter how many times you repeat the rant of integral part.

:)

Why do you consider Integral part comments as a rant.?
 
.
Oh those aren't my theories sweety, UN agreed if anybody has a legal stance on Kashmir its India. You got an issue, take it up with UN. Oh, btw Pakistan was at the table when these negotiations occured.

India doesn't even had the Geographical border with Kashmir let alone it's claim on Kashmir. The legality was abolished by India by it's occupation of Gordaspur to "create" geographical relation of IOK with India.

No. its the UN. Aren't you the cheerleaders for the UN resolutions, when the UN asked for full withdrawal of Pakistani forces but let the Indian forces remain, it was confirmation that Pakistan has no right on Kashmir.

We couldn't let India occupy AJK and we had and have no trust in India. The accession by the raja was illegal in every sense of the word and once India do something "practical" for the occurrence of plebiscite we can't remove our forces from AJK. Even if their was any chance for the removal of forces from Kashmir than India itself made that chance negligible by claiming Kashmir to be it's territory.

Well looking up to India to establish standards eh, why don't you make some of your own, and until then get off the high horse of "Illegal Indian Occupation".

Sorry Buddy, standards go side by side with India. Accept IOK as a disputed territory than you have the legality to accuse Pakistan of "occupying" AJK.

:)
 
. .
Pakistan: Kashmir is the core issue
India: no, it is part of a set of issues.

Let us agree to dis-agree. That is it. This argument will not go anywhere.

If Kashmir issue is some how magically settled the animosity between India and Pakistan will not end.

We will still be Kaffirs, Zaid Hamid will be the still popular with his Radio Pakistan in New Delhi thing..

let us not kid our self.. there is no point beating a dead horse ..
 
.
India doesn't even had the Geographical border with Kashmir let alone it's claim on Kashmir. The legality was abolished by India by it's occupation of Gordaspur to "create" geographical relation of IOK with India.

:)

Buy a map, get an education and stop wasting my time.
 
.
Buy a map, get an education and stop wasting my time.

And we have the map and we have the history. And the best thing is we also have Kashmiris revolting against your illegitimate occupation.
 
.
No use for these statements.

Kashmir will be one of 28 states of India for ever.

PERIOD.

If Pakistan wants the Indian part then they can take it only by force, in that case viceversa is also possible. The ball is in Pakistan's court.
 
. . .
Pakistan calls for US help to settle Kashmir

NEW YORK – Pakistan on Tuesday urged the United States to pressure India into settling the core issue of Kashmir between India and Pakistan amid a popular revolt in the disputed state by the oppressed people against Indian occupation.


“The occupation cannot continue. The rights of the Kashmiri people cannot continue to be denied,” Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said at the Council on Foreign Relations, a think-tank.
His strong statement came on a day the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon also broke his silence on the explosive situation, calling for an immediate end to violence in the Occupied Kashmir where Indian security forces have killed more than 100 freedom-seeking protestors.


Qureshi said the ongoing clashes showed that India and not Pakistan was to blame for the uprising Kashmir where army troops have been enforcing a 24-hour curfew.
On a visit to New York for a UN General Assembly session, the Foreign Minister reaffirmed his Government’s desire of peace with India denounced New Delhi’s rule in Kashmir as “oppression.”
The Foreign Minister’s sharp remarks came ahead of his expected meeting with Indian External Affairs Minister SM Krishna, who arrived in New York On Tuesday.

“The international community must recognise that the people of Kashmir, in an entirely indigenous upsurge, are demanding their right to self-determination,” Qureshi said while rejecting allegations that Pakistan was behind the revolt against New Delhi’s rule.
Stressing that the uprising in the Occupied Kashmir was indigenous, he said Pakistan has neither the means nor the capacity to mobilise the young and old to stage protest demonstrations and shut down towns and cities.

Although Qureshi covered a number of topics, he made the most detailed statement so far on the Kashmir dispute. He urged India to take a “fresh look” at the evolving situation in the territory and sit down with Pakistan in an effort to resolve the festering dispute. “Dialogue is the only way forward ..We can do it.”


Pakistan calls for US help to settle Kashmir | Pakistan | News | Newspaper | Daily | English | Online
 
.
India doesn't even had the Geographical border with Kashmir let alone it's claim on Kashmir. The legality was abolished by India by it's occupation of Gordaspur to "create" geographical relation of IOK with India.
:)

Pakistan was also "created". It was never a country, let alone its claim on Kashmir. And we do accept the lagality of Pakistan as an independent country. Enough goodwill already done on our part, time for you to reciprocate now.
 
.
Americans would never do that , we will . Its in their extreme favor to keep us fighting and keep Lockheed martin , Boeing and others getting our arms contracts.

They know if the kashmir issue is resolved then Pakistan and India will become allies , our borders would be opened , there would be trade happening all over the place our people would be well off and Pakistan would help India to solve their issues with china and by having done that America as a sole super power wont be the only one . Eu wont be the only union , do you see my points benny?
 
.
Pakistan was also "created". It was never a country, let alone its claim on Kashmir. And we do accept the lagality of Pakistan as an independent country. Enough goodwill already done on our part, time for you to reciprocate now.

We have also done our part of reciprocation by accepting India's occupation of Gurdaspur, Hyderabad and Junagadh.Can't do it for IOK. Sorry.

:)
 
.
We have also done our part of reciprocation by accepting India's occupation of Gurdaspur, Hyderabad and Junagadh.Can't do it for IOK. Sorry.

:)

Kindly do it atleast for P..O..K. then. Declare it as an Independent country in UN, and we may follow.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom