When you talk about "feasibility" i assume your talking about the feasibility from a pakistani point of view of backing the freedom struggle?
When I said about feasibility I meant feasibility of taking away Kashmir from India, not just keeping the world's attention, using your so called freedom fighters.
Politically on the international scene the fighting keeps the issue of kashmir as being a nuclear flashpoint firmly in peoples mind and the pressure that goes with finding a settlement.
I was of the opinion that the Pakistan supports and gives away its own comman man (what I mean by comman man = normal citizen, not a uniformed person) life for gaining Kashmir, never thought this approach is just to keep reminding the world about this problem. And even this keeping the world's attention doesn't seem to give the expected results for you. The world simply says have bilateral talk, nobody comes to mediate at all. Pakistan tried to invite U.S., China for this talk about Kashmir with India but they simply denied. So the world attention does not yield the expected result for you, so why bother sending your own citizen for getting killed accross the border ?
If thats the case then it is totally feasible for pakistan to back a small number of fighters to keep hundreds of thousands indian army pinned down while at the same time on the expenditure side the ratio spent on keeping the indian army in kashmir will be a lot higher then keeping a freedom fighter fighting.
Expenditure ratio ? Never bother this is our country, if we think of checks and balances and leave one part of our land to other country, then the whole nation will loose moral, and that will pave the way for separatists to start operations everywhere, so this is not about check and balance for us. And the main thing is we cannot give our own citizens and thier land to other country for anything, anything at all, so it is not checks and balances for us, it is about protecting our people and their land. You can have your own views that we actually don't protect but we oppress, and I will not argue about that because nobody ever came to any conclusion about that in this forum. I am only interested in knowing whether Pakistan gives the correct respect to its so called freedom fighters, and feasibility of using this approach to take Kashmir away from India. About the feasibility I have got your answer that it is not to take away Kashmir, but Pakistan slays its own Comman Man's life just to keep the world's attention on Kashmir. Only question which is still open is whether Pakistan gives the correct respect to its so called freedom fighters.
And whats going to happen then?....will you suddenly start thinking that there "morally" right?
Yes, please assume good faith, if you prove irrefutably I will surely believe. At present I still think Pakistan is morally bankrupt.
I totally agree that lack of eductaion can lead to manipulation but so can revenge or other emotions that can be played up on....nationalistic patriotism is another.
Thanks for agreeing with me about the manipulation. May be the terrorists are having a misaligned belief about patriotism and Pakistan manipulates them without giving them their due respects (as in galentary awards, compensation as same as your army gets etc). Pakistan simply manipulates their misplaced patriotism for its own gain without giving anything. This is much more serious than violating someone's civil rights.
Note :- The misplaced patriotism of the terrorists is our point of view, there is no need for you to refute this, you can simply disagree. The main point of discussion is whether Pakistan really gives them due respects or simply manipulates ?
I think Pakistan manipulates the uneducated people, and hence it is morally bankrupt.
@MODS :- Somebody has changed my location info and my signature, please look into this, I logged in today only and for the past two days I did not log in, and I today I logged in about 10:30 AM KST.
you wanna play lets play
apna poora desh bacha lo naxals sey phir aa ker yahan tamak toyiaan marna miyaan 
