Karachi will be part of India one day,We believe in 'Akhand Bharat' : BJP

[masterchief_mirza]

How funny your ignorance can get
Educated illustrate precisely .
Don't you know Bargis and pindaris were Muslims , dont stick those creepy barbarians with Marathas.
Marathas who in later stage had to convert most of the bargi and pindari tribes to Hinduism, to get them civilized.

Wasn't for free ,
Jaziya is the word, we had to pay this dirty tax. plus sacrifice our bravehearts to save the temples,
Still freaky Aurangzeb destroy sacred kashi, mathura and ayodhya , which are prime examples of tyranny of the indigenous people by the cruel invaders.

Oh bhai, jizya was an excellent idea. Did you pay zakat btw? If you dodge zakat then pay jizya. Simples. No government likes tax evaders.

 

[LimaCharlie]

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

• We believe in 'Akhand Bharat' and we believe that one day Karachi will be part of India: Fadnavis
• Region from Azad Kashmir to Gilgit-Baltistan is an integral part of India: Rajnath Singh
• The Parliament has also passed resolution that Azad Kashmir is part of India

New Delhi: In a strong pitch for ‘Akhand Bharat’, former Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis said one day Karachi will be part of India.

Fadnavis gave this statement to PTI when he was asked about an incident in Mumbai where a Shiv Sena worker asked the owner of a sweet shop to drop the word ‘Karachi’ from the shop’s name because it is a Pakistani city.

We believe in ‘Akhand Bharat’ (undivided India) and we believe that one day Karachi will be part of India, he had said.

We believe in ‘Akhand Bharat’: Fadnavis
On Thursday, an activist from Shiv Sena ordered the owner of the reputed Karachi Sweets in Bandra to change its name to something more Indian or Marathi.

Embarrassed by the incident Shiv Sena’s Sanjay Raut made it clear that it was not the “official stand” of the party.





"Karachi Sweets and Karachi Bakery have been in Mumbai for 60 years. They have nothing to do with Pakistan. It makes no sense to ask for changing their names now...It's not the Shiv Sena's official stance," Raut said.

Earlier this month, Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh called the region from Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir) to Gilgit-Baltistan an integral part of India adding that it’s under the illegal occupation of Pakistan currently.

Azad Kashmir under Pakistan's illegal occupation: Rajnath Singh
Taking to Twitter Singh said: “Gilgit-Baltistan is under illegal occupation by Pakistan and is now going to make it a state on which our government has said in two words that from Azad Kashmir to Gilgit-Baltistan is an integral part of India.”

The Defence Minister had earlier said that the Modi government will change the face of Jammu and Kashmir with its development works so much that people from Azad Kashmir will demand to be part of India.

Earlier, the Parliament has also passed a resolution that Azad Kashmir is part of India.

We believe in 'Akhand Bharat', Karachi will be part of India one day: BJP's Devendra Fadnavis

Former Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said one day Pakistan’s Karachi will be part of India.

www.timesnownews.com

Must be a real toxic kind of cow urine they're drunk on...

 

[masterchief_mirza]

"In 1741, the cavalry of Raghoji Bhosle, the Maratha ruler of Nagpur, started to pillage western Bengal under the command of Bhaskar Pandit. Bengalis called these Marathas “Bargis” which is a corruption of the Marathi word, "bargir" (etymology: Persian) which means “light cavalry”."

Let me know where you see Muslims in the above..

Forgotten Indian history: The brutal Maratha invasions of Bengal

For medieval India history, incidents that don't fit into an overarching Hindu versus Muslim narrative tend to be removed from popular discourse. The 1741 Maratha invasion of Bengal is one such example.

www.google.com

Or any Muslims here?

"Bajirao and the Marathas campaigned for one thing alone, and it was called chauth. It meant a fourth of all revenue from other kingdoms, no matter what the faith of king and subject, and at collecting this Bajirao and the rest were efficient.
Maratha extortion caused Jaipur’s Ishwari Singh to commit suicide in December 1750. Sir Jadunath Sarkar (the Manmohan Desai of our historians) writes of what followed in his four-volume classic, Fall of the Mughal Empire: “On 10 January, some 4,000 Marathas entered Jaipur… (and) despising the helpless condition of a king propped up by their arms, seemed to have behaved towards Jaipur as a city taken by storm. Suddenly the pent-up hatred of the Rajputs burst forth; a riot broke out at noon, and the citizens attacked the unsuspecting Marathas. For nine hours slaughter and pillage raged.” "

Hindu-Hindu violence is so sad. No wonder saffronists omit these bits from their glorious history of the Maratha empire conferences.

Worth noting that the Nawab of Bengal - a Muslim - was trying to protect his Hindu subjects from Maratha brutality during their raids.

 

[suyog chavan]

Oh bhai, jizya was an excellent idea. Did you pay zakat btw? If you dodge zakat then pay jizya. Simples. No government likes tax evaders.

Excellent idea my foot,
So you telling the greedy Mughals having mercy on Hindus is a practical joke bluff isn't it??
So basically Mughals ditched Islam for money is what your are indirectly conveying

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Excellent idea my foot,
So you telling the greedy Mughals having mercy on Hindus is a practical joke bluff isn't it??

I'm not joking at all. Why should Muslims pay Zakat as a mandatory tax handed to the state, and non-Muslims dodge this tax? It's straightforward social security. Muslims pay Zakat. You idolaters pay jizya. The tax man is happy.

 

[suyog chavan]

I'm not joking at all. Why should Muslims pay Zakat as a mandatory tax handed to the state, and non-Muslims dodge this tax? It's straightforward social security. Muslims pay Zakat. You idolaters pay jizya. The tax man is happy.

This didn't score well with the secular Mughals then , maybe

afsir(interpretation)

Jalal - Al-Jalalayn

Then, when the sacred months have passed — that is, [at] the end of the period of deferment — slay the idolaters wherever you find them, be it during a lawful [period] or a sacred [one], and take them, captive, and confine them, to castles and forts, until they have no choice except [being put to] death or [acceptance of] Islam; and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush, [at every] route that they use (kulla, ‘every’, is in the accusative because a [preceding] genitive-taking preposition has been removed). But if they repent, of unbelief, and establish prayer and pay the alms, then leave their way free, and do not interfere with them. God is Forgiving, Merciful, to those who repent.

Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled

Surah At-Tawbah [9:29]

Tafsir(interpretation)

Jalal - Al-Jalalayn

Fight those who do not believe in God, nor in the Last Day, for, otherwise, they would have believed in the Prophet (s), and who do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden, such as wine, nor do they practise the religion of truth, the firm one, the one that abrogated other religions, namely, the religion of Islam — from among of those who (min, ‘from’, explains [the previous] alladhīna, ‘those who’) have been given the Scripture, namely, the Jews and the Christians, until they pay the jizya tribute, the annual tax imposed them, readily (‘an yadin is a circumstantial qualifier, meaning, ‘compliantly’, or ‘by their own hands’, not delegating it [to others to pay]), being subdued, [being made] submissive and compliant to the authority of Islam.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

This didn't score well with the secular Mughals then , maybe

afsir(interpretation)

Jalal - Al-Jalalayn

Then, when the sacred months have passed — that is, [at] the end of the period of deferment — slay the idolaters wherever you find them, be it during a lawful [period] or a sacred [one], and take them, captive, and confine them, to castles and forts, until they have no choice except [being put to] death or [acceptance of] Islam; and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush, [at every] route that they use (kulla, ‘every’, is in the accusative because a [preceding] genitive-taking preposition has been removed). But if they repent, of unbelief, and establish prayer and pay the alms, then leave their way free, and do not interfere with them. God is Forgiving, Merciful, to those who repent.

Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled

Surah At-Tawbah [9:29]

Tafsir(interpretation)

Jalal - Al-Jalalayn

Fight those who do not believe in God, nor in the Last Day, for, otherwise, they would have believed in the Prophet (s), and who do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden, such as wine, nor do they practise the religion of truth, the firm one, the one that abrogated other religions, namely, the religion of Islam — from among of those who (min, ‘from’, explains [the previous] alladhīna, ‘those who’) have been given the Scripture, namely, the Jews and the Christians, until they pay the jizya tribute, the annual tax imposed them, readily (‘an yadin is a circumstantial qualifier, meaning, ‘compliantly’, or ‘by their own hands’, not delegating it [to others to pay]), being subdued, [being made] submissive and compliant to the authority of Islam.

Blah blah. Where does it say Hindus can dodge paying social security while Muslims must continue to do so?

I pay Zakat. You pay jizya. Enjoy usage of our public services, roads and universal healthcare.

Why so keen to dodge taxes which you expect Muslims to pay btw? I'm beginning to wonder if you're a Gujarati.

 

[M.AsfandYar]

View attachment 690081




@Indos you better start learning Hindi Bro, They're coming to liberate Bali.


Also start practicing the head bobble, It's essential for smooth integration.... here's a reference GIF for your benefit.


View attachment 690086

I am always amazed by this head bobble...
How do they even speak while doing that? Its impossible and tiring.

 

[suyog chavan]

Blah blah. Where does it say Hindus can dodge paying social security while Muslims must continue to do so?

I pay Zakat. You pay jizya. Enjoy usage of our public services, roads and universal healthcare.

Why so keen to dodge taxes which you expect Muslims to pay btw? I'm beginning to wonder if you're a Gujarati.

LOL,
you are comparing jaziya with zakat is such an imbecile act,
Hindus had to pay regular taxes plus jaziya ,unlike Muslims in the secular(so called) Mughal regime.

Mughal emperor Aurangzeb drew poverty line first | Ahmedabad News - Times of India

It was in 1679 that Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb ordered for the division of Hindus into rich, middle and poor classes to impose the Islamic ‘jizya tax’ o

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

 

[DalalErMaNodi]

I am always amazed by this head bobble...
How do they even speak while doing that? Its impossible and tiring.

The ones who bobble their heads, Talk alot, especially among themselves, usually while eye molesting other brown people nearby and making some comment in their own language, to which the others add more spice and then all bobble together.



It's ceremonious like eastern tea ceremonies, they're all in agreement when the head bobbles.




Bobber #1 : Da (like oyye, used to draw attention), This shoe would look good on you.


Bobber #2 : Not really, It is one size too small for me.


Bobber #3 : That's what she said.... *Snickers*




All : Bobble en masse.




The end.

 

[suyog chavan]

Blah blah. Where does it say Hindus can dodge paying social security while Muslims must continue to do so?

I pay Zakat. You pay jizya. Enjoy usage of our public services, roads and universal healthcare.

Why so keen to dodge taxes which you expect Muslims to pay btw? I'm beginning to wonder if you're a Gujarati.

Here goes you theory of "Why so keen to dodge taxes which you expect Muslims to pay btw" into the gutter.

In Kashmir, Sikandar Butshikan levied both jizya and zakat on Hindus. Ahmad Shah (1411-1442), a ruler of Gujarat, introduced the Jizyah in 1414 and collected it with such strictness that many people converted to Islam to evade it.

Jizya was later abolished by the third Mughal emperor Akbar, in 1579. However, Aurangzeb, the sixth emperor, through his compilation of Fatawa-e-Alamgiri, re-introduced and levied jizya on non-Muslims in 1679, and even monks and beggars were not exempted. The jizya rate was more than twice the zakat tax rate paid by Muslims, which led to mass civil protests of 1679 in India. In some areas revolts led to its periodic suspension such as the 1704 AD suspension of jizya in Deccan region of India by Aurangzeb.

I Believe you are Pakistani for sure. lol

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Here goes you theory of "Why so keen to dodge taxes which you expect Muslims to pay btw" into the gutter.

In Kashmir, Sikandar Butshikan levied both jizya and zakat on Hindus. Ahmad Shah (1411-1442), a ruler of Gujarat, introduced the Jizyah in 1414 and collected it with such strictness that many people converted to Islam to evade it.

Jizya was later abolished by the third Mughal emperor Akbar, in 1579. However, Aurangzeb, the sixth emperor, through his compilation of Fatawa-e-Alamgiri, re-introduced and levied jizya on non-Muslims in 1679, and even monks and beggars were not exempted. The jizya rate was more than twice the zakat tax rate paid by Muslims, which led to mass civil protests of 1679 in India. In some areas revolts led to its periodic suspension such as the 1704 AD suspension of jizya in Deccan region of India by Aurangzeb.

I Believe you are Pakistani for sure. lol

Have you seen Hindu temples recently? How much do you think it costs to maintain those pornographic sculptures? Quite a bit. So when muslim rulers rightly demand you pay for such religion-specific upkeep, no point protesting. Simple tax evasion should not be tolerated. No special favours for Hindus. If your public services are more expensive, you will pay more.
"Muslim jurists required adult, free, sane males among the dhimma community to pay the jizya,[4] while exempting women, children, elders, handicapped, the ill, the insane, monks, hermits, slaves,[5][6][7][8][9] and musta'mins—non-Muslim foreigners who only temporarily reside in Muslim lands.[5][10] Dhimmis who chose to join military service were also exempted from payment,[1][6][11][12][13] as were those who could not afford to pay.[6][14][15]"

If you wusses want Muslims to defend your lands but be exempt from military service yourselves, you should certainly pay additional tax.

It was hard work for the Muslim army of the Nawab of Bengal fighting off Hindu Maratha hordes (as I explained to you above) to protect his Hindu subjects. You think those Hindus shouldn't have paid for the service?

Tax evasion disgusts me.

 

[suyog chavan]

Have you seen Hindu temples recently? How much do you think it costs to maintain those pornographic sculptures? Quite a bit. So when muslim rulers rightly demand you pay for such religion-specific upkeep, no point protesting. Simple tax evasion should not be tolerated. No special favours for Hindus. If your public services are more expensive, you will pay more.

Only a fool would say this,
nevertheless Jaziya tax was levied not to maintain temples But rather for being a Hindu or Non Muslim.
i.e pay tax or convert to Islam or die
BTW isn't maintaining temples haram in islam,
ooh no no greedy Mughals .

Islamic activists halt construction of first Hindu temple in Islamabad

Petitions filed in court to block work on first Hindu temple in capital since Pakistan’s creation

www.theguardian.com

Have you seen Hindu temples recently? How much do you think it costs to maintain those pornographic sculptures? Quite a bit. So when muslim rulers rightly demand you pay for such religion-specific upkeep, no point protesting. Simple tax evasion should not be tolerated. No special favours for Hindus. If your public services are more expensive, you will pay more.
"Muslim jurists required adult, free, sane males among the dhimma community to pay the jizya,[4] while exempting women, children, elders, handicapped, the ill, the insane, monks, hermits, slaves,[5][6][7][8][9] and musta'mins—non-Muslim foreigners who only temporarily reside in Muslim lands.[5][10] Dhimmis who chose to join military service were also exempted from payment,[1][6][11][12][13] as were those who could not afford to pay.[6][14][15]"

So if you have read this para from Wikipedia, Why don't you go further down the same wiki page and look at the deeds of your secular Mughals, ottomans and other sultanates.

Islamic activists halt construction of first Hindu temple in Islamabad

Petitions filed in court to block work on first Hindu temple in capital since Pakistan’s creation

www.theguardian.com

Tax evasion disgusts me.

Your disgust is going to last forever, because No Jaziya is ever coming to India again

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Only a fool would say this,
nevertheless Jaziya tax was levied not to maintain temples But rather for being a Hindu or Non Muslim.
i.e pay tax or convert to Islam or die
BTW isn't maintaining temples haram in islam,
ooh no no greedy Mughals .

Islamic activists halt construction of first Hindu temple in Islamabad

Petitions filed in court to block work on first Hindu temple in capital since Pakistan’s creation

www.theguardian.com

So if you have read this para from Wikipedia, Why don't you go further down the same wiki page and look at the deeds of your secular Mughals, ottomans and other sultanates.

Islamic activists halt construction of first Hindu temple in Islamabad

Petitions filed in court to block work on first Hindu temple in capital since Pakistan’s creation

www.theguardian.com

Your disgust is going to last forever, because No Jaziya is ever coming to India again

You didn't respond to the information that fat greasy money hoarders who evade military service should pay extra tax in lieu of said military service. Or did you want the Nawab of Bengal to protect your Hindu brethren from maratha filth for free? Are you guests in your own lands to be served by Muslim armies?

And certainly, maintaining the soft **** industry of temple decoration requires money. These carvings get preserved for free? **** costs money. So pay! Or are you one of those cheapskates who gets off on the free previews alone?

 

[suyog chavan]

You didn't respond to the information that fat greasy money hoarders who evade military service should pay extra tax in lieu of said military service. Or did you want the Nawab of Bengal to protect your Hindu brethren from maratha filth for free? Are you guests in your own lands to be served by Muslim armies?

No body welcomed those creepy barbarians with their filthy ideologies into India and levy Tax on people in the first place,

By the above quote statement indirectly , You are claiming Mughals did haram all this long by protecting and maintaining Hindu temples (in reality they didn't). And you name your missiles after them , lol what an impotent hypocrite ohhh the secular Mughals
Maybe your ancestors ought to be one of the millions who converted Due to heavy taxing of Jaziya Under Aurangzeb .
MINE DIDNT.

You didn't respond to the information that fat greasy money hoarders who evade military service should pay extra tax in lieu of said military service. Or did you want the Nawab of Bengal to protect your Hindu brethren from maratha filth for free? Are you guests in your own lands to be served by Muslim armies?

And certainly, maintaining the soft **** industry of temple decoration requires money. These carvings get preserved for free? **** costs money. So pay! Or are you one of those cheapskates who gets off on the free previews alone?

It is neither permissible to visit churches and polytheistic temples, to witness disbelievers acts of worship, to attend their rituals, nor to participate in their feasts, for these are disbelievers own characteristics, and imitating them in such acts is prohibited by the hadith of the Prophet–صلَّى الله عليه

This hadith proves Mughal did haram and were greedy rather than seculars.