Surprised by the conduct of Judge like this. Court is supposed to make decision on merits, in view of circumstances, evidence and witnesses before the Court. Instead of asking someone to guarantee the life of other and making it some damaging exercise for Judiciary, a decision should have been made even if it was to grant him bail for few days like this. What I observed was the reason that he wanted to play clean and not to be the target of later criticism by pro PTI or anti PMLN political mindset in the Country hence, created a reason that look neither NAB nor State was ready to take responsibility hence, Court can't take risk and granted bail. This possible approach is reasonable, to me under current circumstances but less valued as compare to Court should have made a decision without asking for guarantee and issued directions. The later idea would have been more appropriate where at-least I can see that Court has no pressure of any kind and takes responsibility for their decisions and playing justly.
As on over view of situation, it seems like he wanted to remain out of upcoming debates in a fear that PTI etc might use such granted bail decision for political point scoring or putting burden on judiciary, hence, lets call upon State & NAB both and say that look, it was decided due to them.
Rest about any deal without recovery, will be the only reason that IK has no more political career. If, the money is coming back to Pakistan then there is no point of having vengeful proceedings or making it must to hang so & so political corrupt. If you choose to hang them then I don't see any recovery of money but sending them out of Pakistan & politics in lieu of recovery, will be a wise decision. Mind you; we already have threats from East & West as well as internal moles are starting to rise or at-least attempting to disrupt any progress/development so better to start to deal with such threats one by one in appropriate manners. Appropriate manners means with benefit of Pakistan and not just falling to any pressure as such.
I wouldn't use such language on the Forum that has the responsibility as well. Lets not be quoted in negative manners somewhere else that Forum will have to take the heat and nothing lost to the members.
Judiciary has made many historical decisions as well when people used to cheer a lot. Lets not use a single decision as such to generalize and insult Judiciary. One has to consider a lot of factors working simultaneously in one case.