What's new

July 4, 1999 - The Day Clinton Stopped Pakistan from Nuking india

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL...

And India was supposed to sit Idle! (?)
 
The title of the thread should have been the other way round ,"THE DAY WHEN CLINTON STOPPED PAKISTAN FROM GETTING ITSELF NUKED".Had Pakistan actually proceeded any further with it's plan India would have wiped it off the face of earth with a second strike!!:lol:
 
The title of the thread should have been the other way round ,"THE DAY WHEN CLINTON STOPPED PAKISTAN FROM GETTING ITSELF NUKED".Had Pakistan actually proceeded any further with it's plan India would have wiped it off the face of earth with a second strike!!:lol:

LOL....True!!

or better "Clinton stopped pakistan from becoming History" (1947 -1999)

R.I.P :lol:
 
Pakistan would have fooled them to believe that they can Nuke India or will Nuke India. Clinton even if he knew that it was wrong, could have not said anything else.

Pakistan can Nuke India is grossly over estimated, forget 1999 they even do not have a single operational warhead today. The same is applicable to India. Both the countries fool their people in making into believing they have nukes (operational). They might have material for same and know how to assemble it, but they are both having zero operational nukes. Only the US, UK, China, France an Russia has them.
 
Pakistan should have just nuked India.

unlike Pak generals Indian generals rarely open their mouths to make threats and when they do, it counts. I think the only time in Indian history the Chief of Army Staff made a singular statement of nuclear threat was in 1999- anyone who dares to use nuclear weapons will be wiped off the planet. More than enough to send across the message. The perpertrator of that act would have been destroed completely- many times over.
 
Question is Clinton saved whom?:partay:

When does a country decide to cross the nuclear threshold (well any one except America), when they perceive that their conventional forces are near collapse. :P
 
Look at Indians talking all that shiz.

Forget nukes bhartees, you couldn't even deliver those surgical strikes. Rofl.
 
Pakistan didn't need to nuke India. Indians were getting smacked all over Kargil and it was only after the coward ns relented that Indians did any damage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EAK
Pakistan would have fooled them to believe that they can Nuke India or will Nuke India. Clinton even if he knew that it was wrong, could have not said anything else.

Pakistan can Nuke India is grossly over estimated, forget 1999 they even do not have a single operational warhead today. The same is applicable to India. Both the countries fool their people in making into believing they have nukes (operational). They might have material for same and know how to assemble it, but they are both having zero operational nukes. Only the US, UK, China, France an Russia has them.
You see the thing is that Pakistan not having any operational warhead might be justified to some extent if we take into consideration the fact that it has only India to care about!!Whereas in the case of India we have to keep in mind both our Western and Eastern neighbors the latter as u said already have a huge arsenal of operational warheads.So to round it up it is pretty hard to digest the fact that India won't be having atleast 10(HYPOTHETICALLY) operational nuke heads despite of having all the delivery mechanisms that could be required at it's disposal.
 
Look at Indians talking all that shiz.

Forget nukes bhartees, you couldn't even deliver those surgical strikes. Rofl.

Mere PRAH :D

Mujhey 1 bhi Minister ki speech bata dey jisme usney SURGICAL STRIKES ki baat ki ho??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom