Jango
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2010
- Messages
- 21,530
- Reaction score
- 99
- Country
- Location
Two things you need to look at. One the sentence uses the word "may" meaning the unfairness of the election is directly dependent on the extent of rigging or unfair practices during elections and it can be a representative whole electrocal mandate even with a certain level of unfairness or outright rigging. Second is something called the "the benefit of the doubt". In the absence of any evidence that votes were fake, the court of law is obliged to lean towards it being cast in the wrong way or simply unverified.
This report really is pretty dubious TBH.
How can an election be 'unfair' but still represent the will of the people?
As I have said before, the report is far from being what N-league propaganda was since morning...
It admits that the election wasn't completely fair...but as I explained through an analogy elsewhere, if a guy is being investigated for a murder and not the robbery which preceded it, he can be declared innocent still.
Oh well...wasn't expecting much anyway.