kmc_chacko
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2008
- Messages
- 1,076
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
So indians are still stuck on F-16, good to know
Yes we are stuck with your 8 F-16s. Happy ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So indians are still stuck on F-16, good to know
More than happy, no sight is more beautiful than an indian dying of gastric gasYes we are stuck with your 8 F-16s. Happy ?
I agree with Senator Kerry here.This does not make sense.
50 can do the job, then why maintain a load of 500.
No body is stopping you from the research work, if any of that exits.
It's just a number so, pick a safe one & move forward from there.
Obviously losing or reducing part of nuclear arsenal should mean a strong conventional defense to be the spearhead.
Mr.Senator and his likes should offer Pakistan something that she can't refuse.F-16s are certainly not that.So, they will have to do more.
The reason being, Pakistan's trying to create fact on the ground for its future conversion to wealth benefiting the state and the public by extension. 50 does not amount to much fact on the ground and any geopolitical chips. But 500 or 1500 might become fat enough chips which can be negotiated on with wealthy states of the world (who naturally due to their wealth have a stake in keeping the world safe), for a "reduction" from say 1500 to 1100 in some kind of an international arrangement like SALT, while Pakistan is compensated for, in economic terms (preferential access to markets, foreign investments, transfer of needed technologies etc).
Will it solve all of Pakistan's problems? Obviously no. But can it help it to alleviate some? Absolutely yes.
Pakistan's population will top 360 million by middle of this century. That is a population bigger than today's United States crammed into an area less than 8% of United States. Pakistani state has a huge responsibility to shoulder in the next couple of decades while preparing to provide for all these people, by hook or by crook. Failure to do so would mean disaster.
The primary function of Pakistan's nukes is obviously to deter the Indian forces for which per yourself it might require as few as 50. But a secondary function can be assigned as well. The function of portraying a responsible state actor which sits at a table and negotiates about a "reduction" of its huge stockpile in order to make the world a "safer" place and promote "peace" meanwhile being compensated economically (Iran did something similar recently exchanging a self-created fact for geopolitical advantages).
Without this shortcut, the only other alternative to prosperity would be hard work on national level to create an economy capable of wealth generation at a massive scale (a possible feat but something which very few nations in the world have actually been able to do this in history of mankind).
i am surprised Pakistan has said it several times that its ready for mutual nuclear disarmament! do you want me to post every leader quote since 1990 !Pakistan will not accept any unilateral curbs
This is the first time we hear about any scope of nuclear disarmament
Woot nukes, Israel doesn't admit having nukes
I don't see the hypocrisy in this case.Usual american hypocrisy. Reduce your arsenal first americans.
Here you go!Hi,
At least provide facts from genuine source
Yes we are stuck with your 8 F-16s. Happy ?