Indian muslims in British India were just over 25% of the total population yet they won 30 seats out of 102 seats while the remaining went to Congress party. So the percentage of seats were around 29%. In an undivided India, muslims would have made 40% of total population and would have got atleast 40% of the seats. So your assumptions hold no water. You in your quest to prove Jinnah right forget that there were comparable records to prove my point.
Muslims are 15% in India. How many % of Muslims are in Indian National Assembly.
Very few as of now(27 to be precise), that comes around 5%. But they have never won more than 50 seats in all these years. Indian muslims are a scattered lot, so they aren't many muslim majority constituencies.
Forget about India, your so called Islamic world is trying to get closer to Israel..
So be it... Now thank Jinnah and go to sleep
.
:.......Jinnah's 2 nation theory is hence therefore a success.... 
Huh! Your flaws are in your society. If Jinnah was right, then he would have had an Azerbaijan. Whether you like or hate Modi, he is doing a fine job ruling it's quite natural for Pakistanis to be unhappy about his policies. Duh!
Yeah you were saying Muslims wouldn't vote for one party and are distributed, while Hindus will vote for BJP and so on. The existing Indian Muslims is only 14%. So, it would make sense if they don't come majority in constituencies. Now you're comparing 40% with 14%. Given Pakistan and Bangladesh were already Muslim majority and many regions inside India that previously had Muslim majority, no way in gods green earth would there be a Hindu nationalist party ruling with absolute majority.
Like I said, we are not trying to create division among states but a union. Your ideas will lead to further division among states.
True it's way way below.
What percentage of the population of India are Muslims today and what percentage of seats have they gotten?
Jinnah was right, but he could only lay the foundation and he wasn't alive long enough to really cement certain principles into the constitution. What was done after Jinnah is our fault - that doesn't take away from the fact that Jinnah was correct (he absolutely was) it points to the failure on the part of Pakistanis after him to follow through with the vision he had. But just because there have been failures so far doesn't mean that Pakistanis give up. A nation-state is always a work in progress, there is always room for improvement and that evolution and improvement will continue across generations.
40% only works if all 40% can actually vote together - one third of that 40% is within modern India and we can see how many seats in the LS Muslims have. And yes, outside of 'Muslim nationalism' (which would result in demands of significant autonomy, that Nehru rejected, or independence) a single political party would not have been able to unify the Muslim vote. So the end result is that the Muslim vote, splintered into different groups, would not have had anywhere close to the impact that the so called "40% Muslim population' advocates claim.
Jinnah was correct - it's already been proven. Pakistanis want nothing to do with India. Enjoy your country under the rule of a genocidal bigot.
Divisions are created when the union itself is an unnatural one - are you saying that the Indian Union is such a weak and artificial one that granting an exception to J&K because of its unique status (disputed territory pending implementation of UNSC Resolutions) would destroy India? If India is that weak that it cannot survive without coercing minorities into allegiance at the barrel of a gun, then it deserves to disintegrate.
The UNSC Resolutions have both India & Pakistan as parties to the dispute and as signatories to the UN Charter both States are committed to implement them. The Indian government, after passage of the UNSC Resolutions, repeatedly committed to implement the resolutions and specifically the requirement of a plebiscite, so that is right there an international agreement/commitment made by India on the status of J&K and the means to resolve the dispute.
Muslim league has been winning big time since its jump into big stream. Before that muslim independent candidates use to win muslim majority areas.
And that’s what Jinnah foresaw - Hindu nationalism would be met with Muslim nationalism and you’d essentially have a civil war, and with a Central government controlled military, Muslims would be the losers.
And what makes you think that the military would have not had muslim soldiers/officers. In an undivided India, muslims would have had atleast 30-40% of proportional participation in Armed Forces, So would have been the case with Central Government. A central government wouldn't have survived without muslim population/muslim leaders support. And with constant cross migrations, present day Pakistan would have had larger land mass than it is presently. You essentially would have had a civil war at some point of time but present day Pakistan and Bangladesh were always safe centres for muslims. Only the muslims in present day Indian mainland would have been vulnerable. So you lost out on Kashmir, possibly good part of Gujarat, Rajasthan and Punjab. Agreed that Kashmir is an issue which has consumed both our countries.
