Sorry I didn't understand why you brought in the Ahmedis is a point about Mashal Khan. I will try to understand your point.
The point was implementation of law, Ahmedi point was just an example on how in our constitution we have termed them as minorities yet most of them don't declare themselves as a minority and it results in un-necessary hate between the communities. The Ahmedi's start the randi rona that we are being persecuted in Pakistan and the opposing side start their claim that they are violating the constitution by not declaring themselves as Ahmedis. About Mashal Khan, he was killed under the guise of blasphemy. Now if there was proper well enforced law the opposing students would have known that we could take him to court if he did something wrong, thus resulting in a life being saved. And if the judicial system was working properly, justice would have been served, instead of people getting emotional and taking law into their own hands. As I said before the whole argument was about implementation of law.
And I must tell you that "Libtard" is also used by the Right-wing in India to describe the Indian Leftists like Kanhaiya Kumar, Shehla Rashid, Umar Khalid etc. So you should reconsider whether to use that word.
Well, Salman Haider I know from his poem Kafir. And didn't he "disappear" some years ago ??
Nahh there is difference between Indian liberals and Pakistani libtards. We are not in Kashmir with 0.7 million force, we are not in Baluchistan with 0.7 m force. If some one voices their opinion india about the their atrocities in India, you can't compare that with Pakistan.
Well, Communism, according to my knowledge, is the ultimate political stage of humanity ( please read my signature ). The road to that stage goes through Socialism. Pakistan can learn from Socialist societies like Libya, Syria, Venezuela etc.
Yeah we can clearly see their result and surely can learn from them. Do tell me about Venezuelan currency and they had f ton of oil? Do tell me the current state of Libya and Syria? Yeah, we surely need to have vision but we also have to reasonable in our vision. And all these lot have on limited and "fair-land" vision.
Please watch
this interview of her. She is a sensible woman.
Un-lucky I have wasted my time watching the video. Sadly can't get my time back. Immature and rash, are the two words to describe her. Sorry but sensible is the wrong word for her, and as I assumed she is just a branch of the laal band. At 19:00 the anchor asks tell us the "role model country". She couldn't even produce 1 example in the whole existence of mankind. Sorry but I can't take the person seriously. Atleast, Imran Khan talk about Riyast-e-Madina, but for her even that wasn't the role model. All her talk is about Student Unions, and thats a root cause for violence in Pakistan. May be she should read some history and know how different student bodies fight and killed each other on dis-agreements. I have no problem with student unions but its a secondary thing, first their has to be implementation of law. "Ishq ka rang laal hota hai", ch__tia is the word best describing her. Sorry but you need to re-watch that interview, she is all confusion and nothing more. And you are comparing her with Khaniya Kumar, shame on you. Education is not in some peoples hand, sure the quality of government schools is not on par with private schools but that has to do with money and governance.
"Taleem khulay gi tou pata chalay ga"...... There is internet, any one can go to a near internet cafe give 50 Rs and educate his own self on whatever thing he wants to.
Now if you are really want to see a sensible woman, here is an example:
Actually and practically making a difference....
