nalandapride
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2011
- Messages
- 1,581
- Reaction score
- 0
This is not a map for 2012. It's a map created in 1930-1940
Still, how can anyone imagine about enclave as country within other country and think of being free.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is not a map for 2012. It's a map created in 1930-1940
There is lot of flaws in this map. It also includes so many Hindu majority areas. when I and my friend watched this map for the first time, first question to come in our mind was,"Can implementing such thing possible." And it was proved during partition not possible.
There is lot of flaws in this map. It also includes so many Hindu majority areas. when I and my friend watched this map for the first time, first question to come in our mind was,"Can implementing such thing possible." And it was proved during partition not possible.
Minirities most definetly need rights, but what do you expect when even the majority doesn't have the rights they deserve?
Still, how can anyone imagine about enclave as country within other country and think of being free.
1) Stop ranting again & again same thing, i told you that Bengal was supposed to be different country & not part of Pakistan but your head can't accept it.
2) Muslims living peacefully in india? Every one knows how peacefully they living, go few pages back & check videos that i've posted.
as per the map there could have been 10 more muslim state but did that happened ? NO ...
ya.. they are living peacefully and guess what they don't even asking asylum in neighboring countries .
i respect the fact of Pakistan being in existence. the 2 nation theory is failed immediately after the creation of Bangladesh. Islam or being a Muslim could not keep the nation. its a failed thing.
if "partition" was done along these lines though there would have been less bloodshed and massacres cause people wouldn't have to leave their homes for the most part
Pakistan, Bangalistan & Osmanistan were possibilities but yes those small dependencies may have gone to india.
i was just talkin about Pakistan and not Bangladesh. the population of Hindus have decreased in Pakistan while it is increased for Muslims in India. Muslim of India have also proved to be more successful than anyone in Pakistan.You are wrong again cuz Hindus in Pakistan were mostly in East Pakistan, as soon as Bangladesh was created Hindus population went down cuz they than become Bangladeshis.
Keep ranting like a fat head, Bengal was not in Pakistan's plan so it makes no effect if it stays or goes. They choose Pakistan themselves & they left Pakistan themselves. Originally there were 3 countries Pakistan, Bangalistan & Osmanistan according to plan.
Lol, look how much bigger Pakistan was meant to be. They got sooo much more land than they were originally meant to get and yet they showed their greedy side, and tried to get Kashmir too.
not really.Lol, look how much bigger Pakistan was meant to be. They got sooo much more land than they were originally meant to get and yet they showed their greedy side, and tried to get Kashmir too.